You must log in or # to comment.
Also
Pi = 4! = 4×3×2 = 24
The lines in this are askew and it’s mildly annoying
They’re there to askew why the logic doesn’t work.
Does this work with triangles too?
Not true. If you define the circumference in terms of pi, you can define the circumference exactly.
“Find” not “define”
Putting things in base 10 is also a definition. Digits aren’t special.
deleted by creator
That doesnt make a difference. You can find the exact circumference of a circle, you just cant express it in the decimal system as a number (thats why we have a symbol for it so you can still express the exact value)
Let’s say you got a circle with radius 1/π…
came here for this
Nasa uses 15 digits of pi for solar system travel. And 42 digits is enough to calculate the entire universe to atomic accuracy
And 65 digits is sufficient to calculate the circumference of the visible universe to within a Planck length.
I know enough digits of pi to calculate the circumference of the universe??
Not if your diameter is d/pi. Then your circumference is d, where d > 0.
Check mate atheists.
Check mate matheists.
Ftfy.
Technically you can’t measure anything accurately because there’s an infinite amount of numbers between 1 and 0. Whose to say it’s exactly 1? It could be off by an infinite amount of 0s and 1.
Achilles and the Tortoise paradox.
Joke’s on them, tears are too salty to provide hydration.
The circumference of a circle with a diameter of 1 cm is exactly π cm. There you have it.
Besides measuring it with a measuring tape.
Ahem. MathEmaticians.
Pi is 3.
Ah, the Euler identity. 3^i ^3 -1=0
Rofl :D Well, close enough, and about as sexy when a bit drunk.
Prove it.
And you can’t trust anything calculated with an imaginary number. Common guys, it’s right there. It’s imaginary like the, totally not AI, person I’m pretending to be.
