Clarence Thomas wrote a scathing, nearly 50-page dissent about why the Supreme Court should have gutted voting rights
www.businessinsider.com
Thomas was one of four conservative justices who dissented in Thursday's 5-4 ruling that backed the Voting Rights Act.
  • zkikiz@lemmy.mlEnglish
    13·
    3 years ago

    And which, if applied retroactively, would have prevented him from being a judge in the first place, thus creating a time paradox