• Kroxx@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Team aluminum all the way. A higher up where I work is obsessed with stainless steel, he gets these monstrous heavy duty tables made out of SS that hold objects 1/3 of their weight. Makes lab rearranging a nightmare lol.

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 years ago

      Aluminum is where it’s at, and where it is, is everywhere.

      Your cans? Aluminum. Your car? Mostly aluminum. Old wiring, you better believe that’s aluminum. Your fucking phone screen is aluminum, sand paper is aluminum, half the birth stones are all aluminum let’s fucking goooo baybee

      • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Most cars are still steel. Source I work on cars in New England. So much rust, even on the ones with aluminum bodies, at least wherever it can touch a dissimilar metal and becomes a battery.

        And crucially the important parts that keep it from exploding (cylinder liners) and save you in a crash (crumple and bumper cores) are almost all steel. Because it deforms better with simpler engineering.

        See also iron brakes in most cars hardened steel bearings everywhere.

        • Wogi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          I was referring to the engine block and pistons being aluminum. I assume chassis and many of the critical spinning bits are still steel or iron.

          It’s also mostly a shit post. I’m a machinist and I am surrounded by aluminum in funny forms.

          • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Yeah I’m mostly just shitting on it for fun too. But the pistons don’t work very long without steel rings, wrist pins and big end bolts.

            The problem is we have to bring copper, brass and other fancy metals in them though, because the all spin on oil cushion bearings. Unless we’re talking Babbitt bushings from the early 1900s.

    • MeowZedong@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      If you really want to stop the stainless steel obsession, you could start cleaning the benches with bleach and not rinsing again afterwards. The corrosion will set in quickly.

      Aluminum will stain, but it won’t start rusting.

      • dogsoahC@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’ll just get a spray bottle of mercury and fuck your aluminium assface right up.

        • MeowZedong@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          We seem to be at an impasse, my stainless steel ass face. How about a compromise: we return to asbestos!

    • abraham_linksys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Us Americans are too excited about making stuff with our Uh-loo-min-um that we just skip pronouncing some of the vowels

      • VonCesaw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        2 years ago

        Guy that named it called it Aluminum

        Weirdo types that decided they were in charge of naming things decided to name it Aluminium so it “matched” the likes of other metals like titanium, iridium, etc

        • hessenjunge@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Guy that named it called it Aluminum, Alumium, and Aluminium. Aluminium stuck, even in the US.

          Then some weirdo types decided they were in charge of naming things in the US decided it needs to be Aluminum. It took them about 50-90 years to succeed.

        • lud@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          And thanks for that. Aluminum is a stupid ass name.

        • Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          No, the guy who discovered it called it Alumium, after Alum. Both Aluminum and Aluminium were later constructions by journals on opposite sides of the pond.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          2 years ago

          Guy that named it called it Aluminum

          Let me guess: you pronounce GIF as Jif just because the creator is a peanut butter obsessed weirdo who couldn’t pronounce “graphics”?

          • PoopingCough@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            2 years ago

            couldn’t pronounce “graphics”

            That’s not how acronym pronunciation works though. We don’t pronounce them based on the words they stand for, otherwise we would pronounce NASA, SCUBA, LASER, etc. differently. Both pronunciations have valid arguments so why can’t we just accept both and stop being weird about it.

            • dditty@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              Because I arbitrarily decided it’s gif 13 years ago and anyone who says it the other way is wrong 😡😡😡

  • sparkle@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 years ago

    I can’t think of many things you encounter every day that just use straight iron. Only alloys that use iron

    Meanwhile, you’ll use very pure aluminum all the time

      • HauntedCupcake@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 years ago

        Uh, I hate to break it to you, but literally all the iron in the human body is either part of a protein or bound to other molecules. It’s not an alloy per se, but it isn’t exactly pure iron

    • labsin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Pure aluminium is only used when you need to have very little reactivity.

      General construction steel has >98% weight iron. Around the same as most aluminium alloys.

      • sparkle@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Really now? I thought most steel had way more carbon & chromium/nickel/manganese than that. I guess I underestimate how little is needed to make iron no longer mushy.

    • Ohmmy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Sounds like aluminum is a loner and iron plays well with others. I’d bet there is still more iron encountered every day than aluminum even if the aluminum is pure and the iron is alloyed.

    • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Perhaps so, but one might argue that human tech relies more on iron than any other metal - because of its magnetic properties. We need iron to generate and manipulate electricity.

  • Yambu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    I still can’t believe there’s people pronouncing it aluminium instead of aluminium

    • sm1dger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      The same people who presumably fill balloons with helum, want to cut down on sodum in their diet, prevent Iran from refining uranum, power their phones with lithum batteries, and enjoy singing David Guetta’s house classic Titanum

  • moshankey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    As a former cyclist, steel is real. I’ve seen aluminum bikes fail (as in, break at the top and down tube)during a ride. Screw your aluminum!

    • Maalus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      Aluminium doesn’t get stronger on the welds like steel does, it gets weaker. So if you screw them up, you end up with a two part bike

      • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        While I agree, I do have to clarify that there is a fatigue limit, it’s mainly that the limit for steel increases so fast that few people are willing to put in the testing for billions of cycles to model ultra-high cycle fatigue

        • Eheran@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Where is that limit supposed to be? The line does not flatten, unlike that of steel. Which is a flat line from 1 million to 1 billion cycles. During the same number of cycles, aluminium drops from 25 to 14 ski, a loss of 44 %. The article specifically mentions:

          Some metals such as ferrous alloys and titanium alloys have a distinct limit, whereas others such as aluminium and copper do not and will eventually fail even from small stress amplitudes.

          • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            Head’s up, referring to it as a “limit” like your article did is incorrect. In engineering you have what’s called an S-N diagram, which plots out the average time to failure based on average cyclic stress. Basically, a lower avaerage stress results in a higher average life. Also, this plot uses a logarithmic scale for both axis, because then all of the plots are straight lines.

            For steel, the S-N diagram has what’s called the “knee”, which is where you have two distinct lines in the S-N curve: one horizontal and one at an angle, with the two intersecting at 1 million cycles. Referring to the knee as a limit (like in the article) is wrong because it’s not a limit; it’s the threshold where if you design a part to last beyond that (aka less cyclic stress than would get 1 million cycles) then it practically lasts forever.

            In reality, the part won’t actually last forever, since the S-N curve beyond 1 million cycles isn’t perfectly horizontal. It’s just that reducing your cyclic stress quickly increases your predicted life into billions or even trillions of cycles. This is known as ultra-high cycle fatigue, and it’s generally impractical to do all the testing required to model because each sample would take months to test on the low end. Plus, there’s little demand for such models in the industry, though there are a handful of PhD students and post-docs working on it

            • Eheran@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              Does that change anything regarding the discussion? If the limit is quickly so high that it is beyond reasonable time spans? In the comparison at hand, aluminium has no fatigue limit, steel does. They still use aluminium for aircraft etc. due to the superior weight savings.

              • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                Does that change anything regarding the discussion?

                Yes, because the term “fatigue limit” makes lay people think the exact opposite of what is intended.