• unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    131
    ·
    3 months ago

    FYI they are very fucking small nowhere near as big as in this image. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fig_wasp

    Forcing her way through the ostiole, the mated mature female often loses her wings and most of her antennae. To facilitate her passage through the ostiole, the underside of the female’s head is covered with short spines that provide purchase on the walls of the ostiole.

    In depositing her eggs, the female also deposits pollen she picked up from her original host fig. This pollinates some of the female flowers on the inside surface of the fig and allows them to mature. After the female wasp lays her eggs and follows through with pollination, she dies.[15]

    After pollination, there are several species of non-pollinating wasps that deposit their eggs before the figs harden. These wasps act as parasites to either the fig or possibly the pollinating wasps.

    As the fig develops, the wasp eggs hatch and develop into larvae. After going through the pupal stage, the mature male’s first act is to mate with a female - before the female hatches. Consequently, the female will emerge pregnant. The males of many species lack wings and cannot survive outside the fig for a sustained period of time. After mating, a male wasp begins to dig out of the fig, creating a tunnel through which the females escape.[16]

    Once out of the fig, the male wasps quickly die. The females find their way out, picking up pollen as they do. They then fly to another tree of the same species, where they deposit their eggs and allow the cycle to begin again.

    • Prontomomo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      3 months ago

      If you look at the detail in the ghosty wasp, it’s clear that it’s just an edited image of a wasp pasted onto a fig

    • Ignotum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      nowhere as big as in this image

      Yeah when they’re alive, but everyone knows you grow larger when you become a ghost

    • Smoogs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yes however it’s a ghost wasp. It can take whatever phantom size it damn well pleases

    • [object Object]@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Not much of a life. Larvae can already be argued to be the main stage of life in many insects, as they get to chill around and munch on plants for ages, while adults have to fly somewhere, shag, lay eggs and croak. With these wasps, the adult male has things way more straightforward for him, and the female seems to not even get to enjoy the larval stage.

    • wizzim@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      This is interesting. Regarding a sentence:

      Allow them to mature

      Does it mean the figs cannot mature without the wasp ? Does it mean that each ripe fig has been visited by a wasp ?

      • flora_explora@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yes exactly. They are both dependent on each other in that way.

        And to add on to that, figs are super important food trees in the tropics, because they are the only trees that produce fruits all year around. (Because they have to, otherwise the fig wasp population couldn’t sustain itself.) So many animal species are also dependent on the steady food source of fig trees (btw most look very different from the common fig tree, Ficus carica).

      • [object Object]@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I mean, a fruit with seeds is formed from a flower after pollination. It’s just that on the figs, the flower is apparently inside the unripe fruit.

    • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m a vegan, although not super strict. But I knew some terror vegans who do not consider vigs vegan.

      The definition of “vegan” differs. Like, I don’t like products that had a nervous system. So technically I could eat oysters. But some vegans consider oranges not to be vegan because there might be an animal product in the pesticides used on oranges. Some claim they only use plant based products, but they get mad when I ask them about fungi, as their cell structure looks more like an animal cell than a plant cell (I love to make terror vegans mad).

      Being vegan means you buy products which fit your idea of being vegan.

      And sadly for some it means you need to be a fucking asshole to anyone you meet.

      • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 months ago

        Regarding your last paragraph: that’s unrelated. There are also lots of insufferably vocal meat eaters who feel personally attacked when someone else doesn’t religiously stuff themselves with meat every meal.

        • 42beansinapod@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          I know zero (0) vocal vegans but 3 meat eaters who make a point on hating vegans and sometimes make it sound like they eat extra meat to spite vegans.

          One of them once said to me a restaurant can only be good if it has no vegetarian options.

          • BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yeah, I usually don’t say anything, unless it’s unaoidable and then I usually just say I don’t eat all that much meat.

            Most will leave it at that, but I’ll happily answer. I don’t really want to yuck people’s yums, and the food industry is a bit of a special interest of mine.

            Advertising is one hell of a drug. Everybody running around eating bacon and butter, and beef tallow, and haven’t had a gram of fiber, getting colon cancer at forty.

            Candidly, I think your vocal vegan is like your radical feminist, or social justice warrior, or diversity hire: mostly made up.

        • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 months ago

          meat eaters who feel personally attacked when someone else doesn’t religiously stuff themselves with meat every meal.

          Oh, do tell.

          • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I live in Bavaria. There are multiple politicians who don’t get tired to performatively eat sausages and try to make laws that mandate calling oat milk “oat drink” and vegan burgers/schnitzel/… anything else. As if anyone would ever get confused by that. There’s a common joke that they should rename “scouring milk” to “scouring drink” otherwise people get confused!!!

      • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        But do they realize all atoms eventually cycle through the ecosystem?

        I’m sure all carbon atoms were part of animal at some point. I guess your fake vegans are just molecular vegans and not atomic vegans.

        • mathemachristian [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Veganism are the consumption practices of people advocating for animal liberation. It’s not just about diet but also leather jackets/zoo visits etc. It’s not like being part of an animal that imbues the individual molecules with some mystic energy that renders them off limits, it’s that 99.99% of the time that obtaining these molecules in sufficient quantities requires overstepping boundaries of consent if not outright murder/slavery.

          But I would consider scavenged meat for instance vegan, I still wouldn’t because meat gives me the ick now, but I don’t see how it is contrary to animal liberation (provided it doesn’t disrupt other animals mourning rituals or something similar). Or rescued sheep still require shearing. It’s not as brutal as farmers shearing and obviously not done with the wool in mind but rather the sheep. So the sheep are typically shorn(?) sooner than enslaved sheep and not as close to the skin, making “vegan wool” quite a bit harder to work with, but I would consider socks made out of that wool vegan.

          • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            That is one definition of vegan, and you seem to be happy living by it. But others might have other definitions. A good chunk does not even share your motivation for being vegan, there are plenty of religious practices, dietary reasons, ecological concerns… That doesn’t diminish your definition of it, but that is something to keep in mind when talking about other people.

            • mathemachristian [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              No this is what veganism is. Veganism goes back to the Vegan Society and it’s fight for the rights of non-human animals. Many people claim to be vegan without actually being vegan and I will not be diluting the definition. Veganism is at it’s core about animal rights. There are plenty of reasons to go with a plant-based diet. A plant-based diet is part of veganism, but they are very much not the same thing. If someone claims to be vegan but still goes to the zoo or buys pets they did not understand what veganism is.

              Edit: here is the vegan societies definition

              “Veganism is a philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude—as far as is possible and practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food, clothing or any other purpose; and by extension, promotes the development and use of animal-free alternatives for the benefit of animals, humans and the environment. In dietary terms it denotes the practice of dispensing with all products derived wholly or partly from animals.”

              - https://www.vegansociety.com/go-vegan/definition-veganism

        • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Hahaha next time I meet one who is starting a discussion to fish (pun intended) for something to trigger on, I now have the perfect comeback 😎

          “you’re just a molecular vegan, not an atomic vegan, you’re just a poser”

        • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          All fruits have that, if you enhance your view enough. Put any fruit under a microscope and it’s crawling with creatures.

            • TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Also depends on whether you consider fungi an animal of a plant. As their cell structure resembles more of animal cells than plant cells. And fungi are everywhere. Humans, animals and plants would all die if fungi would seize to exist. They are in our body, create our food and medicine, they are the cycle of life as they break down dead tissue, they feed plants and trees. The oldest living organism is a fungus. They are what keep us all alive, they are basically mother earth. And we eat that. Seeing The Last Of Us suddenly makes a lot of sense. Revenge of the fungi.

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Idk isn’t that like saying all animal pollinated plants are not vegan?

        • Fedizen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          I guess it depends on if people think roadkill is vegan; the dead wasp is part of the life cycle of the wasp/fig symbiosis so its going to die well before humans intervene.

          Imo the argument could be made that by clearing land for vegetables there’s a large reduction in habitable natural environments. This results in things dying that normally wouldn’t. Especially true when you consider pesticides.

          So is the problem the dead bug in the fig or the dead bug outside, say, an apple?

          • Arachnidbrilliant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            I’ve only been vegan for eight years. I really don’t know what I’m talking about. I’ve never really researched it. I just don’t need animal products. But it seems like eating anything that was an animal or has an animal in it isn’t vegan

            Fuck goose down

            And I mean, where do we draw the line? There’s microscopic organisms that we kill all the time

            • Fedizen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Imo, don’t think about it too hard. I think it makes more sense to eat creatures based on a mix of survivorship curve and whether they are intelligent enough to need to be confined.

              If you’re building infrastructure more to contain animals rather than keep other ones out, imo that’s the pivot point.

              Idealized survivorship curves:

              Type 1 and 2 are easy no’s. Type 3 is generally fine as long as its not like an adult turtle or octopus. Type 3 organisms are probably going to get eaten a lot and early in nature while its rare for the adults to get eaten.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Its not 100% accurate. Some wasps get trapped, not all. And there exists a fig species that doesn’t need wasps

      • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Damn, I hadn’t understood it as all figs needing wasps, but figured it was more the reverse of what you’re now saying where maybe some specific varieties had adapted to need them. I already was not a fan of figs, but this is definitely too spoopy for my tastes.

