Apparently this will include Linux…

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      3 months ago

      Easy enough to send threatening cease and desist letters to distro maintainers that may not have a penny in savings. This is a huge gift to Apple and Microsoft that probably had enough of Linux hoarding in on their market share.

  • Eiri@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Linux distributions should react by asking users to confirm they’re not in California. They’ll backpedal fast.

  • somethingDotExe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    3 months ago

    All this age verification crap. Where is the fucking parents? I get that big tech has some responsability in all this. But how about we just make the responsible choice, of not letting a 8 year old near tiktok forinstance? Oh, it is just another excuse for private survailance you say? I see, I see…

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m a parent and legit think that majority of parents should not have been parents and have no minimum required skill to raise a human being. It’s sad because it’s really not that hard but most people don’t think a day ahead when raising their kids and just follow a “vibe”, so spending a weekend on parental controls is an insurmountable task.

        • somethingDotExe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          I AM a parent. And I will take the fight. Even though all other parrents will call me the “tin foil hat” rather that, than letting my child become a predators next meal online… These parrents has no idea what social media is all about. It’s a fucking addiction. The children can’t see this, this is why it’s our job to protect them.

    • Joelk111@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      As usual, the solution is education. Parental education needs to be prioritized imo. That said, I have no idea how we would implement such a thing. Most likely better general education would help at least.

    • Archr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Just want to clarify that nowhere in the actual law does it require verifying the age of the user. It does not require IDs or face scans.

      https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=202520260AB1043

      Please read it. It is a very short law <15 minute read tbh.

      The law does exactly what you ask for. Parents setup the device and put their child’s age. If they lie or circumvent the system then the parents get fined if their child is affected by content on the internet.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      As a Californian parent, I’m teaching my kids to use Linux to be safer against surveillance and control. It is 100% my responsibility because I chose to have children and let them use computers. It’s a dangerous world out there.

      IDs in databases get leaked.

    • spacetff@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Too bad that reproductive harm doesn’t work eliminating the birth of politicians

  • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 months ago

    “Lets fight ICE” also “you need an id to use your laptop and be verifed by big tech to use it” Worse then clowns. Fucking traitors

  • TiredTiger@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    3 months ago

    And are they going to require ID to verify birth dates, or is this just going to be a drop down menu? If the latter, I’m pretty sure everyone’s birth date is 1/1/1901. I’m so tired of this surveillance shit masquerading as “save the children” nonsense. I hate to say it, but this is a parenting problem and if your kids are more tech-savvy than you are, they WILL find a way around these safegaurds.

  • criss_cross@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 months ago

    In essence, while the bill doesn’t seem to require the most egregious forms of age verification (face scans or similar), it does require OS providers to collect age verification of some form at the account/user creation stage—and to be able to pass a segmented version of that information to outside developers upon request.

    So you just fake a date and call it a day… thank you Cali…

    For real though I can’t imagine the sysadmin and docker nightmares that arise from having to completely overhaul your account orchestration scripts to input a garbage birthday.

    I don’t think anyone thought of the fact that an account on an OS doesn’t always correspond to a human.

    • Archr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      The law only specifies “computer, mobile device, or any other general purpose computing device.”

      Which is extremely vague. It appears that the intention was to just affect end user devices. Not specific purpose systems.

  • Peasley@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 months ago

    This is being pushed by social media companies that don’t want to be responsible for age verification

  • Macaroni_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    3 months ago

    Please explain to a complete doofus how can someone enforce this?

    Cant they just download any linux distro from millions of different places and install them on any machine, even offline?

    • maplesaga@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Bios are becoming more and more locked down, that’ll be the next thing, at the tech lobbyists behest.

    • Archr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      The law only penalizes instances that affect children. So by circumventing this law does not mean you would be charged with any fines. But if you circumvent it and your child uses the device then you would be liable no more than 7500$ (since in this case it would be an intentional violation).

      I am not a lawyer. This is just what I understand the law to penalize.

      OS providers and developers are also not liable if you set an incorrect age for your child intentionally or by mistake, only you would be.

      But if they flaunt this law (do not try to comply with best effort) then they would be liable for each affected child.

      Edit: sorry this didn’t exactly answer your question. How they enforce it would be that it is tacked onto other charges from what I understand.

      Edit 2: oh and children can’t be charged, only adults (18+).

  • kittenroar@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 months ago

    Fucking stupid. What now, everyone adds a script to enter 04/01/1984 for every continuous integration pipeline? Every kubernetes cluster has to include an age automation? Idiot politicians should not draft policies about shit they have no clue about.

    • spacetff@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Politician: The lowest form of life on earth (lower than slime mold… sorry for insulting slime mold).

      They produce nothing of value, never have and never will, true sociopaths, total liars, elitest narsacistc parasites and oxygen wasters and generally evil…

      • kittenroar@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s because they are controlled by capitalists. Capitalists have shown the whole world what they stand for these past 4 years.