“Get back in the lab and make me a reproducible reaction.”
No one means Laplace the person if they say Laplace. And the same for Lagrange though that’s usually only Lagrange points and Laplace is mostly the distribution but also other stuff. Very little of mathematics is named for women because of misogyny. The only thing that comes to mind is Noether’s theorem and that’s not something you come across often. We have Pythagoras but not Hypathia. Einstein but not Maric. At least Lovelace is as famous as Babbage.
Dunno, Noetherian ring comes up every time commutative algebra is involved.
I love mathematicians and I love that this is what they came up for with regard to applications of ring theory:
The Lagrangian is not just a place in space.
lamarr, get out of there!
Where is Leibniz in this scheme of yours?
I was looking for L’hopital
TLC: Taylor, L’Hospital, and a constant
L’Hospital lol
Should’ve namedropped Lovelace.
That be L’Huillier, Lan Wu, Ladyzhenskaya
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sau_Lan_Wu
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anne_L'Huillier
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olga_Ladyzhenskaya
but my eyes might be misleading me
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_physicsNobody is meant to work, abolish work.
100% agree!
Always wondered if women were naturally not as good at math as men or if it’s a social construct. Easier to believe the social construct thing, but there are differences in how we think. Hell, there are differences in our very vision. But math? Dunno.
What’s the latest science on this? Anyone? (And yes, I too can find articles supporting any view I choose. Got any solid science?)
Solving complicated physical equations, sounds like fate worse than death
You can laPlace this dick
Time based or frequency based, that dick be little-ass
