I’ve been considering paying for a European provider, mounting their service with rclone, and thus being transparent to most anything I host.

How do y’all backup your data?

  • GregoryTheGreat@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    The only type of data I care about is photos and video I’ve taken. Everything else is replaceable.

    My phone —> immich —> backblaze b2, and some Google drive.

    Linux isos I can always redownload.

  • PieMePlenty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    Manually plug in a few disks every once in a while and copy the important stuff. Disks are offline for the most part.

    • vector_zero@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      I really want to use tape for backups, but holy expensive. Those tape drives are thousands of dollars.

      • erogenouswarzone@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        So tape doesn’t make sense for the typical person, unless you don’t have to buy the equipment and store i.

        But, if you’re even a small company it becomes cheaper to use tape.

        Companies don’t like deleting data. Ever. In fact some industries have laws that say they can’t delete data.

        For example, the company I work in is small, but old. Our accounting department alone requires complex automated processes to do things each day that require data to be backed up.

        From the beginning of time. I shit you not. There is no compression even.

        And at the drop of a hat, the IT dept needs to be able to implement a backup from any time in the past. Although this almost never happens outside of the current pay cycle, they need to have the option available.

        The best way they have to facilitate this (I hate it - like I said they’re old) is to simply write everything multiple times a night. And it’s everything since we started using digital storage. Yes, it’s overkill and makes no sense, but that’s the way it is for us. And that’s the way it is for a lot of companies.

        So, when we’re talking about that amount of data, and tape having a storage cost advantage of 4:1 over disk, it more than pays for all the overhead for enterprise level backups.

  • grayman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    Local to synology. Synology to AWS with synology’s backup app. It costs me pennies per day.

    • redballooon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Same, although aws is my plan b. For plan a I have an older Synology that is a full backup target.

      • grayman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        On site? I put enterprise drives in my nas. Always have and have never had a drive fail. If one does, raid is good until the replacement arrives.

        • redballooon@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          Raid is no backup. Raid helps you against drive failure.

          Backup helps you if you or some script screwed up your data, or you need to go back to last months version of a file for whatever other reason.

          Aws helps if your house burns down and you need to set up again from scratch.

          • grayman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Versioning is a feature completely separate from raid or dual nas or whatever else you do. Your example of the house burning down is exactly why I questioned the dual nas… Both nas will be toast.

            So please, tell me again why you need 2 nas for versioning? Maybe you’re doing some goofy hack, then ok. That’s still silly. Just do proper versioning. If you’re coding, just use git. Don’t reinvent the wheel.

            • redballooon@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              I’m stunned that you are unfamiliar with the versioning feature of backups. In my bubble this has been best practice since Apple came along with the Time Machine, but really we tried that even before with rsync, albeit only with limited success.

              This is different from git because this takes care about all files and configurations, and it does so automatically. Furthermore it also includes rules when to thin out and discard old versions, because space remains an issue.

              Synologys backup tool is quite similar to Time Machine, and that’s what I am using the second NAS for. I used to have a USB hard drive for that task, but it crashed and my old Synology and a few old disks were available. That’s better because it also protects against a number of attacks that make all mounted paths unusable.

              Git is not a backup tool. It’s a versioning tool, best used for text files.

              • grayman@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 years ago

                Your condescension is matched only by your reading comprehension. I do not know what your requirements are. You said coding and alluded versioning, so I tossed out git. Enjoy your tech debt. I hope it serves you well and supports your ego for many years.

                • redballooon@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Your condescension is matched only by your reading comprehension.

                  Bruh. Look into a mirror.

  • BlueBockser@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I do an automated nightly backup via restic to Backblaze B2. Every month, I manually run a script to copy the latest backup from B2 to two local HDDs that I keep offline. Every half a year I recover the latest backup on my PC to make sure everything works in case I need it. For peace of mind, my automated backup includes a health check through healthchecks.io, so if anything goes wrong, I get a notification.

    It’s pretty low-maintenance and gives a high degree of resilience:

    • A ransomware attack won’t affect my local HDDs, so at most I’ll lose a month’s worth of data.
    • A house fire or server failure won’t affect B2, so at most I’ll lose a day’s worth of data.

     

    restic has been very solid, includes encryption out of the box, and I like the simplicity of it. Easily automated with cron etc. Backblaze B2 is one of the cheapest cloud storage providers I could find, an alternative might be Wasabi if you have >1TB of data.

    • Gooey0210@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Also you know it’s also possible to setup backups on the drive connect, also a good thing to turn off the networking beforehead 😶‍🌫️ (Also it’s possible to do “timer usb hub”, it’s not very off-site, but a switch can turn on every X days and the machine will mount it and do the backup, then the usb hub turns off (imagine putting it in a fireproof safe with a small hole for a usb cable))

      Also, i’m using ntfy.sh for notifications And if you’re using raid, you can setup it with on a drive failure

    • BigNerdAlert@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      How much are you backing up? Admittedly backblaze looks cheap but at $6 Tb leaves me with $84 pcm or just over $1000 per year.

      I’m seriously considering a rpi3 with a couple of external disk in an outbuilding instead of cloud

      • BlueBockser@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Oh, I think we’re talking different orders of magnitude here. I’m in the <1TB range, probably around 100GB. At that size, the cost is negligible.

  • nbailey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Device sync to nextcloud -> rsync data & db onto NAS -> nightly backup to rsync.net and quarterly offsite/offline HDD swaps.

    I also copy Zoneminder recordings, configs, some server logs, and my main machine’s ~/ onto the NAS.

    The offsite HDD is just a bog standard USB 4TB drive with one big LUKS2 volume on it.

    It’s all relatively simple. It’s easy to complicate your backups to the point where you rely on Veeam checkpointing your ESXI disks and replicating incrementals to another device that puts them all back together… but it’s much better to have a system that’s simple and just works.

  • ebits21@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Synology NAS where all computers get backed up to locally. Restic for Linux, Time Machine for Mac, active backup for Windows.

    NAS backs most of its data (that I trust enough to put on the cloud) encrypted to Google drive every night, occasionally I back the NAS up to an external 8tb hard-drive.

  • CatsGoMOW@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    I have a Synology NAS that holds all my important data. Then it does nightly backups to Synology C2.