I don’t know what bumping uglies means, and I’m scared to ask…

It’s been years now, and I still haven’t found the exit.

You don’t ask a lady that. How rude.

I like this. I mean, the fact that the rules assist the narrative, but they’re not the narrative themselves.

For the desintegrate situation, I’d love for the GM to go something like:

“As you speak the final words of your incantation, Wizard, a thin green ray begins to form on your fingertip. The villain merely smirks, clicking his fingers. A wave of crimson energy smothers your hand, and your spell snuffs out like a candle. He brushes a piece of dust from his shoulder. 'Impatience. Such a childish trait. As I was saying…'”

The GM wouldn’t even explain what happened, just continue his narrative, and at some point the party would find that one of the nearby minions in hiding had a counterspell ready, for example.

That sounds unreasonable. If you’re stepping up to known thugs to threaten them with violence, violence is expected by the party. There should be no surprise here.

Pff.

Just caption an Airbus. Assuming you’re in flight, you just need the buttons to engage cat III auto landing, make wings bigger, make wheels stick out, and brakes after you land.

Aww. It’s such a quirky and funny thought, imagine eating the rubble as an intimidation attempt, like, the guy just missed but is trying to turn it into a “that was intentional, I wanted you to know what I’m going to do to your BRAIN after I cave in your skull!”

This is the kind of stuff that makes a game memorable IMO. As a DM, even if you don’t want to allow it for some reason, just go along with it. Fake a roll and have the opponent yell back “Bahahah I haven’t even hit you yet and you’re already getting ready to start shitting bricks?!”

I want this as a Dimension 20 series so bad.

Really curious in what scenarios people would be writing enums with months and weekdays.

Because short of developing yet another library to handle date and time, everything else is likely a disaster waiting to happen…

Ah so close. This comic should end with

“I did my own research”

I’m calling it now: the 9-banded armadillo will be adopted as Canada’s mascot in the next decade, after they become the main species in the Canadian deserts.

I would do this if a party was being obnoxious and constantly interrupting/sidetracking the storytelling.

“You missed the several ‘ELEVATOR’ signs as you were running away from the guards and the half of the town that Mr klepto over here decided to steal from, and that’s why You’ve been slogging thought these dull treetops and grappling with vines for the last 45 minutes.”

Same. Like with most articles, I read the abstract and skipped ahead to the conclusion - they couldn’t get sufficient data to prove their theory but further research looks promising.

Are they all your phones, or different house members? Can you “pool” your photos together?

We’ve been doing this with all our phones for a long time using nextcloud. I’d like to use a more photo-oriented app, but the last I tried it, it just wasn’t there yet.

Can’t rotate or do basic edits in web app, dead to me.

Also can’t really sync and share with rest of household. Auto sync to phones is also a must.

I was seriously unimpressed with its features, and I’m not bothering with it again anytime soon.

Sounds like a problem that would take care of itself, if they think it’s a good idea to pet a wild animal of monstrous size, then by all means let them.

The elusive Chocolate Starfish.

I’d take either kid, and cry from joy when you’re not looking. Love you - Dad.

fucking seatbelts do not play well with tits (how is this still a thing)

This sounds hard to solve, especially for women with fuller bosom. I’m assuming that the car has a mechanism that allows raising/lowering the seatbelt height, and that this didn’t solve the issue…

The answer would probably be a harness, like they use for racing, but it’s so inconvenient to use as to not actually being a solution to a boob-squashing neck-sawing strap.

I don’t think whether they’re driving or not is a meaningful distinction at this level

But it does! For example, if the driver seat offers better protection than the rest of the car, and women are more often than men in one of the other seats, it would explain the results and the dummy doesn’t add much.

But if the fatality rate for women in the front passenger seat, for example, is the same as for men in that same seat, that’s were probably having an “anatomically correct female crash test dummy” can be very helpful in understanding why these crashes are killing more women than men.