This number goes for any substance

There are 20 billion calories in a gram of diet coke too

This is the solution to E=mc^2

If we are talking dietary calories uranium is close to 0

This is not accurate, only 93% has died so far!

hurr durr maybe it’s a vector in ℝ

What they actually see:

convolution
cross product
dot product
multiplication

ah, that makes sense!

US law is an interesting response to an ethics question

as does the same amount of any other substance, including for example yoghurt.

That number is just the E in E=mc²

If we are actually talking dietary calories, the number you see on foodstuff packaging, plutonium has 0.

I wouldn’t trust a guy letting their battery go that low either

still depends on if they’re the same pound, there are a few to chose from

Don’t cut out the artists signature

“don’t build the torment nexus”

Asimov himself wrote a book on how those laws don’t work.

ohh, tanks!

Am I missing a joke?

I want a refund of my lost minute!

Also intelligence isn’t some all encompassing thing. Just because you are a good learner or have superb spatial thinking or whatever else doesn’t mean you are good at planning for shit.

The classic view of intelligence completely misses how different people are, and how many different things intelligence could actually mean.

we use language in different contexts. In the food store “fruit” has one meaning, while in a botany paper, it has another.

This doesn’t say theres no such thing as fish generally, it says there is no useful definition for it in a biological setting.

2000s: Actually, fish aren’t fish

https://www.sciencealert.com/actually-there-is-no-such-thing-as-a-fish-say-cladists

still is

/i3gang

skill issue