• sadeiko@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    262
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Best interaction with an antimasker:

    Them: masks don’t work

    Me: We’ll I’m going to wear one anyway

    Them: Well then you’re just traping the germs against your face

    Me: so you’re saying they block germs?

    • kamenlady@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      137
      ·
      2 years ago

      They even stated the correct reason to wear a mask: to trap the germs against my face, so others don’t get infected

      It’s like they don’t compute the idea behind it, it stops at me me me

      • Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        61
        ·
        2 years ago

        My favorite reply to them is that it’s America and I can do whatever I want, I’ll call them snowflakes too whenever appropriate. They get pissed when you insinuate they’re anti American lul.

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          2 years ago

          i’ve just recently seen the same with pro 2a people. It was on a video about inclusive gun safety training, because the 2a is quite literally, for everyone. SO many people in the comments were saying something along the lines of “well if we trained them, then they might kill us”

          Yeah no shit. What do you think they thought of you prior to this moment huh? Just utter fucking ignorance for anything more than a mere shred of intellectual thought being put into whatever they say. Not to mention that this is borderline authoritarian policy by nature but that’s the other funny part.

          • slingstone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            2 years ago

            Didn’t gun control ramp up when the Black Panthers started exercising their rights to bear arms? Funny thing is the Panthers seem much more like a “well-regulated militia” than this Wild West, permitless carry, anything goes BS.

            • problematicPanther@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              2 years ago

              exactly. gun control only started when minorities started exercising their right to bear arms. The right don’t want gun control laws until the groups they are trying to oppress start exercising their second amendment rights.

            • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              2 years ago

              i mean, that’s also perfectly legal under 2A, 90% of the time gun control is related to regulation in regards to owning, rather than the ability to the own it period. Which is another argument all together tbh.

              I wouldnt know much about the specifics of that group though, only that it has to do with civil rights from memory lol.

      • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 years ago

        Claims are not evaluated, in the loyalist worldview. They’re not arguments. They’re slogans. You shuffle your cards and say whatever might justify the ingroup being fundamentally superior to the outgroup. Because of course, it is impossible for someone to simply be wrong. That would require evaluating claims. No: truth is dictated by people above you. They must be right and smart and handsome, or they wouldn’t be above you. Any challenge, any criticism, any disagreement, is a personal attack. You are calling someone lesser.

        And I say “you” because these people think this is all we’re doing. They think that’s all there is. It’s reality as a team sport.

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        Or, more likely, they’re selfish jerks who don’t care about anyone else. “The greater good? What’s that?”

      • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 years ago

        Their actual position is that they don’t give a fuck about anyone other than themself. Everything they claim to believe is just a rationalization they think will sound good to someone else. All they care about is what they can convince others.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      My favorite interactions was going into Walmart.

      It was mid/early spring, right as things were starting to lockdown. I wasn’t wearing a jacket cuz it was glorious out.

      Some old boomer lady started harassing me over not wearing a jacket and blah blah blah.

      She wouldn’t shut up, and was blocking me from walking in, so I faked a sneeze. The look of horror on her face as she fled.

      (And I’m pretty sure that was also the fastest time in and out of a Walmart…)

  • MeaanBeaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    You’re assuming these people believe we even send things to space. I had a serious ass conversation recently with my father’s roommate. Typical conspiracy theorist ding dong. Full on flat earther and everything. I asked him how he thinks GPS works if the earth was flat. He admitted he didn’t know but then when I started to explain how it works by pinging satellites we put up in space he cut me off and said space isn’t real. Like legitimately thinks space isn’t real. He on a separate occasion also complained that we didn’t need to wear masks during covid because we apparently make our own viruses in our bodies and viruses don’t spread between people.

    These people don’t even understand how logic works. Let alone that people could be smarter than they are.

    • fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 years ago

      Well, if you reject all knowledge you cannot obtain through direct observation, you can kinda start to understand how they ended up where they are.

      They’re intimidated by the scientific method.

      • flerp@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Many of them are religious and believe plenty of things they didn’t directly observe. It’s more that they have been trained through religious thinking that if someone confidently claims something it must be more true than someone who honestly admits that “it is the best we can know right now and we will update our understanding as we obtain more evidence.” These people need the answer now and that answer can’t change because changing your opinion based on new evidence is seen as weakness and opinions should be handed down from on high and never change.

