• xantoxis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    2 years ago

    All of these things definitely were in the news, of course. They just don’t STAY in the news, and the public memory hole works fast.

    • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      62
      ·
      2 years ago

      Because they’re fucking bread crumbs. What you want us to hold a parade over credit card fees while housing, education, healthcare and food continue to become more expensive and Biden’s cabinet works to suppress wages? Neato.

      • greenskye@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Ya, basically Biden is only able to solve minor first world problems instead of any sort of meaningful attempt on any of the several huge issues.

        This isn’t all his fault, he’s not a king and can’t do whatever he wants, but I also don’t often find my own managers all that happy with me when all I can say I’ve accomplished is minor, non-critical tasks and haven’t even started on the major work they want accomplished. Making a report look nicer and fixing the break room coffee machine isn’t going to cover for failing to launch our latest product. Americans are right to be disappointed in their government and we should be disappointed in our media for failing to stick to larger issues.

        • Daxtron2@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          I’m more disappointed in the people who keep voting conservative blockers into the senate and house than I am that biden won’t circumvent them.

          • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            I’m disappointed in them and fucking livid at shitbags like Sinema who run on a platform and gleefully give the middle finger to everyone while they do the exact opposite once in office.

            • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              This isn’t an accident. The same thing happened during Obama’s presidency.

              People don’t want to face facts: The Democrat party is filled to the brim with pro-corporate trash.

        • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          He could have stayed out of the rail strike, he could have not gone around congress to ship weapons to Israel and he could have told Yellen not to make suppression of worker wages her goal.

          You’re trying to deflect blame away from him as if we’re all expecting him to do things he can’t. Biden isn’t acting in our interests and it should come as no surprise that means we’re not interested in voting for him again.

          • greenskye@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Do you think not voting will make the world better? Biden isn’t perfect and I’ll continue to pursue progressive candidates in primaries, but I don’t see what anyone gains by not voting or voting for someone who’s definitely going to do a lot more that I disagree with. I didn’t disagree that America has a right to be angry with him, regardless of any excuses, but you still live in reality and have to deal with the situation you have, not the one you want.

          • TheFonz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Tell us you don’t know anything about how the rail strike got resolved and what the outcomes were…

        • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          2 years ago

          Especially since Biden was brought into that position to do precisely that. Do some pet projects but not challenge the underlying root issues of inequality and peoples economic situation. Because that would be against the interests of the billionaire “donors” of the Dems and Reps.

            • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 years ago

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Deal

              Yes. They are pet projects compared to what other presidents have achieved and what is needed to change the country to an economically, socially and ecologically sustainable new status quo. Biden is preventing that change together with his DNC buddies who want to make sure the inequality in the US stays, the interests of the super rich are kept and the white upper class remains in power.

      • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 years ago

        They’re steps in the right direction, but in general I agree with the sentiment. We need much more drastic changes.

  • arthurpizza@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    42
    ·
    2 years ago

    Biden has made significant progress for the average person during his presidency, which is disheartening given the potential for even greater impact. It seems he knows that simply meeting basic expectations will be enough to outdo previous leaders.

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        49
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        2 years ago

        We need more Democrats in Congress for that. A third of the Senate and all of the House are up for election in November. Attendance at the polls is crucial for down-ballot candidates just the same as presidential.

        Vote in November, or be ready to accept what a Republican President, Congress, and SCOTUS decide for you.

        • meep_launcher@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          2 years ago

          The thing that stinks is

          A) the electoral college makes it so only 4 or 5 states really matter

          B) there’s an amnesia about trump from the never trump republicans. My dad is conservative but didn’t vote trump. He thought he was an asshole. Now my dad talks about how Biden is crooked, and the only reason people hate trump is because, and his words, “orange man bad”.

          C) puritanical leftists have valid reasons to not like Biden, but they are willing to blow up the system as they always have. I say puritanical because I know there are pragmatic leftists who exercise restraint in their actions.

          In 2020, the suburban vote was a critical win for Biden. I’m hoping for the best, but I’m starting to sit with the fact that Trump has a decent, if not likely, chance of winning in 2020.

          • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            The Electoral College has nothing to do with congressional elections.

            The rest of your points can be addressed by providing information to those who are misinformed or disenfranchised. Abstaining may not be a vote for Trump, but it’s a refusal to stand in his way.

            • meep_launcher@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              Right they’re talking about Congress. There’s still issues with districting though.

              • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                You vote for your Senators and House Representatives directly. The Electoral College has nothing to do with that.

                Each state has two Senate seats, voted on statewide. Districting does not affect that vote.

                Districting issues may make some votes less likely to make a difference in the House vote in specific districts in Republican states. That’s all the more reason to get as many Democrats to vote as possible.

                The average Democratic voting representation for congressional elections is less than 50%. We constantly complain about the repercussions of our own inaction.

        • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          2 years ago

          We need more Democrats in Congress for that. A third of the Senate and all of the House are up for election in November. Attendance at the polls is crucial for down-ballot candidates just the same as presidential.

          What guarantees can you give us they won’t “fumble” the ball like they did during Obama’s presidency? If they do will you finally acknowledge the fucking problem?

          • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            There’s none, other than the guarantee that Republicans will take the ball as far as they can in the opposite direction if we don’t vote. When was the last time a team won a game by walking off the field?

            • oortjunk@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              2 years ago

              Man! I love when people reduce the nuanced complexities of modern politics to a team sport. That’s just such a great way to reframe any issue to an us or them context.

              And, when you get right down to it, that’s really what this world needs: more acceptance and enforcement of norms that pit half of us against the other half.

              Ah! Progress!

              • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                I agree that polarization is a real problem. The only reason I continued to use the analogy from the previous commenter was to maintain consistency in conversation.

                However, there are only two parties that are capable of winning this election. Believing otherwise is distraction, not progress.

                • oortjunk@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  You are sadly correct. My comment was not meant, in particular, to call you or your habits out, but a cynical snipe at all of us. Apologies if it came across negative, cos that’s also not gonna help any 🤝

            • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              There’s none

              Thanks for admitting that Democrat politicians are corrupt pro-corporate trash. Come up with a winning strategy and I’ll come back to the field.

      • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        He can’t do that.

        People keep saying the things Biden have been doing are weak, half measures, but they have no idea what he’s actually capable of doing without Congress.

        He literally tried to wipe away a significant amount of student debt. He tried to fulfill that promise without Congress. The Supreme Court stopped it.

        • greenskye@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Honestly I think the entirety of the last 10 years of complete government failure should be tied back to the almost totally non-functional legislature.

          The president can’t pass laws. The supreme court would matter far less, if we weren’t trying to creatively reinterpret ancient laws and applying them to technology and culture that didn’t even exist at the time they were written. Instead of updating and clarifying any of those laws, the supreme court has been allowed to effectively make policy by continually shifting interpretations of a static and obsolete set of laws that Congress should have updated 20 years ago. Several times courts have effectively changed policy by saying ‘the law doesn’t mean that, go write an actual law for that, don’t just make shit up’ and then Congress just doesn’t react at all.

          If you look back at history, constitutional amendments were relatively regular up until recently. Can anyone imagine our current government passing an amendment for anything at all? Even the most minor tweak would be impossible in this Congress. Several of our major ‘wins’ were mere court cases and like we found out with abortion, what the court gives, the court can take away. Anything about our current day to day life that exists solely based on a court ruling we should be fighting to codify into law, but we all seem to recognize how futile that task is.

        • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          2 years ago

          Funny how often Democrats try to do things that will definitely fail but then with things they actually can change there’s always some bullshit excuse.

          We don’t have medicare for all or something similar because Democrats refused to make it happen during Obama’s term. That combined with the kid gloves they took to the financial sector during the financial crisis disillusioned a lot of people. Most Democrat politicians are corrupt pro-corporate trash.

          • Eldritch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Because there wasn’t support for it. Sure it has pretty broad public support. But our elected officials don’t. It’s not a bullshit excuse. It sucks but it’s true. And acting like a child certainly won’t fix it.

            • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              Because there wasn’t support for it. Sure it has pretty broad public support. But our elected officials don’t. It’s not a bullshit excuse.

              Those elected officials were Democrats. You’re just proving my point. When the power is out of their hands you’re like “Omg they want to and if you just vote harder they’ll totally do it!” but then when the power is in their hands you just shrug and say “They didn’t support it.”

              Yes, I know they don’t support it. That’s why I’m not voting for them.

              • Eldritch@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                And that’s why they aren’t voting for it. No one is proving your point. And no it’s not just Democrats. Whatever conspiracy pit you frequent, you need to get out.

                • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Are you a bot? It seems like you just lost the entire context of the conversation. Let me remind you.

                  Me:

                  We don’t have medicare for all or something similar because Democrats refused to make it happen during Obama’s term.

                  You:

                  Because there wasn’t support for it.

                  Me:

                  Yes, I know they don’t support it. That’s why I’m not voting for them.

                  You:

                  And no it’s not just Democrats.

                  Are you following along now Siri?

    • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      2 years ago

      which is disheartening given the potential for even greater impact

      What potential? Without Congress or the Supreme Court, what potential things could Biden be doing that would have “greater” impact that he isn’t doing?

      Something that doesn’t require a new law, and won’t be shot down by a hostile conservative court?

      Please give me examples.

      • Zorque@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 years ago

        Without Congress or the Supreme Court

        Pretty sure the potential lies in changing this.

        Vote. Not just for president, but for every office you’re able to. Because this shit isn’t just “Trump did it!” or “Biden didn’t do enough!” It’s also the legislators, and a lot of the judiciary they approved (and probably pushed during the Trump administration). Not to mention all the state and local reps that initiate most of the policies that affect people.

        • greenskye@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          It basically all starts with Congress. We could fix so much shit if we ever managed to get a real majority (not 48 Dems and two ‘not technically Republicans’)

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            We could fix so much shit if we ever managed to get a real majority

            We would just change it to “we could fix so much shit if we ever managed to get a supermajority.”

            And then redefine “supermajority” to mean 67.

      • rdyoung@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        2 years ago

        They can’t give you any examples and neither can the dorkuses downvoting you. Biden has accomplished a lot with the maggats playing the “I don’t wanna” game whenever a dem is in office. He not only had to dig us out of the hole the orange menace left us in, he also has to cure cancer, be the first human to step on Mars, etc and even then people will find something to bitch about.

        With any luck (and a lot of hard work) we will have Biden for a second term and then a dem to replace him in 2028 so at least 12 years of the adults running things. Then maybe we can get some shit done and stop trying to tread water at best.

        • InternetUser2012@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          2 years ago

          Biden could fix everything and walk on water and they’d still hate for some bullshit that isn’t true or above their room temp iq.

        • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          2 years ago

          and then a dem to replace him in 2028

          HRC will win the primaries in 2028 and we’ll be having the same argument we’re having now. Pro-corporate trash isn’t doing the trick.

      • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        He could get caught trying.

        He could frame a big-picture vision of what he and Democrats value, expressed in terms that speak to Americans emotionally. He could push for policies that Republicans and the Supreme Kangaroo Court will shoot down, and then go to the American people and blame them for taking away good things that everybody wants.

        The student-loan debt relief effort had about 1 1/2 of those things. The rest of the time he tends to talk about particular bills and policies. Republicans can stop those, and those things become dead letters, but dreams and hopes are evergreen.

        • Strykker@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          It takes immense amounts of time and effort to bring new items like this forwards, so each item you choose to do means time and money that can’t be used bringing a different policy forwards.

          Based on that why should Biden waste his time developing and bringing forward policies that the Republicans are obviously going to immediately shoot down, it just prevents him from being able to work on things that might actually get passed

          • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 years ago

            No, it really doesn’t. I can think them up by the dozens. If they’re not going to pass, there’s no reason to lay all the groundwork. But they’re still good for rhetorical purposes.

