• reddig33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      1980s. Brought to you by Reagan.

      “Fast-forward to the 1980s: while Ronald Reagan was telling Americans to “Just Say No,” the feds cozied up to the pharmaceutical industry, and relaxed their legal restrictions. Direct-to-consumer marketing (DTCM), what you probably know as “drug commercials,” was first given the seal of approval in the US in 1985.”

      https://www.thrillist.com/health/nation/why-are-prescription-drug-advertisements-legal-in-america

      • QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        1 year ago

        “Drug commercials as you know them really only began in 1997, when constraints were further loosened, and new meds began to feature in television commercials. For its part, the FDA notes that no federal law has ever outlawed drug ads, justifying its progressively lax regulation.”

        The next paragraph explains why I mention the 1990sbecause before then you would have to have printed on screen the side effects.

    • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not to mention the people who come up with all that cheesy music and lyrics that try to rhyme with the nonsensical words the industry uses for drug names.

  • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    But then how will they try to defend exorbitant drug prices when they no longer have tens of millions of dollars of advertising expenditures and are still developing drugs largely via publicly funded research?

    • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Think of how insanely expensive those ads are: Besides the exorbitant cost of running them multiple times a day on numerous expensive broadcast channels during every day part, there’s the production costs.

      Big casts, big crew, location shooting, lots of costumes, etc. Then there is the music. They tend to use great classic rock songs, which carry extremely heavy royalty rates. In addition, they usually change the arrangement, and even write new lyrics. Changing the lyrics costs a FORTUNE.

      The costs for the ad before it even runs, is incredible. The marketing costs for the entire campaign must be enormous. No wonder prescription drug costs are so high.

  • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    There was a time when ads for both pharmaceuticals and lawyers were both illegal. Considering how many of each I see every day, it makes me wonder how they filled their ad schedules in the olden days.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      Laundry detergent and other household cleaners targeting stay-at-home wives.

      It’s why daytime dramas are called Soap Operas.

    • gramie@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have barely watched non-streaming TV for probably a decade or more, but I believe that in Canada it is much more difficult to advertise pharmaceuticals or law services. I think they can do it, but there are a lot of restrictions.

      Certainly when I’m subjected exposed to American TV, the number of pharmaceutical commercials is staggering.

      • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t know about lawyers, but as far as I know, the only two countries that allow pharmaceuticals advertising are the United States and New Zealand.

    • Pilferjinx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It fucking sucks that he is kneecapped by every other politician and is rendered mostly to just a voice.

      • BMW_stick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Disgusting isn’t it? I firmly believe that if Bernie had become president in 2016 and or 2020, Trump’s name would be nothing more than board game worthy. The Democratic party gave us trump.

  • RagnarokOnline@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fucking PUH-LEEZE! If I have to see another plaque psoriasis ad during my dinner time viewing of Love After Lockup, I’m gonna blow chunks

  • mkhopper@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    But what will be shown during the nightly national news programs??
    If they can’t run same 12 medical ads every, fucking, day, whatever will they do?

    If I never have to hear that idiotic Jardiance song again, I would be so happy.