• dan1101@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    329
    ·
    11 months ago

    That’s weird, I thought I used SQL databases from government agencies regularly. Guess I was mistaken.

  • i_stole_ur_taco@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    296
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Elon’s shock and fury about the database key sounds like he got a report from an out-of-breath 20 year old DOGE kid who thinks they’re hot shit and discovered some massive flaw.

    Elon also seems like the kind of person that believes a database schema is all that’s needed to govern a population.

    • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Database schema = “Not fraudulant”, what’s so hard about that? Login credentials don’t even need to be encrypted if you say no fraud before you log in, and cross your fingers. It’s basic programming knowledge, come on man. Also throw some salt over shoulder and slaughter a goat for good measure just in case.

        • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          11 months ago

          You joke, but one of the programs at my work we use legit doesn’t need credentials, just a username. That one’s a head scratcher to me.

          • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Would that almost be OK if it were like 40 characters long? Like, you can view any photo on Google Photos if you have the right alphanumeric string

            Would still be saved insecurely in password managers and other issues though

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Login? Why would I do that? Aren’t the credentials in the code? I just hit the go button.

      • renzev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Login credentials don’t even need to be encrypted if you say no fraud before you log in, and cross your fingers

        Don’t forget to unset the evil bit as well!

  • CodexArcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    228
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I’m sure folks on here know this, but you know, there’s also that 10K a day that don’t so…

    What makes this especially funny, to me, is that SSN is the literal text book example (when I was in school anyway) of a “natural” key that you absolutely should never use as a primary key. It is often the representative example of the kinds of data that seems like it’d make a good key but will absolutely fuck you over if you do.

    SSN is not unique to a person. They get reused after death, and a person can have more than one in their lifetime (if your id is stolen and you arduously go about getting a new one). Edit: (See responses) It seems I’m misinformed about SSNs, apologies. I have heard from numerous sources that they are not unique to a person, but the specifics of how it happens are unknown to me.

    And they’re protected information due to all the financials that rely on them, so you don’t really want to store them at all (unless you’re the SSA, who would have guessed that’d ever come up though!?)

    It’s so stupid that it would be hilarious if people weren’t dying.

      • mesa@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        11 months ago

        It doesn’t. There is no truely unique ID in the US.

        Source: myself. Worked on health insurance and it was hell.

        • CodexArcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s wild too. I’ve been in the hospital a lot lately and in addition to a bar-code wristband, every healthcare worker, before doing anything with me (the patient) will ask my full name and either birthday or address and then double-check it against the wrist band. This is to make sure, at every step, that they didn’t accidentally swap in some other patient with the same name. (Not so uncommon, lots of men have their father’s name.)

          Meanwhile in like Iceland, everyone gets assigned a personal GPG key at birth so you can just present you public cert as identification, not to mention send private messages and secure your state-assigned crypto-wallet. Not saying such a system is without flaw but it seems a lot better than what we’re doing!

          • jacksilver@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            11 months ago

            You want them to do that regardless of the how the country keeps track of individuals. The point of all that asking is to make sure they have the right patient for the right procedure.

            You don’t want to have something amputated or removed unless you have to.

            • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 months ago

              This has happened many times. In the last city I lived in, a man went in to have a leg amputated and they got the wrong one, so he ended up with zero legs.

          • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            11 months ago

            This is a joke right? I really really hope that they aren’t trusting randoms to know how to manage a gpg key properly.

            It’s hard enough to get people actually interested in it to do it correctly.

            And using gpg to constantly identify yourself would mean needing to keep multiple copies of your private key all over the place. I find it unlikely that regular people are issuing new keys and revocation certs properly. Not to mention having canonical key servers (maybe the government could manage that, but the individual is responsible for maintaining a way to get the canonical most up to date key)

            Using gpg backfires because if you lose access to the key or it’s compromised (say by putting it on your phone) you lose everything. They work for people who know what they are doing because you are supposed to issue keys for specific tasks and identities, but there is just no way that that is happening.

      • kerrigan778@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        11 months ago

        The SSN is supposed to just be a number that you give your employers and the IRS so that your social security (the USs blanket retirement savings/pension system) contributions get logged correctly to you and then when you retire you can use that number to get the social security benefits that you paid into. The number has ended up being used for all sorts of things because the USA is slightly broken because it is SORT OF a unique ID number for each US citizen, except of course that it wasn’t intended to be that, SSNs are only supposed to be used from first social security contribution (first paycheck) to last social security payout (death) so naturally they can just be recycled.

          • CodexArcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            11 months ago

            He’s complaining that a number isn’t unique and is being poorly used, but the number isn’t supposed to be unique and he’s complaining that it’s not being used in a way that experts are specifically warned not to use it in.

            But on a second, stupider layer, this is the system those numbers originate from. So however they use them is how they’re supposed to be used.

            But then, back above that first stupid layer, on an even more basic and surface level degree of stupid, the government definitely uses SQL databases. It uses just… so many of them.

        • CodexArcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          This is a good summary. I had to go pull up wikipedia on it since I roughly knew that social security was a national insurance/pension kind of system but am actually hazy on details.

          The major issue with it as id (aside from DBA’s gripes about it) is that credit agencies and banks started to rely on it for credit scores and loans. You see, the US has a social scoring system (what we always accuse China of) but the only thing it tracks is how reliable you are about paying off debts. So with your home address, name, and SSN, basically anyone can take out loans or credit cards in your name. This will then damage your credit score, making it harder to get loans, buy a home, rent property, or even get a job.

          That’s why Americans are always concerned about having our identity stolen: because you don’t need a lot of info to financially ruin someone’s life.

    • Zannsolo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s supposed to be unique and might actually be now, but there are def duplicate ssns out there. Craziest identity situation I was told by a project manager of government system that is all about identities. Same First, Same last,same Date of Birth, same SSN; different people.

      • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        Weird story, and I have to assume this is data entry error, identity theft, or something else: I couldn’t sign up for a hospital billing platform because my name and full birthdate (including year) conflicted with someone else in the system. I called the hospital billing department and they were very confused about the whole situation. It didn’t really get resolved, and I basically had to let it go to collections so that I could pay because of the shitty system. I don’t have a very common name, and never have had this problem before.

      • CodexArcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’m hardly the king of databases, but always using a surrogate key (either an auto-incremented integet or a random uuid) has done me pretty well over the years. I had to engineer a combination of sequential timestamp with a hash extension as a key for one legacy system (keys had to be unique but mostly sequential), and an append-only log store would have been a better choice than an RDBMS, but sometimes you make it work with what you have.

        Natural keys are almost always a bad idea though. SSNs aren’t natural, which is one pitfall: implicitly relying on someone else’s data practices by assuming their keys are natural. But also, nature is usually both more unique than you want (every snowflake is technically unique) and less than you’d hoped (all living things share quite a lot of DNA). Which means you end up relying on how good your taxonomy is for uniqueness. As opposed to surrogate keys, which you can assure the uniqueness of, by definition, for your needs.

    • hope@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      SSNs are not reissued after death and never have been. I’ve been seeing a lot of people comment this, but I’m not sure where they’re getting it from. (They’re not unique for other reasons, however.)

    • asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Just curious, but if SSNs were not recycled after death, would there be any reason not to use them as a primary key?

      • franzfurdinand@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        They’re sequential, so the values above and below yours are valid SSNs of people born in the same hospital around the same time.

        This would make it trivially easy to get access to records you shouldn’t

        • asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 months ago

          Isn’t that assuming you have access to doing arbitrary SQL queries on the database? Then you’d by definition have access to records you shouldn’t.

          • borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            No. You can have control over specific parameters of an SQL query though. Look up insecure direct object reference vulnerabilities.

            Consider a website that uses the following URL to access the customer account page, by retrieving information from the back-end database: https://insecure-website.com/customer_account?customer_number=132355 Here, the customer number is used directly as a record index in queries that are performed on the back-end database. If no other controls are in place, an attacker can simply modify the customer_number value, bypassing access controls to view the records of other customers.

    • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      (if your id is stolen and you arduously go about getting a new one)

      I thought I had lost mine once and got a new SSN card, they don’t give you a new number, it’s the same number

      • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        11 months ago

        I kind of doubt it. It’s been known that he’s a fraud of a coder for a while, that seems like a clear riff.

        Enough that I was really disappointed when Some More News talked about Zip2 like he was the sole founder and therefore must have been good at coding at some point.

        Btw, the guy he and his brother founded the company with died at 51.

