Hi everyone,

I’ve started pushing backups of media important to me (family pictures, video etc) to backblaze with client-side encryption.

However, are they a reliable storage provider? I can’t help but compare them to something like Amazon who likely has a better chance of maintaining my files but they are so expensive that I don’t even bother.

What do you think? Yes, I’ve heard of 3-2-1, however for now I only have backblaze and a local backup. I’m trying not to spend too much on this.

Thanks!

  • @Kcg@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    89 months ago

    I use them as my backup backup provider. Crazy cheap, my bill was like $1.50 for a month. Their backup command line tool is pretty solid also. I would definitely use them if you need a new backup provider.

  • 𝔻𝕒𝕧𝕖
    link
    fedilink
    English
    199 months ago

    I am a happy backblaze user and generally I’ve only heard good things about them.

    They do have multiple data centers and they are operating B2B products too.

    Is there anything in particular that would make you think they could be unreliable?

    • @Findmysec@infosec.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -19 months ago

      I’m just afraid of data loss, but I also know that that is unlikely. I have a local backup but sometimes I feel like that’s not enough, unfortunately my budget is also tight which means I can’t spend too much on replicated buckets/another cloud provider with a complete backup etc.

      Also, have you ever faced the issue where you’re pushing files to backblaze with rclone and there are many failed uploads (rclone retries them eventually after reaching the end of the queue), which is something I’ve never had with S3. Well, you get what you pay for I suppose.

  • @breakingcups@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    69 months ago

    It’s alright. I use both their desktop backup service and B2 extensively. Their desktop client and web interface is very basic and a bit rough, you don’t buy their service for the well-developed UI. The service works as advertised though.

  • conrad82
    link
    fedilink
    English
    39 months ago

    I have used them since januar 2019, and I don’t have any complaints. I have only needed to restore backups once - it worked as well as could be expected.

    Any issues with backups have always been on my side

    • @Findmysec@infosec.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      29 months ago

      Can you explain the situation around you restoring a backup? Did backblaze lose your data?

      AFAIK AWS replicates your data across buckets for reliability in case their datacentre goes down, which (from what I understand) is the cost of a whole another bucket with B2. That’s my concern. I don’t think Backblaze is going out of business any time soon but I’m afraid of data loss (I do have one local backup but my budget is unfortunately a bit tight right now - I’m going to have to pick and choose important bits from all of the data and add a second backup I guess)

      • @waitmarks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        48 months ago

        AWS has multiple teirs of storage options in s3, some replicate and some dont. by default those that do replicate do so in multiple availability zones, but not across regions. unless you turn on cross-region replication (CRR) which is an additional charge.

        So, for example without CRR if your bucket is in us-east-1 and 1 availability zone goes down you can still access the data, but if all of us-east-1 is down, you cannot.

  • @sleepmode@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    38 months ago

    Used them since the company started but stopped this year due to the cost going up. Never had an issue.

  • @theit8514@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    49 months ago

    I’ve got my mom setup on their PC backup service, no complaints so far (on the Backblaze side that is, she still insists that she doesn’t need continuous backups even though I’ve had to restore multiple times for her).

    I switched my backups from Crashplan to B2 as it was significantly cheaper than going to AWS. B2 is more expensive than what I was paying for Crashplan Pro Unlimited (about 8x for the amount of data I have), but I have more peace of mind with it not relying on Crashplan’s terrible Java client.

    A reminder that the only good backup is a tested backup.

  • @Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    48 months ago

    Tbf I think a 2-2-1 is sufficient for home users.
    I would only recommend 3-2-1 to some that has a business behind themself.

  • @Mountain_Mike_420@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    38 months ago

    I don’t use them but I work for a dj that uses them to backup all their music and production music. This has been going on for over 10 years now and they are still using them. At one point I was over there while they were downloading a large batch of their files and the speed was fast enough to saturate his internet.