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      2 years ago

      Tbh, it’s really your fault for choosing to interact with this person more than once.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        yeah, god forbid you try to break down the echo chamber existing between parties for the benefit of public good.

        Fuck you, be a good robot for the party and STICK ONLY WITH THE PEOPLE I DEMAND YOU TO STAY WITH.

    • paholg@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      2 years ago

      Unfortunately, the answer to that doesn’t lie in science but in politics.

      • BoxerDevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 years ago

        But I took a course in college Called political Science. So what about that mister science man?

    • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Ask the military industrial complex. Too much good applicable science and tech comes from space exploration.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Not really.

        The NASA budget has been slashed for decades on a row and is currently a tiny amount compared to what it was before. That they still manage to do what they do is half a miracle in on itself.

        It’s so bad that a 3 percent of the military budget given to NASA would double it’s budget instantly.

        With that in mind, I would put this on the military industrial complex

        • AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          The funny thing is that NASA contracts the same companies as the military anyways (in the modern day, at least)

          NASA Prime Contractors Aerojet Rocketdyne, Boeing, Jacobs, Lockheed Martin, and Northrop Grumman currently have over 3,800 suppliers contributing to Orion, the SLS rocket, and the lunar spaceport at Kennedy.

          It gets slightly less funny when you realize that that’s the reason Nasa’s latest rocket made primarily from Space Shuttle parts is way more expensive than basically any commercial rocket. Essentially Congress only agrees to fund NASA if it means they also get to fund these military contractors.

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      2 years ago

      Socializing your health care might destroy you guys, since there’s so many fatties, smokers, guns and people who ignore doctors. Sounds expensive.

      • flerp@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 years ago

        Except that it is a proven fact that public health care costs less per capita than private, so actually it sounds less expensive. The people lobbying to keep it private are the only ones who stand to lose and their brainwashed army of sycophants can’t understand anything beyond the points they’ve been trained to parrot.

        • FlihpFlorp@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          So I would love public healthcare but what’s the reason that public is cheaper

          This came off snarkier than I intended I’m just curious

          • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            what’s the reason that public is cheaper

            The number of middlemen is removed and their profit motive is removed from the equation.

          • Doof@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Plenty of information out there, they shouldn’t need to take the time to do that for you

      • nBodyProblem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        Smokers?! Have you ever been to France? It’s like a trip back in time to 80s America, with a smoker on every street corner and an ash tray on every cafe patio table.

  • OpenStars@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    But surely you must understand how someone, having failed all of their classes and then dropped out of school altogether, understands complex matters better than the people who are brilliant, have international acclaim, and devoted like 5 decades of their lives to study that same thing?

    Or you know, at least watched this 11-minute video?

    And if you do, can you explain it to me? :-P So far all I have is “Might Makes Right”, but somehow that seems to be lacking something…

    • wise_pancake@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      2 years ago

      They failed because they’re obviously smarter than science and not the other way around.

      • OpenStars@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        Also, are we not going to discuss the conspiracy theory that many of the people espousing this ideology were mysteriously killed!? And their families too! In fact, anyone even so much as near them had a chance to be affected, possibly some still here but with permanent brain damage!

        Sounds pretty sus if you ask me…

      • OpenStars@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 years ago

        Well, I was going to argue against that, but then I remembered that he is rich - which I guess is the same thing as smart? - so… okay! :-P

        img

          • OpenStars@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 years ago

            Yes this is very true. IQ is not the same as EQ, and neither are quite the same as “wisdom”. The latter comes from evaluated experiences - as in, if you fail to learn from your own mistakes then you will simply get dumber as you age, whereas if you seek out knowledge & learning & evaluate the mistakes of others, then the trajectory of your life will make you SMARTER as you age (up to a point ofc).

            Truthfully, the only way to spot a counterfeit is to know the real thing so extremely well that nobody can pull a fast one on you.

