A friend and I want to create a point to point connection across roughly 3.5 miles / 5.5 km. We have good LoS. Can HaLow do this? It seems like that distance might be a latt order, I think directional antennas might help, but would it be enough? What kind of equipment would we need?

  • @BakedCatboy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    35 hours ago

    Sounds like a job for a pair of second hand nanobeams or something similar.

    I second the other commenter who suggested using WISP gear. If you have clear fresnel zones it should work a treat.

  • @litchralee@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    66 hours ago

    For a link of 5.5 km and with clear LoS, I would reach for 802.11 WiFi, since the range of 802.11ah HaLow wouldn’t necessarily be needed. For reference, many WISPs use Ubiquiti 5 GHz point-to-point APs for their backhaul links for much further distances.

    The question would be what your RF link conditions look like, whether 5 GHz is clear in your environment, and what sort of worst-case bandwidth you can accept. With a clear Fresnel zone, you could probably be pushing something like 50 Mbps symmetrical, if properly aimed and configured.

    Ubiquiti’s website has a neat tool for roughly calculating terrain and RF losses.

    • Iced Raktajino
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15 hours ago

      I think the point of 11h is to achieve that kind of range without directional antennas. Basically as a higher-bandwidth version of LoRa.

      • @empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 hours ago

        And at significantly lower transmit power too. Ubiquiti 5ac ptp rigs use like 8w, 802.11ah can make a link with under a watt. Sure it won’t be fast at all but if you’re doing a remote embedded device on a solar panel, it makes a huge difference.