• son_named_bort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, coyotes can’t catch roadrunners despite having access to unlimited Acme products. They’re no match for humans.

    • Piemanding@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sucks that the movie that was finished about the coyote fighting Acme in court for all their failing products got scrapped for tax purposes.

      • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Please quit with this tax write off misinformation.

        They cut their losses. We don’t know the details why, but for some reason they decided it would cost too much in money or reputation to continue with marketing and release.

        Not everything is a billionaire conspiracy. Sometimes they just realise they made a film too shit to release, or some person in a suit just wanted to spite someone.

        • Piemanding@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Never said it was a write off. The video I watched on it did say that someone who worked on the film said it was for tax reasons. It’s a single source that might be incorrect, though.

          Edit: Here’s the video I watched on it. Says right on the title that it was for tax purposes and I don’t think an attorney would get that part incorrect.

          • booly@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            There’s no legitimate reason to intentionally take losses (or refuse to take revenue) for tax reasons, though.

            If you lose $1000 and get a tax benefit worth $200 on those losses, it’s still a net loss of $800, so you should rather get at least some money back. Getting $500 back might mean that you lose $500 and then get $100 back in tax benefits, so that your net loss is $400 instead. That’s an improvement over losing $800, so it’s worth doing.

            More likely, the contracts around the movie had them needing to pay rightsholders, actors/writers/directors, and producers based on certain formulas on the gross revenue, or would be contractually obligated to spend a minimum on marketing and promotion if there was going to be a release, etc.

            Taxes just alleviate the degree of losses (or reduce the amount of profit), which can change behavior around risk taking, but it wouldn’t make sense to abandon a finished movie solely for tax reasons.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Important to note here that you should not stand on an open field (being the highest point) or below a tree (high point that might drop wood) during a thunderstorm.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    No one shakes a vending machine. Its part of gen-x schooling to learn you rock the machine back just a bit and then let it settle back on its feet.

    What are they teaching kids now, if not that?

  • rothaine@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Most car accidents happen within a mile from home

    …because that’s where you’re driving most often

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      a depressing amount of people in the US have literally just driven over children while backing out from the garage, because the cars are so big they can’t see the kids

  • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Cow’s outnumber people on my block. But there are fences between them and us. However geese outnumber people in my yard.
    I have added goose wrestling to my resume.

  • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Getting an error message and a tiny thumbnail.

    edit =finally appeared. My life’s dreams are fulfilled and joy reigns in the land.

  • limelight79@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well there was that one time the vending machine decided to attack, but in general, it’s a human causing it to fall over.

  • marcos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    If vending machines ejected their beverage as vigorously as coconut trees, people wouldn’t put them on the same category on those statistics.

  • cliffracerflyyy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s hard to put into words how stupid that original take about coyotes in a corral even dares to be.

    • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah that’d be other animals, if you just count large mammals then yeh humans probably beat out everything else combined but predators of rodents, small sea creatures and insects almost certainly outdo us by orders of magnitude.