            Speaking of, don’t forget: GWB (the 2nd Bush president) only graduated Yale b/c his father donated a massive amount of $$$$ to the school - his grades (that he had sealed but at some point got leaked) reveal that he flunked out on his own merits. So even “educated” does not mean “educated” if you catch my drift.

            As far as a “guarantee” though… nothing is every truly guaranteed, so that might be asking too much. Still, it’s a good reminder to look at someone’s character - did someone get rich merely b/c of accidents, or b/c they truly deserved it. Though, do any of the recently rich truly deserve it? Bezos who won’t let workers pee (even pregnant mothers), Musk for taking a truly fantastic idea and turning into something that literally kills people, and Zuckerberg who… (shudder), just not even going to go there.

          • DrRatso@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            Getting a higher education is one thing, call me when he has published multiple peer-reviewed studies in any field and I just might take his opinions in said field to heart.

  • slingstone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    People act like their mamas never told 'em to cover their damned mouths when they cough or sneeze. It’s the same damned thing, only masks work much better at keeping your filthy germs from infecting other people.

    Common sense ain’t common, they say, and this anti-mask nonsense is just proof that it’s true.

    • NegativeInf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 years ago

      But don’t you know? Having symptoms like “drier mouth,” “fogged glasses,” and “smelling your own breath” are much more dangerous than a virus that killed a million Americans at least.

      What it really tells me it that the mouth breathers are crazier than we gave them credit for.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      People act like their mamas never told 'em to cover their damned mouths when they cough or sneeze

      Nor to wash their hands before eating (or even after going to the toilet.)

      • slingstone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 years ago

        I tried explaining universal precautions to a pastor of a church I was attending, and pointed out that there is a Christian commandment to love one’s neighbor that overrides one’s personal desires. He could not dispute my points, but he also didn’t do anything to implement safety procedures.

        Guess who left the church after the unsurprising COVID outbreak?

        I realize a lot of people here aren’t believers, but my point is that even within the context of religion or common wisdom, masks make sense.

        There’s been a lot of talk lately about how decades of lead in gasoline, pipes, and in other places likely damaged generations of people’s ability to reason. I’m sincerely beginning to think this is a bigger problem than we’ll ever truly know.

  • LoamImprovement@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 years ago

    I mean a lot of them also don’t believe we landed unmanned units on mars, or humans on the moon, for that matter, so…

  • fckreddit@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I am reasonably sure that a fair many conservatives feel that they are entitled to their biases and fallacies and the world must bend to these biases.

  • muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    Well it doesnt help that studies post covid restrictions found many of said restrictions where ineffective. Masks tho we have good evidance they work at least.

    • tastysnacks@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      2 years ago

      Masks are more effective in protecting others if you are sick, rather than protecting yourself if others are sick. We should have the attitude that protecting others is good.

      • rekabis@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        We should have the attitude that protecting others is good.

        This flies in the face of North American “exceptional/radical individualism”.

        Asian societies are largely collective. You do what you can to serve others, putting the needs of the community ahead of your own, and this leads to tighter-knit, stronger, and more resilient communities.

        North American society is based on “muh rights” individualism, where the person is most important, and society needs to serve their needs, and not the other way around. This leads to weak, ephemeral, almost non-existent communities that are there only in name, or by a fluke of geography that makes completely random people cluster together without ever making serious or deep social connections.

        Of the two, the former might end up being stifling to creatives and neuroatypicals, but the latter cannot survive any significant challenge without a significantly negative impact on the “community”.

    • Dr Cog@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      As always, it’s better to recommend more strict restrictions when you don’t know if they’re effective and there’s an impact on public health. Hindsight is 20/20

      • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I don’t know about other countries, but the on and off lockdowns in some countries proved to be ineffective. Many experts said it’s better to do lockdown in one go than it being staggered and having different levels of restrictions. But on the one hand, the totalitarian zero-COVID restriction like had happened in China is just as ineffictive.

        • Dr Cog@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          Yep, the lockdown waves probably weren’t ideal for preventing viral spread, but we now know they were at least better than doing nothing.

          Hopefully we learn for next time

  • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    Well you have to let the virus out if you want to get rid of it. Why do you think there’s that saying about having to pass a cold along?

