Banana for size?
I mean, space also looks like this:
Point being: the statement “space looks like X” doesn’t make any sense because space looks like literally everything.
Most surfaces in space look like a quarry. So that’s fair. You could also include the ones that are on fire and the ones inside of some sort of toxic cloud.
But the exceptions are the most interesting parts. There’s a reason there’s not much entertainment out there about people stranded in deserts, mountains, and open oceans that feature not a single encounter with life.
I’ve played Star Citizen, roaming dead space and lifeless planets gets old fast.
Is most surface area on planets/asteroids, or on stars?
Walkable and filmable? It would be the rocky ones.
I mean, space doesn’t look like anything.
Also true. Even truer, in fact. Still validates classic Dr. Who having trash production design.
Then what are the lines on on my graph for huh!? Dummy
I like your point, but to be pedantic, I think in this context “space” is short for outer space.
Tecnically, this photo is taken in space.
All photos are
Shit I take photos better than this when I’m wasted. Stupid scientists
Blown out whites and shadows, out of focus, disgusting vignetting, and lens flares on lens flares. Smh why even try, this is a horrible pfp. Not going to get any matches.
Sounds like freshman year of art school!
Look, in their defence, they’re wasted too
If I’d managed to stick a robot landing on a rock hurtling through space, you bet I’d be celebrating hard too
JJ Abrams aimed the camera.
Didn’t even use the cat ear filter. Amateurs…
The Rock Yard at NASA Houston was used for for testing out the Mars rover - lots of volcanic rocks to model Mars. Looked really fucking cool to see a couple of interns drive around on a “fake” Mars.
Rock and stone.
FOR CARL!
And real quantum computers look like overdone sci fi props.
deleted by creator
