• RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s almost impossible to see the last two words because your brain is already reeling from the rest of the statement. It took me a few tries to finally parse it.

    • qarbone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      I very slowly zoomed in on the actual words in the post.

      Started off processing “molecule” as “mole”, “solar system” as “galaxy”, and thinking “ha, don’t know if that’s true but it sounds both plausible and neat”.

      • TootSweet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 year ago

        There are definitely more hydrogen atoms in a mole of water than stars in the Milky Way.

        The Milky Way has somewhere between 100 and 400 billion stars according to Wikipedia (1*10^11 to 4*10^11). A mole of water has 6.022*10^23 molecules in it, each of which has two hydrogen atoms in it for a total of 1.2044*10^24 hydrogen atoms.

        10^24 / 10^11 = 10^13 which is ten trillion. So, a mole of water has roughly ten trillion times as many hydrogen atoms as the Milky Way has stars.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wasn’t thinking moles, not that technical, but it sounded plausible vs. the number of stars in the Milky Way.

        Wait…

    • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      The glass of water is a bit misleading. Your brain starts thinking about all the water molecules inside. That’s all.

    • noobface@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s actually just the first part of the phrase. The whole thing is “je ne suis pas français, chappeau”

      edit: Ok this was supposed to be a joke about mansplaining something you know nothing about, but we fell into Poe’s law.

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        just the first part of the phrase

        Seems to me like it was the last part of the phrase.

      • Vespair@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        je ne suis pas français, chappeau

        I tried googling this to see if I was missing some reference or something and it led to strange google behavior I’ve never seen before… When I search “je ne suis pas français, chappeau” without the quotation marks, Google automatically changes the French to English in the search bar when I hit the search button.

        Anyone else experienced this? For what possible fucking purpose would that exist?

      • mavu@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Huh, this is an interesting intercultural communiaction trap.

        In my area, this is just used as a shorthand/slang/idiom for “nice, i respect that” or in place of a nod or “thank you”

        Edit: i should add, that as far as i know, a chappeau is a type of cap or hat? Right? have to google that.

        edit2: yes, a hat. The origin of the use I know for it is probably a salute where you touch your finger or hand to the hat, or lifting the hat.
        Here saying “hat” seems to be enough :D

  • TheImpressiveX@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago
    Click here if you don't understand

    There is only one star in our solar system - the Sun.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    There are more memes estimating the size of the universe than there are stars in the galaxy.

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    I skipped reading the word stars, and I thought it was deliberately wrong to rile people up.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago
    • Number of hydrogen atoms in a single molecule of water (H2O): 2
    • Number of stars in our (ENTIRE) solar system: 1

    That’s the joke.

  • Subverb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    There actually are more molocules of H2O in 10 drops of water than there are stars in the observable universe.

    • Hammocks4All@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Optimists: the glass is half full

      Pessimists: this half empty glass of water has more molecules than there are stars in the observable universe; life is meaningless

  • don@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    There are fewer hydrogen atoms in a single molecule of water than there are fingers on my hand.

    Check and mate.

  • Hyphlosion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Reminds me of the time someone on Xitter said that there are more trees on Earth than there are stars in our Galaxy. They got ratio’d pretty damn hard for it. -_-

  • mspencer712@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I couldn’t find the clip, but first thing that came to mind was the StarTalk Live with Buzz Aldrin and John Hodgman.

    Hodgman: “maybe they’ll find H 2 2 2 2 O!”

    Edit: crap, I have to call myself out. I failed to read completely, thought the screenshotted poster accidentally changed one part of the comparison, instead of deliberately changing both parts. If the original was molecules in a cubic inch of water vs stars in the observable universe, I read this post as atoms in a molecule vs stars in the observable universe.

    Apologies, I discovered I was a fool and was excited to share my discovery.

    • RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      No need to feel foolish. You have introduced me to yet another John Hodgman project. And that’s all that matters in this world.