  • Gigan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    2 years ago

    It probably didn’t help that at the beginning they said the cloth didn’t help, then changed the messaging later on.

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      IIRC, that initial “don’t use surgical masks” statement was because hospitals were already facing shortages, and a rush on the supply would have caused massive widespread longstanding shortages. Basically, the hospitals needed disposable masks, so the CDC told people not to use disposable masks.

      But it was also in that brief time period between surgical masks and reusable cloth masks. So the messaging was basically just “don’t use disposable masks” because the “disposable” part was implied because it’s all that was commonly available on the market. Plus cloth masks hadn’t been studied yet. So when cloth masks were proven to work and the CDC started recommending them, the naysayers fell back to that initial messaging from when the cloth masks were unavailable and unproven.

      • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        that initial “don’t use surgical masks” statement was because hospitals were already facing shortages, and a rush on the supply would have caused massive widespread longstanding shortages. Basically, the hospitals needed disposable masks, so the CDC told people not to use disposable masks.

        That makes it worse that they said/implied masks won’t protect you, not better. If CDC public health statements are driven by an intention to manipulate public behavior rather than disseminating the best available info about what is true, that means that those statements are unreliable and can’t be trusted, regardless of the good they are hoping to do by trading their long term credibility for temporarily adjusting purchasing habits.

    • m0darn@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      The messaging could have been clearer but I’ll spell it out for the dumb.

      Phase 1:

      Don’t panic buy medical supplies expecting them to protect you. We don’t have enough, and frontline healthcare workers need them to protect themselves and others, you don’t know how to wear them and they probably don’t fit you properly.

      Phase 2:

      We still don’t really have enough medical grade masks but just fyi: any sort of mouth covering will reduce the risk of a contagious person sneezing into the mouth of a vulnerable person. If you have to go out, please wear something over your face. Cotton is better than nothing.

      Phase 3:

      A tight fitting mask really is best, it limits a contagious person’s generation of aerosolized clouds of viruses, and limits a vulnerable person’s exposure to clouds of aerosolized viruses.

      • Makeitstop@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        The problem with messages 1 and 2 is that too many people will not give a shit about other people, and will also assume they can put a mask on correctly. If your goal is to prevent panic buying and hoarding long enough to build an adequate stockpile for medical workers, you probably want to avoid anything that makes those supplies sound superior and valuable.

        If I were crafting such a message, I’d say something like this:

        "At this time we aren’t recommending the use of disposable masks by the general public. For now, those who will be wearing a mask should wear one that’s made of tight knit, layered cloth, with a fit that fully encloses the nose and mouth. Cloth masks can be cleaned and reused, and will be easier for most people to wear properly, especially when worn for extended periods of time.

        These guidelines reflect our current understanding and will be updated as we learn more."

    • lunarul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The way I recall it seeing thing unfold and not really following the political stuff at the time:

      CDC said that cloth masks don’t stop viruses. You need a medical mask for that, but please don’t use those because hospitals need them. That was all true.

      In other countries, notably South Korea, almost everyone wore masks, and the numbers showed their effectiveness.

      So CDC realized that indeed, if everyone wears one, it greatly reduces transmission of the virus. It doesn’t have to be perfect to be efficient.

          • Fridgeratr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            Just a dumbass anti-masker. I didn’t see their response to me, maybe it was a bit too spicy lol

            • systemglitch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 years ago

              I only said that about 90% of people got COVID. Or something to that effect.

              Wear a mask, get your shots, it doesn’t matter to me. From my observations it just didn’t seem to matter much, almost everyone ends up getting COVID eventually.

              I really have no idea why this discussion was shut down Reddit style. I’m not advocating for anything.

              • Fridgeratr@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 years ago

                It is weird that they just deleted it. All I got in my messages was that my comment was removed because “nuke.” Not sure what that’s supposed to mean…

                Sorry for calling you a dumbass. You seen reasonable

    • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      You know the important thing was to slow the spread right? So that not everyone has it at the same time completely overcrowding hospitals. Which still happened in some areas due to idiots

      • systemglitch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        I think it would have been healthier for society to get it over with asap. We are still dealing with the fallout of shutting half of society down.