TL;DR, Feddit.UK is down, we’re working on making a fun replacement!

A number of days ago, feddit.uk had kicked the bucket.

The community on there had noticed months ago that the owner was inactive. This was around September (Going off of memory). So they arranged to set up a new community run by the same feddit.uk admins (except the owner, the only one who had host access) which would replace it. However, on the weekend as Quackhouse was going to be launched, the owner responded to an email and made two users admins. Emperor and GreatAlbatross. However, they did not have access to the console, just lemmy adminship. Ever since, the owner has been AWOL. The community were too afraid to go back to setting up Quackhouse incase the owner showed up again.

Unfortunately, that wariness and being afraid led to the worst case scenario happening - Feddit.uk has dropped offline. We believe the instance has reached some form of file size cap. It was basically an aeroplane flying with dead pilots before then. And it appears that aeroplane has crashed.

If you are from the feddit.uk refugee base, please join the new community whenever it is ready. Do not sign up now. We are busy and still setting up and don’t want an influx of new users just yet.

For now, sit tight. I’ll update this post whenever it’s up and running and ready for sign-ups. I am not posting the name for now so we don’t get overrun with sign ups. But we would love to invite you back to our community when it’s set up.

The new community will have it’s own unique identity that doesn’t have to piggyback off of Lemmy and Reddit for it’s name. But it will still aim to be the main UK lemmy instance that feddit.uk was. By all means, it will be a full lemmy instance, still federated, etc. It should be the same experience as feddit.uk. But we actually do have fun plans to create a nice sense of identity with that instance if all goes well! I will warn you, it does have a silly name, but that was the name that was decided upon.

We look forward to having new members. All are welcome, whether or not you were from Feddit.UK or not. We will have the theme be a UK-based lemmy instance.

I’ll try and remember to update this post when we are ready.

~20CX12

  • Vub@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 years ago

    Wow. If this isn’t a perfect example of the possible problems with federated networks I don’t know what is.

    I’m still for it of course. But it has to be done right and this is far from that.

    • exocortex@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 years ago

      it is possible now to copy your data to another account on another instance.

      in the future lemmy might even support something like having your account automatically backed up to another instance. Similar to a backup email address at your main email address.

    • pbsds@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 years ago

      All the instances that popped up during the reddit exodus were not that thought through. Once the feddiverse stabelize around sustainable communities it’ll work better

    • npz@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I think it shows some of the strengths of federated networks. If the owners of a small proprietary social network ghosted their project, it would take a huge effort to try to replace it, which would be insurmountable for many communities. But in this case, a community can fork onto a new server pretty quickly and seamlessly.

    • ExFed@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Hard disagree. This is a problem every web service has had to deal with since the beginning of the web: what happens when a host (either the machine or the person) stops working? How do you keep the service up?

      Centralized services solve that problem with internally funded, transparent redundancy. Federation solves the problem with externally funded, highly-visible redundancy. They’re still the same solution, just a different way of going about it.

      You could argue that user identity is lost due to the discontinuity between instances, but that’s probably something the Lemmy devs could fix without too much hassle.

  • RBG@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Shows once again that federation is useful since other servers are running and you could post that message.

    On the other hand, sucks if you had your main account on that server because now you start from scratch. I am not even talking about your lost posts and comments, more about community subscriptions. Quite annoying to get that all in place again. I used to have an account on the fmhy.ml instance, it was not fun…

  • CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 years ago

    If you leave it too long, folks will just register for another instance, and all momentum will be gone.

    I wouldn’t take too long getting the rescue boat out when folk are in the ocean…

    • 20cx12@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      Unfortunately we had planned on getting the boat out before that happened. But it happened anyway. For now the instance seems to be back up, but this was a wake-up call.

    • SomeoneElse@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      My thoughts exactly; from a moderator standpoint it just doesn’t make sense to wait for another UK dedicated instance to open at an unspecified point in the future. It’s too much of an unknown quantity. If I need to move/copy the communities I moderate while I can still access them on feddit, I’m moving them now and to an established, decent sized instance - it’s my best chance of not having to do this again in the future.

  • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    As I mentioned in another discussion, the fediverse needs to work like crypto mining pools, you join the pool of servers that share the data load, but you’re just there for data redundancy, users don’t “sign up to your server”, they “sign up to the website” that all servers are hosting together, if you go offline another server has your data so the website never goes down in the end.

    • Blackmist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah, unless I own all my own data, the Fediverse doesn’t really solve anything. Sure, I could host a server just for me, but if everyone did that would it even work? Or would it collapse under the load of all the data whizzing about behind the scenes?

    • BluesF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 years ago

      This seems like a much better way, in many ways it would be more robust. There would be problems though… This would be even more vulnerable to EEE. Disputes/hostile action between servers could damage the whole website (I’m talking about maliciously hosting CSAM for example).

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        It’s an issue with the current method too and hosts could decide if they host NSFW content or not with the risk and curation responsibilities that entails if they do (as we can see with Pornhub you can get in trouble for hosting porn stuff that isn’t CSAM).

        • BluesF@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          I doubt that if one server was hosting CSAM that law enforcement is going to be charitable with the rest of the site just because technically it was just one server. I’m admittedly not at all sure of the legal precedent here… But I suspect the site would be judged as a whole, if not by the law then certainly by the public.

          • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            It’s already a thing on Lemmy at the moment and it’s not as if people were talking about the various instances as separate websites when they talk about Lemmy.

            It would be fairly easy to have a post info page that mentions what servers (including redundancies) the content is hosted on.

