• Karjalan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        I remember studying this (the illness, not the show) in psychology. Something like wernickes aphasisa? Or maybe brochas aphasisa?

        Your brain fails to process like the left half of what it’s seeing, so they draw clocks only showing the left half with so the numbers there.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      I wonder if the issue is that AIs just have no idea how to draw a clock. Or, is it that they’ve been trained on papers where doctors talk about the various issues patients sometimes have when drawing clocks.

      I suspect it’s probably the first one. AIs seem to have a real problem with anything visually complicated. One of the easiest ways to spot AI slop is to look at the logos on t-shirts.

      • EldritchFemininity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        AI run on statistical probability. The more options there are in something, the harder it is to get right. A clock face becomes hard because practically the entire clock changes from moment to moment, and logos on shirts are similar in that they’re largely all in the same place but vary dramatically in shape to be as distinct from each other as possible, which is basically the exact opposite of what an AI wants. When your whole thing is basically averaging stuff out on a probability curve that’s weighted towards specific keywords, having massive variation in your data points is bad.

        • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah and some clocks have a second hand and some don’t sometimes clocks use roman numerals sometimes they’re arabic numerals, and that’s if it can understand based on context if someone saying just “clock” in the data the scraped is referring to a digital clock or an analog clock.

          In general LLMs don’t understand logic, though I suspect they have given some of them ability to run some code validation logic (that’s not actually AI) when you tell it to generate code in some languages. I say this because I’ve had it produce some code that could compile, but it seemingly put some example code into a function and had some other example code that needed to call that function with another parameter so it just created a third function that accepts the additional parameter and calls the first function (throwing away that parameter). It compiles but doesn’t have any understanding of how stupid that is on a logical level. So it seems like it’s just trying stuff until it’s capable of compiling without there being any understanding of how anything works.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      I was assuming they saw the post here a couple of days ago and screenshotted or got the idea from there

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    That might be a good thing for all the gen alphas who can’t read a clock. There are a lot of them.

    • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      When I see these generation-hating comments — specifically older generations hating on something the younger generations do — I can’t help but think about whose fault it is for whatever slight the older generation feels.

      Who created digital clocks? Who created iPads and iPhones? Who created video games? Every single generation has their own slang that each previous generation fails to understand (not because it doesn’t make sense, but because the previous generations are too lazy and/or stubborn to learn).

      /soapbox

    • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Plenty of people older than Gen Alpha very much prefer digital clocks too. I can read analog clocks but it takes me several seconds to convert it to digital time (which is how my brain thinks). As far as I’m concerned, analog clocks are a relic of the past and it’s a good thing to abolish as many of them as possible.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’ve never liked them. It’s a design that’s like “give me a rough approximation of the time” vs. a digital clock that gives you the precise time. And, if all you want is a rough approximation of the time, a digital clock is still probably better because you just read the first few digits.

  • not_woody_shaw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    What about showing birthdays? We need a birthday experience. We need to hire a birthday guy to build it fast.