a classic
Looking at those all day is enough to break anyone.
“Prehistoric sex toys are kind of hard to look at - I keep getting thrown out of the museum after trying to get hands on experience with them”
I love it when adverts get placed next to dildos 🤣
Wtf is up with humanity’s primordial fascination with cut dicks?
“Totally retracred or cut” means either the foreskin is cut or that it’s just pulled back.
We don’t know if it’s cut or not, we can only speculate it looks like one.
deleted by creator
hehe, hard
There are many non-dildoish uses for which it may have been intended but without doubt anyone at the time would have seen the penile similarities - Dr. Martin Rundkvist, archaeologist
Brilliant.
If you drew eyes on them, any of the lady image could become characters in a Ghibli movie.
Why are they circumsized? Surely it would have been less work to leave the stone foreskin uncut.
I suspect many of the uncut ones are less obvious and thus may have had their purpose misidentified. Also, it’s unclear if these are cut or merely retracted
Because our ancestors didn’t get up their own ass about buzzwords.
They got up their own ass about manhood rites instead.
If the tools on display in the article are anything to go by, there is a distinct possibility they just got up their own ass.
shouldn’t they have flared bases?
Well, none of them are still alive, that should be a hint
