I think it’s pretty safe to say that the majority of us are here to avoid another corporate takeover of our preferred platforms. It would seem to me to be a tad irresponsible to allow Facebook into our space with open arms, allowing them to hoover up our data. I would love to keep using Lemmy.world, but will happily change instances if need be, and I feel many share that sentiment.

  • Ghostalmedia
    link
    fedilink
    English
    166
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Well, right now Meta is pushing, not pulling. Meaning, Threads content can be displayed on Masto, but not the other way around.

    IMHO, the bigger threat is having Threads content completely dominate other activity pub clients. Other clients / communities could get dependent on it. Then Meta is basically a drug dealer with leverage.

    Data collection doesn’t bother me too much. I’m not going to install their client and all of the behavior trackers that come with it, and my activity pub content is already freely available to query on the internet. If they want it, they already have access to it. Everyone does.

    • @webjukebox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      201 year ago

      Data collection doesn’t bother me too much. I’m not going to install their client and all of the behavior trackers that come with it, and my activity pub content is already freely available to query on the internet. If they want it, they already have access to it. Everyone does.

      I will be able to follow and see friends’ posts and sports teams’ posts through Mastodon without needing a Meta account nor install their shitty apps.

      All I posted via fediverse is public already, traveling into some obscure instances, so I don’t care if Meta uses or shares my public posts.

    • @AustralianSimon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      161 year ago

      This, the real threat is the amount of content that federates out possibly hurting others servers’ performance as their enterprise kit will scale better.

      • Ghostalmedia
        link
        fedilink
        English
        401 year ago

        Correct. This is an issue for Masto, not Lemmy. It may never be an issue for Lemmy for all we know. Lemmy is focused on following activity pub communities not individual people.

      • @infinitepcg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        Interesting. It seems that Lemmy can see Mastodon users and send private messages to them. And I believe Mastodon users can create Lemmy posts, so potentially Threads users could do that too once Meta enables two-way communication.

        • @Microw@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          It all depends on how the Meta teams implements ActivityPub and which parts of it.

    • @Rognaut@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      81 year ago

      I like your perspective. More people need to realize that they are responsible for what they put out there.

      • PropaGandalf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -9
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        God why are all crying about XMPP? If you want to make it more popular just start using it yourself. If you don’t have anyone to speak with over there just speak with me (seriously DM me).

        Also we have a lot of open source alternatives by now so XMPP is just one of many good options which means that the people will go whith what they feel comfortable with. Trust me, if XMPP would be the only decentralized, open source chat protocol around I’d be using it exclusively and many others would probably too.

      • @MostlyHarmless@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        This article is so misleading. XMPP died for the same reason all technology dies. No one used it. Even if Google hadn’t ever used it, it would still be dead. I know this because Google Talk and ALL Google chat apps are dead. WhatsApp killed them all.

        • @Eldritch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          You are more correct than they are but are still wrong*. A lot of the interest in XMPP died after they started pursuing standardization and of course after Google close off their servers. It never had a ground swell before or after that either though. XMPP however, still exists to this day. And has become integrated into internet of things, protocols for communications between devices and as well as more comprehensive communication services such as SIP. They literally just had their 2023 Google summer of code complete a month or so ago?

          But yeah XMPP is not dead. Unfortunately, it was a surpassed by a number of other services that offered more. Evolving faster than XMPP could while looking to become standardized. It only lost relevance to most. Not it’s life. For what it’s worth since 2000 or 2001, there’s hardly been a day that I have not been logged in to an XMPP server. I’m logged into one right now.

    • Tiger Jerusalem
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      Threads content completely dominate other activity pub clients. Other clients / communities could get dependent on it. Then Meta is basically a drug dealer with leverage.

      How? Because this doesn’t make an yota of sense to me.

      Flipboard federated. Are you flooded with news from them?

    • kim (she/her)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 year ago

      even if they are only “pushing”, there will still need to be profile data exchanged with Threads in order to access it, if they have http signatures enabled (i.e. authorized fetch under mastodon)