• @HiobsTriops@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    162 months ago

    Hawking was probably way more familiar with the works, achievements and maybe even personal anecdotes of everyone in this post than I could ever hope to be. Thus, sitting down with him feels like the best deal.

    • @cynar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 months ago

      He could give lectures, but the computer massively slowed conversations. He also apparently had a bit of a temper. Some of his colleagues took to wearing steel toe cap shoes because of him (electric wheelchairs are heavy).

    • @lunarul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 months ago

      Exactly what I was thinking. Plus he seemed to have a good sense of humor too. But on the other hand, it would take him much longer to respond to questions on the spot (usually he’d prepare answers ahead of time for interviews and such).

  • Steve Dice
    link
    fedilink
    English
    162 months ago

    Feynman. Dude must have some crazy stories. Seriously, who cares about science?

  • @agent_nycto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    122 months ago

    Leonardo to blow his mind and maybe make a time paradox

    Tesla to explain to him that he really needs to take some financial advice because it’s not about him, it’s about people using his techniques.

    Edison to punch in the face repeatedly for an hour

    • @Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 months ago

      Maybe Hawkings wheelchair battery died, and you are at the bus stop. What’s he going to do? Say no? See, he would never say no…because of the implication.

  • Lemminary
    link
    fedilink
    English
    152 months ago

    Alan Turing, the father of modern computer science. I’d also probably s his d because he’s technically a dilf. 🫦

  • @ragas@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    182 months ago

    Einstein.

    He was a generally great guy and had very progressive social views, so it would be fun to talk to him about the current state of the world.

    Also a lot of his theories around relativity and theories of quantum physics have been proven recently. It would be amazing to see his mind be blown when he realises both sides were right and what that means for how a theory of everything needs to look like.

    • @captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 months ago

      Yeah I’d love to discuss just the world and life with him.

      Curie would be fun too.

      Keep Newton away from me. And wasn’t hawking on the epstein island?

      • @phx@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 months ago

        As far as ones who actually did things there I’m not sure that Hawking would have even been physically capable at a point where he was famous.

        • @Bloomcole@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 months ago

          Hawking was such a feminist he didn’t want to see women get on their knees.
          And he was so smart he figured out kids don’t have to!

    • @parricc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 months ago

      To say he was a generally great guy really overlooks how awful he was to women. He was no doubt brilliant, but he had some very serious character flaws. And unfortunately, he had an echo chamber of peers and a rockstar celebrity status that only worked to reinforce his shitty behavior and backwards views. It’s not super uncommon for brilliant people to be absolutely nightmares on a personal level. Imagine being an absolutely brilliant scientist that gets married only to be completely forbidden from science and the things you love, and then reduced to being a maid for a madman with tons of insanely particular demands.

  • Frezik
    link
    fedilink
    English
    292 months ago

    Feynman, over a beer, at a strip club.

  • @Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    782 months ago

    Are they time traveling to see me, or am I time traveling to see them?

    Because if it’s the latter, Hawking on June 28, 2009.

  • @bazzett@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    9
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    As a biologist, I’m offended that there isn’t Darwin, nor Mayr, nor Lesquereux, nor Jay Gould nor Margulis.

    So I take Leonardo. I also like to draw and paint. I would like to say Marie, but unfortunately I’m not immune to radiation.

  • @stelelor@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    232 months ago

    Feynman, mainly because he was an amazing professor and knows how to talk to people.

    Einstein and Newton disliked people, so they would be terrible conversationslists outside their areas of expertise. I think that was true of Leonardo as well. Edison is also out because he was a dick.

    • @Jankatarch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      You could absolutely blow leonardo’s mind away with modern knowledge such as “washing hands before performing surgery is good actually”

    • @drath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 months ago

      Feynman’s way overrated, though. Sure, he was a smart enough guy to land a job on Manhattan project and university prof afterwards, but the only reason people know him are the books written by batshit crazy groupies (he didn’t write any) and based on his elderly ramblings, so none of the stories in those are even remotely true.

    • @adhocfungus@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 months ago

      I was going to say Feynman for the same reason. Outside his classes it sounds like the guy was a lot of fun to be around.