        As a megarich techie… With the dirt on Elon’s real capabilities.

        Interesting.

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          ·
          11 months ago

          IIRC they kicked him out of PayPal because he wanted to run everything on windows instead of the Unix/Linux servers they were running on. And the reason for it was because he couldn’t figure out Linux.

  • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    156
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    You know, the thing that always seemed really scary about the OG Nazis is that they were competent, intelligent, put-together people that were just fucking evil. Then you look at the US Nazis and the fucking bozo density is off the charts, but they seem to be succeeding anyway.

    Three possibilities come to mind:

    • These bozos are going to find out, hard and soon.
    • The OG Nazis were actually bozos too.
    • Competence and intelligence doesn’t actually matter in running a fascist regime
      • CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        60
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        They were more competent bozos. They ran Germany the way that your stupid friend gets laid more often because they aren’t smart enough to be embarrassed by themselves and they know only one goal.

        Whereas these guys run America like an ugly stupid person that insists that no, actually, they have already in fact convinced you to sleep with them despite what your words say and the goal is to confuse you into bed.

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          37
          ·
          11 months ago

          The best decision that nazis ever made was not to indiscriminately purge the military and bureaucracy. Purges certainly did happen but they were focused on the political class and very targeted elsewhere.

          They kept the systems people depended on running well to not immediately create massive public backlash… they also got lucky as hell. The military and populace were deeply bitter after WW1 and they leveraged grand gestures to great effect while changing relatively little administratively. The fucks in the US are making flaccid grand gestures while tearing down systems people actually depend on.

      • naught101@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        11 months ago

        Is it also a case of survivorship bias? Like, I am not super versed in Nazi history, but… There are famous “smart” Nazis like Goebbels and Himmler and Speer - are they only well known because a) they slowly emerged as influential and/or b) it became clear years later that they were the ones behind the wheel?

        'Cause I do think that trump and musk are dumb as bricks, but I don’t think Steve Bannon is, and there are probably others like him…

          • freebee@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            11 months ago

            I’m no expert, but this podcast series seems to suggest Von Braun was mainly very focused on shooting rockets to the moon and fiddling the right guys to get crazy amounts of funding for that goal. I’m not saying he wasn’t a nazi, he was, but exterminating jews etc was probably not his mean focus in life… In the Von Braun case it was propaganda towards his own leaders, to get lots of money. The reason he’s well remembered is not propaganda but because what he tried actually worked out very well and was the basis for pretty much every rocket since. If he’ld happen to live in Soviet Russia, he would probably have become a member of the communist party, whatever would get him more money/free labor for shooting new trials towards space.

      • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        The high leadership were absolute bozos, except for their propaganda guy (Goebel?). And at the lower levels, they had good engineering (still do). Thankfully the higher ups were more interested in building an über-weapon (because that’s good propaganda) than actually winning the war.

        Let’s hope the current crop of nazis se their downfall faster. Actually, fuck hope. Let’s make them.

    • Snapz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      11 months ago

      The nazis weren’t as competent and intelligent as you suggest, that work was outsourced to IBM - Yes, that IBM.

      You know that Watson product that IBM sells and advertises so often? R one that plays chess and was on jeopardy (Fun!) Turns out that Watson was the name of the dude that signed off on them accelerating the Holocaust for the nazis. Some believe the nazis couldn’t have been nearly as efficient at unrepentant large scale murder without IBM joining the fray, yet they skate on by…

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      It’s absolutely the second one. They basically all had brain damage from ww1 (who knew explosions are bad for you) and several of them including Hitler were drugged the fuck up. Julius Streicher was a clown, but not like a funny or sad clown, more like pathetic, like honestly comparable to someone from 8chan. Goebbels was a creepy loser. Hitler was a meth addict with ibs and anger issues who spent his last days just destroying the air quality of the bunker he would die in and kept invading countries despite already being at war. Heidrich died by personally chasing after antifascists who happened to have a grenade. And that’s not touching on their archeological or spiritual beliefs which are on par with qanon for believability and sensibility

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yep, the actual competence was basically in the army (inherited from a long military tradition), so it’s important that those generals don’t cave.

      • Klear@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Heidrich died by personally chasing after antifascists who happened to have a grenade.

        That’s a fucked up way to describe the assassination.

    • LePoisson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      11 months ago

      Hopefully all 3 but as the other poster said, Nazis really were clowns.

