Server indexes of places for newcomers to join can be instrumental for Fediverse adoption. However, sudden rule changes can leave some admins feeling pressure to change policies in order to remain listed.

  • noodle (he/him)@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    any other instance allowing all the racist, homophobic and transphobic shit that gets posted on Threads would be unanimously defederated by the biggest players on the Fediverse, and blasted all over the network under the fediblock hashtag, but Meta somehow gets the pass because… more number mean gooder?

    • iquanyin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      all i see on mine (i just tried it this week) is cute videos, artist videos, life hack videos, and amazing videos. seriously. it’s a lot like discuit. i guess it’s all in what you follow.

    • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s because Facebook has been pushing their PR saying “We’re not an alt-right cesspit, we don’t tolerate alt-right trolling” people including right wingers believe them and repeat these lies, then they proceed to turn a blind eye towards right wing trolling and bigotry because they know that most of their audience are right wingers themselves (I mean that should be obvious since Facebook is known as the boomer platform because all the young people left elsewhere).

    • Steven Saus@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I get this argument… but I keep seeing folks talk about Threads as if it’s somehow an existential threat to Mastodon rather than “big crappy instance with asshats on it,” and I don’t quite understand how it’s more than that… at least at a level that users and instance admins have any influence over. Can someone ELI5?

    • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      2 years ago

      how can threads be transphobic when my following feed is filled with trans people? id say it’s more trans friendly than mastodon.

  • million@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Are any major Lemmy or Mastodon instances in Fedi Garden?

    I was looking through the site and didn’t see any instances I recognized but they also nest everything so it takes like 3 clicks to see 2 severs.

    Edit: By type looks like the easier way to see the entire list, which is not huge and I don’t recognize any of the servers but I will admit I am not a big Mastodon person.

  • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    2 years ago

    No way! Little dictators exercising the power they have. But it is their platform, they can do what they want right?

    This is probably the biggest threat to the fediverse.

          • GlitterInfection@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            28
            arrow-down
            16
            ·
            2 years ago

            Bullying instance admins into aligning with your values is absolutely the type of behavior that will ruin this protocol.

            Meta is evil and Threads is lame. And I can block them on my own, thank you.

            • Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              28
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              2 years ago

              “Not linking to you on my personal website is bullying”

              Give it a fucking break precious.

              Co-ordinated action is needed to fight back against billion dollar companies, not leaving it up to individuals.

    • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      They are not threatening the fediverst though are they? Just refusing to promote certain instances for newcomers. When I signed up, i wasn’t really sure what I was signing up to but i did assume that not all instances were listed on that page that talked about them

      • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        2 years ago

        Little dictators that have too much prominence and visibility are the threats. If a specific start point gets too prominent a lot of users could be redirected from good instances because of the little tyrants that run such a jump on point. Granted it can be easily routes around by offering alternative entry points, but a certain amount of prominence will impact not so Tech savvy users.

        And in your assumption you have shown you already understand the fediverse more than a lot of people ever will. They will just join an instance and browse /ALL.

    • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      The above is the core strength of the fediverse. Tinpot despots may have an advantage in the network due to previous efforts, but they can be routed around any time they go nuts.

      This is a huge, huge win over the top down shitbergs that is current corporate social media.

      • RubberDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        2 years ago

        I think this is true, but the fediverse (as an entity) needs to prevent too much power accumulating at one point.

        • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 years ago

          It ebbs and flows. Full decentralization would be ideal, but unrealistic. Power always consolidates, until it suddenly doesnt. Making it easy to leave when it “suddenly doesnt” is key.

    • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I am not in favor of transitive property defederation either but Meta will make similar demands if they are allowed to be an influencer in the fedi as well. I’d rather that everyone just decides to defederate threads independently

  • iquanyin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 years ago

    seems a big against the sprit of “let each instance choose.” al ost like having a corporation control the choices available.

    • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      No, you’re misunderstanding the nature of the Fediverse. The fediverse concept centers around independent servers interconnecting and communicating with each other over activitypub, not all servers everywhere, just simply independent servers (AKA there is room for defederation and bans in that model). There will be servers which choose not to or won’t be allowed to interconnect and that isn’t antithetical to the goal because the goal is having servers be able to do it. If you were told that fediverse means all activitypub servers interconnect they were either misunderstanding or lying.

    • catnash [she/her, ae/aer]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      The nature of the fediverse is that it’s federative/defederative. If an instance chooses to defederate because it thinks federation is a risk then they can do that. If that causes a problem for a user, the user can move to another instance which does federate.

      I joined the fediverse after years of bad experiences on more typical social media sites, and specifically lemmy.blahaj.zone instance because the admins are very good at weeding out transphobia. If they federated with Threads I would be very surprised and want them to convince me of why that was a good idea.

  • cosmicrookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    In the end, on paper, it results to more active users because they will use their main account that they created innitially and simply have a new account to access the blocked content on other insurances

  • tutus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    The solution to this is to create a new index (sorry web page). Job done.

    Groups who abuse their position should be ignored. Without traffic their influence disappears.