            Anyway, the ideal solution would be that NSFW content has its own website (LemmXXX! I’m a genius) separate from the rest so as not to potentially create legal issues.

  • Lvxferre@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 years ago

    I will warn you, it does have a silly name, but that was the name that was decided upon.

    Damn, I was almost going to suggest some stuff. (chippym.uk - chippy, UK, a rodent…)

    Serious now. I’m glad that federation means that people aren’t putting all their eggs into the same basket; sure, feddit.uk going MIA is a loss, but just imagine if it was a non-federated platform. Hopefully the old users will be able to build their new home in the new instance.

    • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Seems to be up at the moment still.

      Sounds like it went down at the worst moment (right before the holidays, of course) and the admin wasn’t available to bring it back up. If the instance admin is serious about this and wants to keep it running, maybe finding some trustworthy users there that would be willing to act as admins would be a good contingency plan to ensure it doesn’t stay down for long.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      Will there be contingency to stop this from happing with other instances?

      That depends how each instance is set up, just like any other website.

    • joenforcer@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      With the way federation currently works, it’s impossible, sorry. It’s one of the pitfalls of a decentralized system without consolidated ownership: any of the nodes could fail at any time and the responsibility of bringing it back up is the sole job of that node owner.

  • GreyShack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    Thanks for the update and for the work in building the new instance!

    I’ll be keeping my eyes open for further news.

  • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    What happens to the accounts and communities that were on feddit.uk? I made an account there to create !hellointernet@feddit.uk, but I spend most of my time on sh.itjust.works. Are there any tools to move existing content from the old site to the new site in a (somewhat) cohesive manner, or are we starting over from scratch?

    • Tatters@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      2 years ago

      I assume no-one, including the feddit uk admins, can access the server to copy anything off it, so it will all be lost.

      • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Isn’t one of the benefits of federation that content is backed up in multiple places?

        For example, I can still view all the content at https://sh.itjust.works/c/hellointernet@feddit.uk, despite not being able to access https://feddit/c/hellointernet.

        The Hello Internet community was tiny and not very active, so it’s no big deal to start over from scratch, but it might be worth looking into for some of the larger communities which had compiled large quantities of information.

        • DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          I guess I’m kind of asking / supposing, but I wouldn’t be surprised at all if lemmy / activitypub doesn’t really work that way.

          As in, posts to feddit.uk are stored on feddit.uk. If you read a thread from sh.itjust.works/c/whatever@feddit.uk then sh.itjust.works server will pull it down from feddit.uk and show you the post. It may even cache a copy of the post to show it to another user, but that’s not the same as backing up the post.

      • SomeoneElse@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        Any indication of when that might be open? I understand you don’t want to be flooded by too many sign ups at once but you’re not giving any concrete information at all. Wouldn’t it make sense to at least invite the mods of the larger communities currently hosted on feddit.uk to join yours now so they can more easily move their communities over?

  • cooopsspace@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    2 years ago

    We still calling displaced Internet users “refugees”? Seems a little disrespectful to actual refugees with real issues.

    • Mr_Blott@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m sure actual refugees have more to worry about than whether you’re offended on their behalf, mate

      • cooopsspace@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        I am certain actual refugees want to be taken seriously rather than have their collective noun watered down by upset internet users.

        • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          Imagine, if you will, being so boring that you have to pick fights about how people word things.

          Listen, he said “refugees” and maybe that wasn’t the right word. But you know what? Both you and I both understood what they meant by that.

          The point of language… any language is to portray ideas between different people. In that context, OP did a fantastic job of that. we understood. Job done.

          Instead of providing any discussion of any value or merit, and apparently having the personality of wet cardboard, you chose to critique his word choice on how to describe those displaced by the issue.

          Nobody was confused. Nobody is going to conflate the struggles of actual refugees with the inconvenience of feddit being unavailable. There’s no confusion here. Fighting to reclaim the word “refugee” when nobody gives any shits about it (except you apparently), is certainly not going to win you any awards. I promise that refugees care less about what they’re called, or who appropriates the term for inappropriate uses, and they care more about migrating to a country where they will be safe from harm.

          Nobody is standing up and being proud of their refugee status, demanding that we treat their term with more respect… I know refugees, and I would think that all of them would have preferred to not have been forced to become one. Nobody chooses to be a refugee, you do it because you’re scared for your life. Scared of your neighbors, government, and national authorities. Nobody wants that.

          I know that refugees are proud of the fact that they now live in a place that’s not like the place that they left, but I have yet to meet one that’s proud that they had to flee.

          I’m pretty sure they couldn’t possibly give less of a shit about someone misusing the term “refugee”.

            • Mr_Blott@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 years ago

              I’m sorry but this is a really offensive comment for dyslexics. Don’t you know how lucky you are to be able to read?!? Oh my god so angry I’m shaking rn

              👆 You

              • cooopsspace@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                2 years ago

                The irony is that a dyslexic person shouldn’t be offended at someone else’s ability to read.

                Yet refugees like me, my parents, friends and family have a right to be offended about the misuse of the word refugee.

                • Mr_Blott@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Ah yes, pretending to be offended on behalf of a minority to gain attention, then when called out on it, pretending to be the minority themselves to gain favour

                  Your “refugee” parents simply didn’t give you enough attention when you were a kid, huh? 🤣

        • Mr_Blott@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          I’m sure you think you’re making the world better, but I promise you, you’re not. You’re just trying to make it more about you, and it’s insufferable