      Sure, Hitler had some early successes militarily - combined arms blitzkrieg was a new deal and effective - but it’s not like that won the war. Besides which there is just so much dumbass occult bullshit going on in the background with the Nazis like you would not believe.

      You don’t need to be smart or super competent to get a bunch of people killed. You just need enough people willing to pull the triggers and for the rest of the people to go along. Going along is easy until it ends with shit like the Holocaust.

    • AGreenPurple@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      11 months ago

      Just look at the military decisions Hitler made, that was luckily an incompetent guy thinking he’s smarter than everyone else. That rings a bell, doesn’t it?

      In the long run, making less stupid decisions wouldn’t most likely have changed the outcome, but even more people would likely have died (and unfortunately the people executing the murder of the Jews weren’t as incompetent as their glorious leader).

    • BassTurd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      11 months ago

      I think some of the more intelligent US Nazis are letting the bozos do their thing and riding the coat-tails and avoiding direct blame if things turn. I’m looking at a good chunk of the House and Senate.

    • Preston Maness ☭@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      You know, the thing that always seemed really scary about the OG Nazis is that they were competent, intelligent, put-together people that were just fucking evil. Then you look at the US Nazis and the fucking bozo density is off the charts, but they seem to be succeeding anyway.

      Not every fascist and Nazi needed to be competent, intelligent, and put-together. Just enough of them. I suppose we’ll find out in real-time if they have amassed sufficient numbers this go 'round.

    • athairmor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      11 months ago

      Elon and DOGE should really look into all of those Oracle contracts the Fed pays for. Must be all inefficiency and fraud.

        • athairmor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          11 months ago

          It would be one of the areas that would save the government a bunch of money. But, Ellison is in the Trump camp so it’s not going to happen.

          • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            If Oracle works for the application and you want to save money, you’ll stick to SQL. Probably Postgres, MySQL, or MariaDB.

            • Tja@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              All of those are open source, so nothing to sell really (well, except MySQL, which is Oracle).

              EnterpriseDB is the closest you can get to “selling” Postgres.

        • athairmor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          11 months ago

          Access can do (some) SQL! 😱

          I’ve worked for US federal government, access to Access* was the only way I could do some things that wasn’t torture… severe torture.

          *keep in mind that SQL is a query language. It can be implemented in different ways and not necessarily within an RDMS.

  • GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    116
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Elon starting to comment on technical matters was the moment I learned he was actually completely beyond incompetent, since I have some actual expertise on the subject. Right around the time he bought Twitter and commented publicly on its architecture.

    This is further evidence to that point

    • runner_g@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      11 months ago

      His response to the 2018 Thai Cave rescue is what made me realize how big of a shit stain on society he is.

  • Jorn@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    102
    ·
    11 months ago

    He got community-noted for being wrong. Per usual, it’s only a matter of time before he deletes his post.

    • IMALlama@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      11 months ago

      That sounds surprising modern. That’s good! Or at least I would think it is good. So many things run on mainframes still.

        • IMALlama@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Haha, TIL that SQL is 51 years old. IBM mainframes were still all the rage in the 70s. My assumption is that government would have not been an early adopter, but I could obviously be wrong.

    • suy@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      11 months ago

      Ah, a classic watch. :-)

      Elon probably thinks that SQL is MS SQL Sever, MySQL, or some such.

      • 9point6@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        11 months ago

        Elon probably thinks

        Not really sure he does, I think he’s clearly paying others to do that for him

        • suy@programming.devOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          My bad, I forgot he doesn’t have time to think.

          Too busy being one of the best players at Path of Exile 2. Despite that he doesn’t identify the valuable loot. Or how to use the map. Or how levels work. But he’s top 50! All very believable.

    • pixxelkick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      They probably do use lots of NoSQL DBs too, which perform better for non relational “data lake” style architectures where you just wanna dump mountains of data as fast as possible into storage, to be perused later.

      When you have cases where you have very very high volume of data in, but very low need to query it (but some potential need, just very low), nosql DBs excel

      Stuff like census data where you just gotta legally store it for historical reasons, and very rarely some person will wanna query it for a study or something.

      Keep in mind when I talk about low need to query, the opposite high need us on the scale of like, "this db gets queried multiple times per minute’

      Stuff like… logins to a website, data that gets queried many times per minute or even second, then sometimes nosql DBs fall off.

