• aberrate_junior_beatnik (he/him)@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    134
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Imagine using something dangerous to generate power or heat for a home. Something that if it leaks into your home could suffocate you overnight or explode, or that in normal use can give children respiratory issues or cause cancer. Thank goodness we’re too smart to use something like that unlike the absolute imbeciles in this comic

    • dmention7@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yes, the kilo-wat. For when a simple “wat” doesn’t accurately capture the absurdity of the situation.

      For example, asking junior to put an atomic wafer in the power box, when you are standing right fucking next to it.

  • mactrl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    tell me you dont understand how nuclear-powered energy without telling me you dont understand nuclear-powered energy

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Could you imagine a world where we first used atomic power for good and not evil?

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not really. It’s not economical and never has been. Civilian use of nuclear energy has only ever been a cover for nuclear arms development.

  • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    So was the popular conception back then that power was somehow magically transferred directly from uranium to the power grid?

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      What grid? It looks like the “power box” on the wall is generating power for that house all by itself, no transmission necessary.

      Considering that the smallest operating nuclear reactor ever made was this big…

      SNAP-10A nuclear reactor

      …and that critical mass is a thing, I can only assume the “power box” was some kind of RTG.

      • Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Wouldn’t all but the largest RTGs struggle to power more than a few incandescent light bulbs, though? Looking at the table on Wikipedia, their output is usually only from a few dozen to a few hundred watts.

        • vane@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          It was 60 years ago. If they put same effort to it as they put to computers you would have one in your pocket.

          • jj4211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            RTGs aren’t as limited by technological investment as they are constrained by fundamental physics.

          • LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            It is pretty hard to irradiate a whole block and give everyone turbo-cancer with my smartphone, tbh.

            The Soviets used RTGs quite a bit for remote installations, and “whoops, we lost one, I hope nobody finds it and kills their family” is a real concern (that was kind of ignored because a. Russia is big and b. it’s the Soviets we are talking about)

    • Alex@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It was worse than that. Our understanding of radiation took awhile. While Uranium glass is probably safe I wouldn’t go using it regularly. A lot of women (“radium girls”) suffered from cancers induced by licking their brushes when painting luminescing instruments. This comic looks like 50s era when post the bomb sci-fi was full of “atomics” as the stuff of the future.

  • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t think fiscal cost is the best or only way to measure success or necessarily improvement of society’s energy generation.

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    $ 0.001

    The Jetsons/strangelove era pricing for nuclear energy was based on fuel costs only, and certainly scale was needed rather than this absurd wafer system. The fuel costs were based on no one using any yet, and maybe children yearning for the cancer.