• @Umbrias@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      1610 months ago

      The internet is a funny analogue!

      Because it experienced the dot com crash under almost the same sort of circumstances.

    • TehPers
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2010 months ago

      You’re right. Once it settles into its niches and the hype dies down, it won’t be overhyped anymore because everyone will have moved on.

      I’ve been working with generative AI for years now and we still struggle to solve real world problems with it. It isn’t useless or anything. It’s way too unreliable, and this isn’t one of those things where time will solve it - it’s being used to solve problems that have no perfect solutions, like human interfacing and generating culturally-appropriate and visually-accurate images. I’d expect it to improve at those tasks over time, but the scope needs to drop from every problem humanity has ever faced to the problems that these models are good at solving.

      • @Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        1010 months ago

        Correct. Dress it up however you like, but LLM and ML programs are probability gamblers all the way down. We’re building a conversation tool, that doesn’t truly comprehend the language because it’s a calculator at its core - it’s like asking your eyeballs to see in UHF frequencies.

        They’re called “computers” for a reason, and we are deep in the myopic tech tree of further and further complexity. The current wave of AI has solid potential, but not globally for all applications. It is a great at ‘digital assistant’ roles and is already killing it in CCTV monitoring software. Mindjourney can make incredible images, but it can’t make art. ChatGPT can write, but it’s a terrible author or speechwriter.

      • @coffeetest@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I agree with this. Its wildly misunderstood and it’s the name. AI is absolutely the most amazing marketing name for it but its only a thin veneer of our sci fi dreams. Over time that veneer might get a bit thicker but it wont be what people think it will be. It is good at certain things, like you know, being a large language model, but it is a (very) limited subset of what human intelligence is.

        • Kichae
          link
          fedilink
          English
          910 months ago

          It’s not “widely misunderstood”, it’s been widely hyped by the people actively selling it. The tech bros are pumping and dumping it, just like with every other tech panacea.

          It’s not the public, it’s the snake oil salesmen.

          • @coffeetest@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            310 months ago

            That’s what I am saying. The buyers wildly misunderstand it. The seller presents it with a very effective and misleading pitch.

            Look at the Intuit CEO who just fired 10% of their labor to pivot to AI to um, “give financial advise.” And then goes on to say any other company who doesn’t do the same will fall behind and fail. Time will tell but I am going to go with, people will laugh when Intuit is on fire.

            • @anachronist@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              110 months ago

              I suspect Intuit fired those workers for other reasons (free file) and are using AI as an excuse because to admit that free-file is an existential threat to their business is to admit that their company has no long term business prospects.

              • @coffeetest@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                110 months ago

                That seems entirely plausible for the staffing change. But Intuit is more than their tax software for example Quickbooks isn’t going anywhere. I am sure they do other stuff, probably payment processing and I don’t know what else. So they will survive at some level, it would be hard to kill Quickbooks.

    • Todd Bonzalez
      link
      fedilink
      1210 months ago

      Not really comparable.

      AI has lots of potential for the future, and Goldman Sachs continues to invest in that sector.

      They are specifically talking about the bubble of Generative AI startups, none of which have any long term viability as they either produce a novelty, or they produce something so inaccurate that nobody would trust it after using it.

      They aren’t the people saying that the Internet won’t catch on. They’re the ones warning you that dot com is a bubble.

      They’re right.

        • @Kissaki@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          810 months ago

          Holy mother of misinterpretation and misrepresentation. Did you not read their comment, did you not understand their comment, or did you choose to ignore and misrepresent it?

          • Todd Bonzalez
            link
            fedilink
            510 months ago

            They deliberately misrepresented it. Just another person who thinks that if you oppose Goldman Sachs for their contributions to late stage capitalism that you are obligated to disagree with every single piece of messaging from them without exception.

            If the CEO of Goldman Sachs shits in a toilet, and this guy finds out, he’s going to shit on the floor in protest.

    • @LukeZaz@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      410 months ago

      I find comments like these on places like Beehaw almost amusing in a way. It’s like watching a drunk person stumble from a bar all the way to a courthouse and getting upset the clerk won’t sell them more liquor.

      Seriously though, I’m not sure what you hope to accomplish here. Just about everybody here disagrees and isn’t keen on a take like this, and I’d figure you’d have been able to tell as much before posting. So… are you just here to argue?