        • BCsven@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah it changed my love of figs a bit. Fig Newtons…now with 25% less wasps.

          • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            They should have worked the wasp angle into their old “A cookie is just a cookie…” commercials. Kids already hated those things, this would have really made the brand stick heh

    • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      3 months ago

      Most vegans do. The general idea is to avoid exploiting animals, but the wasps are living out their natural life cycle. There are a small number of people who do worry about preventing wild insect suffering but they’re not concerned particularly with figs.

    • tidderuuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Vegans eat other foods that use fertilizer. Fertilizers could contain meat or meat byproducts… So…

    • flora_explora@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah sure I’ll eat figs. You don’t eat the fig wasps as they have been eaten by the fig already. If I knew there was a fig wasp still inside, I wouldn’t eat it though.

    • baggachipz@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      3 months ago

      ffs they won’t eat honey, and that’s only because you’re stealing the fruits of the bees’ labor. I would assume the International Vegan Council outright bans figs with extreme prejudice.

      • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        they won’t eat honey, and that’s only because you’re stealing the fruits of the bees’ labor

        Not the only reason. For example, an infamous and common practice in the honey industry is to cut off the queen’s wings, ensuring the hive has no choice but to stay there and produce honey.

        I’ve never met a vegan who won’t eat figs; figs’ relationship with fig wasps is symbiotic, and yes, excluding fruit on the basis that “eating the fruit of a pollinated plant is exploiting the pollinator” probably far oversteps the “practicable” part of veganism:

        Veganism is a philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude—as far as is possible and practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food, clothing or any other purpose; and by extension, promotes the development and use of animal-free alternatives for the benefit of animals, humans and the environment. In dietary terms it denotes the practice of dispensing with all products derived wholly or partly from animals.

          • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Good question. I wouldn’t (we’re assuming casual foraging for fun and not a survival situation); it’s still not vegan, but it’d be arguably less unethical on a spectrum.

            A con compared to the apiary is that these wild bees aren’t being artificially supplemented by e.g. sugar water; it’s live-or-die for them, and that’s their food. It’s not in me to take that away from them when I don’t have to.

            If someone took like a teaspoon of honey (still the lifetime output of about a dozen bees) while giving the bees something greater in return, then I don’t think most vegans would think it’s inherently wrong*, but like any ethical framework, whenever you try to find contrived boundaries, it’s kind of like “okay, but why?” It’s sometimes engaging on the armchair but rarely in practice.

            A huge pro compared to the apiary is avoiding, in addition to the physical mistreatment of the bees themselves, the perpetuation of the exploitation. If you one-and-done plunder a hive, that’s not vegan, but you’re not giving money to someone as a way of telling them “thanks, and keep doing this”.

            * I’m making a hand-wavey assumption here that you can just do that without pissing off and killing a bunch of bees or smoking them out just so we can have perfectly ideal ethical conditions.

      • mathemachristian [he/him]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        This is more in the “dead worms in the compost make their way into the vegetables we eat” wheelhouse than in the “lets steal these animals labor for their young, risking death and injury to the workers while doing so” wheelhouse

  • Deacon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    This actually explains the infamous Fig Newton Debacle of ‘92, which my extended family is still divided over.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    3 months ago

    The only way to get food that doesn’t contain bugs and rat shit is to grow it indoors, in virtually hermetically sealed rooms.

    Also, the more processed your food, the more material you don’t want it contains. Which is why I’m surprised that so many vegans are on the fake meat bandwagon. The fact that they eat so much processed food clearly shows the claim that they’re doing it for health is poorly thought out.

    • TheTechnician27@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 months ago

      Which is why I’m surprised that so many vegans are on the fake meat bandwagon. The fact that they eat so much processed food clearly shows the claim that they’re doing it for health is poorly thought out.

      This a fundamental misunderstanding of what veganism is, namely:

      a philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude—as far as is possible and practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food, clothing or any other purpose; and by extension, promotes the development and use of animal-free alternatives for the benefit of animals, humans and the environment. In dietary terms it denotes the practice of dispensing with all products derived wholly or partly from animals.

      A plant-based diet for health is normally a “whole foods plant-based diet”, for which a mountain of well-studied health benefits exist. But vegans who eat plant-based for the animals can have any level of care about their own health that they want just like any omnivore can; that part is a spectrum.