      Depends what is queried.

      Super basic “lookup by ID” Stuff that operates as just a big ole KeyValuePair mapping ID -> Value? And thats all you gotta query?

      NoSql is still the right tool for the job.

      The moment any kind of JOIN enters the discussion though, chances are you actually wanna use sql now

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Just so you know census data is very heavily queried. Everything from civil engineering to economics wants to look at that dataset every day.

        • pixxelkick@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          Like I said, in the scale compared to actual high frequency data though, that’s still be infrequent.

          High frequency DBs are on the scale of many queried per second

          Even with tonnes of data scientists and engineers querying the data, that’s still in the scale of queries per minute, which is low frequency in the data world.

          • Maggoty@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I wouldn’t put it past them to experience numbers in the per second realm, especially as new data posts and everyone is rushing to grab it.

  • شاهد على إبادة@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Isn’t Oracle a big government supplier with millions if not billions worth of contracts?

    Elon is a fraud but for someone who claims he created one of the Web’s first e-commerce sites this level of ignorance is embarrassing

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    11 months ago

    Lmao we’re gonna get to watch eel-on-musk and all of his dipshit wünderkinds speedrun through all of the pitfalls a junior DBA / data engineer is liable to make, and they’re gonna do it on prod, and prod is the US government.

    What could possibly go wrong

      • notabot@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        11 months ago

        An UPDATE without a WHERE clause that doesn’t get noticed for a week or two. Your data’s hosed and you can’t really cope with reverting to your last known good backup. Bonus points if you haven’t tested your recovery procedures recently. Then he runs around screeching about how the data is obviously fraudulent and he’s a genius for finding it.

    • Bob Robertson IX @discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      11 months ago

      He’s going to dedupe the social security databases, thinking that he’s screwing over trans people because he thinks they are the only people who change their names… not realizing that the vast majority of married women have at least two names associated with their SSN.

  • -☆-@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 months ago

    A government official known for performing a nazi salute just broadcast an ableist slur.

    Cool cool cool

    • Cargon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Civilized people should really coopt the word “removed” to mean Republican. I mean, they have the ® next to their names to remind us already.

      Then when someone takes offense you can just say

      Jesus Titty-Fucking Christ, Carol. Just because someone has a mental disability doesn’t make them a Republican!"

      • NuclearDolphin@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Way to throw disabled people under the bus because you aren’t clever enough to find another way to insult their intelligence.

        Also using the phrase “civilized people” makes you sound like you’d fit in with the other Republicans.

        • Cargon@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Jesus Titty-Fucking Christ, Carol. Just because someone has a mental disability doesn’t make them a Republican.

    • renzev@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      11 months ago

      btw do you know why it was decided to treat the r-word as an ableist slur? And why didn’t they also make “idiot” a slur, since it has basically the same etymology? Is this a lemmy-specific thing? I’ve never seen anyone use or interpret the r-word as a slur outside of lemmy

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        11 months ago

        In contemporary language, that word (among others) is almost entirely used as an insult by way of equating somebody’s intelligence with those who have intellectual disabilities, which creates a negative connotation. Similarly, this is why we don’t say things we dislike are “gay” anymore. It’s disrespectful to the people who actually fall under the definition, and it proliferates negative associations with traits that people are stuck living with and had no choice in acquiring.

        The only reason “idiot” hasn’t followed suit is because it’s much more culturally ingrained, and there’s hasn’t been as significant of an attempt to change it as with other words.

        I’ve never seen anyone use or interpret the r-word as a slur outside of lemmy

        It’s not exclusive to Lemmy, but it is mostly left-leaning spaces or gen Z individuals who see it that way. Center and right-leaning spaces see treating the word as a slur to be censorship (as opposed to being respectful of others) and keep using it or actively push back by saying it more.

      • Charapaso@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        Not Lemmy specific. There was US legislation related to the word being deemed offensive fifteen years ago (given the slow nature of Congress, it wasn’t a new sentiment then, either): https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rosa’s_Law

        Fair enough that plenty of insulting words could be cast as abelist: but my guess is that a word like “idiot” is old enough that most folks called that in a medical context aren’t around any more. Maybe I’m wrong though: plenty of folks do push against saying things like “crazy” in an insulting manner.