            • Strykker@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              2 years ago

              Sure you can think up the tag line line liner title for each item but what about all the details? How will they work the restrictions the requirements the funding. How much of that requires large amounts of work just to be shutdown and tossed by the Republicans

              • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                This is why Democrats struggle so badly, so I’ll say it straight up: It’s about sales. Reich is complaining that the public doesn’t lose its shit over arcane policy details. Yeah, sit down for this truth bomb (/s): That’s human nature. It’s not fair. It’s not right. It’s not good. It’s just the way it is. Complaining about it won’t help, or change the content of headlines.

                So somebody asks for examples of what can Biden do when he’s blocked by Congress? I say: Sell, sell, sell. Get in the PR game. Put on a show that the people in the cheap seats can enjoy. (That is a metaphor for a rhetorical spectacle that even politically unengaged citizens will hear about.) Show everybody that the problem is in Congress.

                What do the details matter? The headline is all that people will hear, and Republicans will block it, anyway. He needs to sell the perception that Democrats are trying. The details can come later, after they get the votes.

              • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                2 years ago
                • Build a giant net on the border with Canada to keep geese out.
                • Make Friday part of the weekend.
                • Give every new baby a chocolate eclair.
                • Issue bulletproof vests to all citizens to help survive mass shootings.
                • No more speed limits in Interstate highways. (Okay, absurd ones are harder to think of than real issues that people care about.)
                • Cheaper health care.
                • Cheaper housing.
                • Cheaper groceries.
                • Cheaper fuel.
                • Codify reproductive freedom in law.
                • Hold the media accountable to the truth.
                • Ban insider trading in Congress.
                • Ensure that people have secure jobs, with dignity.

                Details, schmetails. The post is a complaint by Robert Reich that voters aren’t paying attention to details. And ITT, plenty of Lemmings pointing out that Biden can’t pass very many policy proposals, anyway. The idea is to sell the perception that Democrats understand and care about issues facing Americans.

                The big picture comes first to get Democrats elected, then get down to the details.

        • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Shame on you for saying that! I’m sure you’ll be downvoted.

          He’s boring and uninspirational and isn’t accomplishing anything of note… but you should not question any of that!

          Just rah-rah until defeated, and repeat.

          • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            2 years ago

            You mean the bombs Biden shipped to Israel? Did the sharpie make them extra deadly or something?

            Lol bud all Biden’s “resistance” to Bibi is going to disappear the moment the election results come in. And you’ll still defend Biden anyway.

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      But don’t you think getting the 10 commandments in our classrooms will make things soo much better? 🙃

    • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah. But they’re not. Usually.

      Interestingly that’s more a function of media more than politics. Political movement “in a vacuum” doesn’t require popularity. But since we have put political power in the hands of everyone vs a king or whatever, the media is the ocean in which politics “swims”.

  • Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Expanding internet access in rural areas with the Build Back Better plan. That alone was a massive investment into our infrastructure.

      • Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        I have family in rural NC , two different areas. Both have lived in those areas for 15 yrs. When AT&T pulled out due to not enough customers, they lost internet. The only option they had was 10 down, 1 up (advertised), for $65 a month.

        Last year they got word AT&T, and several smaller name companies were moving out there. Now they get 300 down, 10 up for $50.

  • Queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    2 years ago

    But they did make headlines, that’s how we know about these. The FTC and FCC doing their job more is good and makes headlines.

    It’s good, don’t get me wrong. But man it feels like table scraps compared to a lot on what Biden ran on in 2020.

    • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      Not really. The average person knows more about trump’s bowel movements than these accomplishments. The average undecided voter is lazy and needs information spoon-fed to them. That’s why it matters what is reported in the media.

      • Queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Sure, I agree that it should be brought up more, and that Trump gets endless free airtime even from liberal news outlets. But it’s just wild to go “No one remembers or talks about these, the media ignores it!” while we’re talking about it and the good it has done.

        • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          2 years ago

          “We” are not the corporate media, but to your point they did dutifully report these stories, perfunctorily, on page 23 or behind the weather, sports, movie recommendations and lots of ads.

          The reporting was not commensurate with the benefits of the policies. As such, the people who most need to know about them likely won’t, but “we” do.

    • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      But man it feels like table scraps compared to a lot on what Biden ran on in 2020.

      Given that the republiQans retook the house in 2022, what did Biden run on that he hasn’t delivered?

      • Queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        24
        ·
        2 years ago
        • Freeing Mexican citizens locked in cages at the border, but has in fact increased the numbers according to the ACLU, and now limiting the numbers of who can come in like fascist Trump wanted
        • The COVID pandemic is still ongoing, we’re just ignoring it while I’ve had friends die from it after it was “over” according to the CDC. Also removing the 14 day expected leave for it to improve companies fucking over sick and healthy workers alike the economy
        • Roe v Wade being reinstated, for the party that “cares about women’s rights”.
        • Minimum Wage increases (Yes Congress is in charge of the purse, but can he say “please fucking do it so everyone has better income?”)
        • Ran on trying to stop cops from shooting innocent civilians, but in his first State of the Union said “We don’t need to defund the police, we need to fund the police!” to bipartisan roaring applause. I know he has a fucking cop as a VP, but god damn.
        • And he’s not doing anything to stop Project 2025 from getting into place if Trump wins.
        • Could maybe consider giving new arms to Ukraine and stop funding explicit genocide in Palestine.
        • Didn’t help the unions during the rail strikes give into the demands for better worker safety and benefits, blocking it like how Reagan blocked the FAA from striking for safety and benefits
        • Still allows Trump-era expansions of spying agencies, that was made public under “constitutional lawyer and defender” Obama, and instated under Dubya.

        But we don’t have the President saying stupid shit on Twitter every day, so I guess that means we’re back to a sane normal, or whatever white cishet liberals need to say to sleep well at night. Ignore the bloodshed of BIPOC and queers, women and their doctors fleeing red states over being arrested for bodily autonomy, and that white nationalists just goosestep freely because its not respectable to tell fascists to fuck off and die, it doesn’t impact you, so it’s all sane politics and electable!

    • subtext@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah these absolutely made headline / TV news when they passed. No idea what OP means.

      • Snowclone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        He means they aren’t brokered talking points. No one is pushing this, because there’s not a huge amount of money, bots, every news outlet that has a vested financial interest in getting Biden a second term.

        Trump was found guilty, took a huge hit in polls, then turned around and had the biggest funding boost in US history.

  • Yokozuna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 years ago

    Wait… no medical debt goes to your credit report? Is this a thing now or is it something he’s working on?

    • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 years ago

      https://www.seattletimes.com/business/medical-debt-may-be-wiped-from-credit-reports-heres-why-thats-a-big-deal/

      The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has proposed a rule that would remove medical bills from credit reports, a ban that would prevent lenders from considering those debts when making decisions about whether to issue loans.

      The proposed rule change, announced Tuesday, would also increase privacy protections, help raise credit scores and prevent debt collectors from using the credit reporting system to coerce people to pay.

      . . . The proposed rule is open for public comment through Aug. 12, with the bureau working toward a final rule that would take effect next year.

        • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          It does mean something. It means there’s a plan, a bill, an Executive Order, political capital, political will, money/budget, and to see it through to universal acceptance so that it can’t be immediately rescinded by the next orange rapist administration and it only takes votes.

          In many cases it is already actually happening. These are all real examples, real things that are, in fact, happening. Things often “never go anywhere” because right-wing sewerholes and their friends around the political spectrum destroy those efforts at every available opportunity.

          RepubliQans and their supporters have, often, stated that their only goals are to prevent efforts like these from “going anywhere”. It’s a constant fight just to keep what we have now ffs because big money buys fascists cheaply and that’s what we’re fighting every session, every conference, every vote, every goddamned time.

          I get cynical, it’s absolutely understandable but, after decades of mikquetoast middle-of-the-road republiQan-lite Democratic initiatives (think “better jobs” and “middle-class tax breaks”) we’re finally - after the deeply humiliating disaster of the trump “presidency” - finally getting traction, buy-in, and votes for real positive progressive things.

            • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              Fair enough. Having lived through decades of continuous so-so blah Democratic actions, this latest movement is, possibly from just the failure of everything else they’ve tried instead of listening to the progressives, it’s well, pretty good. And it gives me some hope, should we survive the next existential threat, and the ones after that.

      • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        It didn’t even HAPPEN? What the hell homesweethomeMrL?

        I’m not going to factcheck your post. I have to dismiss it. You have clearly mislead us all

        If you’re TRULY on the side of facts and integrity, you should edit it and explain which items here aren’t actually done.

        Disgusting.

  • Red_October@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Meanwhile: “Good isn’t perfect, so fuck that and fuck you.”

    Too many people are all too ready to say that improvement isn’t enough, it has to be a perfect and complete solution or else what was the point.

    • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Which says they’re either not clear on how this whole “government” thing operates (which, tbf most people aren’t) and/or too young to have had experiences with government much before, and/or deliberately parroting a talking point designed to depress turnout for one of a few reasons.

      It’s that last one that seems most in evidence unfortunately. And mostly from people who don’t seem to remember 2016 that well.

      • fsxylo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        There’s some dipshits that call Democrats Blue maga in a desperate last ditch effort to bring legitimacy to the notion that “both sides are the same”. Either because they want Trump to win or because they believe they’re an anime protagonist and they can will a third option into being. The /s means I’m sarcastically supporting that notion.

        • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          2 years ago

          No we call you that because you spend all your energy fighting us instead of working to rid the Democrat party of pro-corporate trash.

          • fsxylo@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            I spend more energy jerking off than talking to you. If you mean the incendiary way I talk down to people like you, that’s because I have fire on speed dial and “fuck off” just doesn’t cut it these days.

            PS -> I’m not a democrat. inb4: I’m not a Trump supporter either.

            • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              I spend more energy jerking off than talking to you. If you mean the incendiary way I talk down to people like you, that’s because I have fire on speed dial and “fuck off” just doesn’t cut it these days.

              Great. Redirect that energy towards the people who keep voting for pro-corporate trash in the primaries.

          • Syrc@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            instead of working to rid the Democrat party of pro-corporate trash.

            So how is that done exactly? By hiring hitmen?

            • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              I think a great first step would be to stop spending all your energy lecturing leftists and go after the people who vote for this procorporate trash in the primaries. At the very least it would convince me you’re actually interested in solving the problem and not just trying to get people to kick the can for your benefit.

              • Syrc@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                First, what exactly do you mean by “going after”? Again, do I have to break their legs or what?

                And most importantly second, where are those people? Because I’ve seen exactly none on Lemmy or Reddit. I would like to argue with someone who actually thinks Biden deserved the candidacy over others like Bernie, but they’re definitely not here and I wouldn’t even know where to “look” for them. I do what I can on the social I use.

                • go_go_gadget@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  First, what exactly do you mean by “going after”? Again, do I have to break their legs or what?

                  Lol I love how when I propose this people’s reading comprehension just falls off a cliff. Like they’re going ham on lecturing leftists and young people for their voting habits but super confused about what they could do with moderate voters.

                  But sure I’ll play along and pretend “go after” wasn’t clear in this context.

                  Here’s an example: Every time you have the urge to tell a leftist what to do on lemmy immediately log out. Go log into facebook. (Sign up if you don’t have an account). Find some Boomer who voted for Biden in the 2020 primaries and tell them that was a stupid decision.

  • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Negotiating drug prices? How about making price gouging ILLEGAL? How about a world market price for drugs instead of a monopoly market in America?

    I can go through the entire list like this. Trying to cheer for these crumbs is contortion at it’s most contorting.

    • heavy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I mean, I’m with you that would be great, but the President isn’t a dictator. I don’t know why this keeps coming up, I don’t want one person having the power to make huge sweeping decisions because they feel like it.

      Holding the president to an impossible standard is only going to hurt getting where we’re trying to go here.

    • Fedizen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Comparably he’s doing more stuff than obama with less legislative backing. I think, in general, US presidents are going to be shit piles no matter what until our electoral system undergoes some changes (probably first at the state constitution level)

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    The problem with those is the maggat adherents in the repuglican ranks. Get rid of those and good things will happen

  • EatATaco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    All of these are reported in “corporate news.”

