fossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 10 months agothe duality of beetlelemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square53linkfedilinkarrow-up1606arrow-down16
arrow-up1600arrow-down1imagethe duality of beetlelemmy.dbzer0.comfossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square53linkfedilink
minus-squarego $fsck yourself@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up52arrow-down3·edit-210 months agoHere’s a super rare, cool, and interesting beetle! *posts a super low quality image* Here you go, since OP doesn’t care about quality.
minus-squareFundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up28arrow-down2·10 months agoAppreciate your images. But I don’t think that shade on OP was necessary lol.
minus-squarePsythik@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·10 months agoThe shade absolutely was necessary. This isn’t reddit; have some standards.
minus-squaremexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·10 months agoThe one tagged “female” was just a bottom view and they both look similiar? Is that the joke?
minus-squareJustAnotherKay@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·10 months agoNo there’s no joke. It’s the same beetle, top and bottom. Split down the middle to be genetically male and female
minus-squaremexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·10 months agoOhh ohh damn lol. Posting two pictures was extremely confusing given “left” and “right”
minus-squarePsythik@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·10 months agoTo be fair, your images are full of jpeg artifacts. But at least they’re higher res.
minus-squarego $fsck yourself@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·10 months agoThat’s why I didn’t say anything about jpeg artifacts. Just low quality.
minus-squareraldone01@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·10 months agoReminds me of something I drew a while back. I screwed up the equal length of the mandibles from the reference image. They look very similar to this bettle though. The body texture and shape is not quite right though.
Here’s a super rare, cool, and interesting beetle!
*posts a super low quality image*
Here you go, since OP doesn’t care about quality.
Appreciate your images. But I don’t think that shade on OP was necessary lol.
The shade absolutely was necessary. This isn’t reddit; have some standards.
The one tagged “female” was just a bottom view and they both look similiar? Is that the joke?
No there’s no joke. It’s the same beetle, top and bottom. Split down the middle to be genetically male and female
Ohh ohh damn lol. Posting two pictures was extremely confusing given “left” and “right”
To be fair, your images are full of jpeg artifacts. But at least they’re higher res.
That’s why I didn’t say anything about jpeg artifacts. Just low quality.
Reminds me of something I drew a while back.
I screwed up the equal length of the mandibles from the reference image. They look very similar to this bettle though. The body texture and shape is not quite right though.