    This is the beauty of not consuming the MSM, you can believe it has reported on or not reported on whatever you want.

    • Optional@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      What do you believe ‘headlines’ to be in this instance? Any mention whatsoever?

      • EatATaco@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        First, let me point out how interesting it is that I was clearly responding to your title, but instead you are trying to defend the words that Reich used in the tweet.

        But anyway, your title says “no corporate news story.” That literally means no mention whatsoever, but I would fairly interpret that as meaning that it’s buried or there little to no mention of it. Which is untrue, I mainly consume “corporate media” for, as biased as they are, they are still hundreds of times less biased and more reliable than other news “sources” I’ve come across. And these are all things I’ve know about from my typical news consumption (with the exception of OT expansion, this is the first I’ve heard of that). So I disagree with your “no corporate news” claim. I think it’s actually patently false.

        What Reich here means is that they aren’t the main news stories of the day. None of these single things is ever going to be, on it’s own, the biggest news of the day. But it’s the constant little steps that are good. And it’s not like these are being hidden, it’s just that none of them are going to be as popular as the main news stories of the day so they aren’t getting the same traction.

  • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Capping credit card fees? At what, 25%?

    35% APR, compounded DAILY?

    What fees are we talking about? They’re already cash-it-here high. It’s there something worse than that? Is the president making their interest remain at a reasonable amount above prime?

    Now THAT WOULD be a cap worth bragging about.

    PS: How about cash-it-here, and title-loan, and buy-here-pay-here, and instant-refund tax preparers, and accident attorneys, and bail bonds, and pawn shops, and rent-a-centers, and dollar tree/dollar general, and all the other predatory bad-financial-decision institutions we allow to thrive in poverty-stricken areas?

    We know what we’re doing, and we just let that shit happen. Fuck us, we deserve whatever comes.

    • FreddyDunningKruger@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      Oh look at you, the brains of the operation here. Do you know what the Republicans would have capped it at? NOTHING AT ALL. Do you know why the Democrats can’t deliver the perfect policies you demand? Because they have to fight against the other side tooth and nail to get anything through at all. Do you think the Republicans would be forgiving student loan debt right now? News flash: hell no. Do you have complaints about the way loans are being forgiven, oh of that I have no doubt. Do you know why you have those complaints? Because the Republicans are always chipping away and fighting against at every good thing that happens.

      You’d be that spoiled brat whose single mother comes home after working her ass off all day, and throws a fit because she made potato soup again when you wanted hamburgers, wouldn’t you?

      • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        2 years ago

        Thanks for the tongue lashing, but I’m reacting to something. This shitty list and big downvote party.

        This was posted like a kid’s picture stuck on the fridge, and we’re supposed to all admire it. Fuck that. Don’t take me to a Dodge and tell me it’s a Mercedes.

        He’s not Trump. That’s the line. Nobody is moved by this post. It’s desperate. It’s pleading. And ultimately, it actually works AGAINST Biden’s reelection. Because it’s like telling a girl who’s rejecting you all the reasons she should love you.

  • LotrOrc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    2 years ago

    Yet when the people ask to not be owned by corporations, to have medical care, to not commit genocide, that all falls on deaf ears.

    When wall Street wants something done, Biden jumps to it.

    These are all sticking little plasters on the giant gaping wound and saying that you fixed it

  • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    2 years ago

    Thank you for allowing people with crippling medical debt to get more debt.

    This is the help they didn’t know they wanted

    • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      Thank you for allowing people with crippling medical debt to still have the opportunity to get a decent loan for a vehicle or a house.

      • Ozzah@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 years ago

        No, they’re right. The last thing anyone in crippling debt of any kind needs is more debt of any kind.

        This is a bad solution.

        A good solution would be for people not to go into crippling medical debt in the first place.

      • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m sure the mortgage brokers and realtors and car dealers and banks and corporate auto loan companies are happy too.

        But how about addressing the REAL problem?