Strange New Worlds has been my favorite Trek since Next Generation, and if the quality continues, could easily be my favorite Trek ever. But with the e.p. wishing for more episodes per season, there’s a danger of diluting the show by adding weak episodes that would have never made it in a 10 episode season.

One of the things I’ve long admired with BBC shows is their normally low-episode seasons, which kept out a lot of filler that normally made it in to the broadcast shows from the states. But streaming (and before that, cable) changed things. Finally US based shows were able to create much lower episode seasons, allowing the creators to tell more of the story they wanted to tell, without stretching things out (too much), or being forced to add stories they weren’t thrilled with in order to fill the season. (Though, even with shorter runs, shows are still doing this. Picard season 2, for example, could have used some trimming. So, yeah, show runners are still being forced to fill seasons where X number of episodes were ordered before the story was fleshed out. Maybe it just seems more evident in serialized shows.)

I can’t help but think a longer season of SNW would be a “more is less” scenario. I’d much rather see Paramount create another Trek show that’s mainly episodic, that’s been shown the same attention to quality that SNW has received.

  • gogreenranger@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’ve been rewatching TNG and it has become very, very apparent to me how much of the charm of the show was due to two things:

    1. The sheer chemistry of the cast. Since really learning how much they all loved each other, it really just feels like a ship of joy.

    2. The filler episodes let you spend time with the cast. I mean, you rarely get something like a whole scene about Data painting, or stroking a fake beard, or Geordi striking out with multiple women, or Troi extolling the virtues of chocolate sundaes.

    I’ve been really impressed by how much SNW has been able to do with the ensemble, it really feels like the cast have relationships, so if we can get more of that, yes please!

    I almost want to believe that they’re cancelling Discovery to give more resources to SNW’s production schedule. ;)

  • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 years ago

    Next Generation was your favorite, and it had 24 episode seasons. Episode count and quality are not necessarily linked.

    • lucidinferno@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      TNG is my favorite for now because it finished well, in spite of the notoriously bad episodes that were in each season. SNW hasn’t finished yet and could screw things up, so I can’t say it’s my favorite yet. But when comparing the two seasons of SNW to any two random seasons of TNG, SNW wins. Episode count and quality aren’t necessarily linked, true, but my point is that there’s a higher chance of introducing poor episodes when the season is longer. A longer season could produce 20 great episodes instead of 10, but I have yet to see a show where this happens.

      Up until Trek started streaming, the longer seasons were all we had, so comparing NG to all the other shows before streaming, it’s my favorite. Mainly comes down to the characters for me, as I think the storytelling in the network shows after TNG were just as strong as seasons 3-7 of TNG. And even though Disco and Picard had shorter seasons, they suffered under the weight of having to fill a predetermined episode count with a serialized show, so yes, episode count and quality aren’t necessarily linked. But an episodic show with a shorter season means the show runners can be picky with the episodes they want to film, much as a chef can be picky with what dishes they want to present.

      • v_krishna@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        It took me far too long to understand what NG meant. Why would you do this I feel TNG is an incredibly standard abbreviation

  • changingfmh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 years ago

    Michelle Hurd has been championing longer seasons of television for the sake of job security. We really just need to accept that 10 episode series are not there to “cut out the bad stuff” but to put the cast and crew in a worse position. Produce less content, if it “flops” then you’ve only spent so much and can cut everyone loose and recoup the loss elsewhere instead of investing jn the future.

    I think more episodes of SNW would do the show a lot of good. Right now, the status quo (in my eyes, at least) is gimmick episodes. We’re not getting nearly enough “normal” Trek. Season 2 specifically has mostly been gimmicks, crossovers, and bottle episodes. You really need to construct before you deconstruct, make a status quo before you break it. It would make these big episodes stand out more.

    • PuppyOSAndCoffee@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Not just this that, but how s2 ended…

      BRUH

      Don’t do us like that!

      spoiler

      I don’t mind a little bit of tune in next year but to chop it off like that is totes BS

      So…

      More episodes would allow SNW to be more things for more people, and try to color outside the lines of traditional sci fi drama. Some people love the quirky episodes, and that’s cool. I am not into musicals; however, if there is one “that time I went to band camp” episode a year that doesn’t fill a 10 ep slot, ok, whatever. 10eps is REALLY SHORT.

  • BeardedPip@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    The traditional American 20+ episode format is superior and I have no problems dying on this hill. It is the format that got almost everyone into Star Trek, and as such we are limiting ourselves with binge-junky 10 episode format.

    • lucidinferno@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Epic poems, such as the Iliad, were the preferred storytelling methods at one time, yet society had little issue with building upon that as they left it behind. It’s one thing to prefer something, and another to say that because something was once one way, that’s how it always should be. Things change and hopefully improve. Kind of the main theme of Trek.

      • Richard@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        However, the message of Trek also is that not all change is good, already evident in the M5 episode of TOS. There’s no shame in taking a step back if the prior state was superior, which some think it is (with regard to the 20 episode scheme)

  • StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 years ago

    20 seems unrealistic given the longer shooting time per episode and actors’ wanting flexibility to be able to work on more than one project.

    12-15 however seems very possible especially with the episodic format. Producing a longer season after the strike especially would seem wise. It would also allow Paramount to take a brief hiatus midseason (the way Discovery did originally) to stretch out the schedule.

    SNW has already demonstrated that it is an ensemble show with a full cast that can basically carry or star in their own episodes. Not every main cast member needs to be on set every production day, and even the principal character, Pike, can step back in some episodes.

  • fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I see it as something exciting. There are countless incredible science fiction writers out there and a longer season could mean more opportunities for their stories to reach the screen.

    Rewatching TNG recently, I’ve relished the longer seasons with loads of interesting stories. And with things being episodic, a weaker episode doesn’t ruin everything (unlike Discovery and Picard).

  • maegul (he/they)@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    My feeling watching SNW is that it isn’t getting enough space to breath more and chew on its subject matter more. I’d bet the writers and show runners are voicing the same thing … if they had more episodes they’d totally be able to fill them out with good stuff. In a way, organically growing from short episode counts into greater seasons might be a good way to go. Lots of comparisons to TNG etc here, and in those cases, maybe a shorter first season might have actually worked well.

  • adam_y@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    I’ve talked to some folk who work in TV about just this.

    The upshot is that knowing the length of run with enough time creates better episodes whether the run is short or long.

    The problem is something getting big and an emergency demand for more episodes after a season has already been planned out. (or that episodes need to be cut for a reduced run).

    As for the BBC, we are still very much waiting for the clock to run out on Casualty, Holby City, EastEnders, silent witness…

    I’d also argue that even despite a shorter episode length, Sherlock still managed to overstay its welcome.

    • lucidinferno@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Don’t even get me started with Sherlock. 😂 Greatest show of all time ever to jump the shark.

    • BeardedPip@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      With the strikes there is no way to assume the next season has been fully planned out. Now is a great to expand the show. I’d rather more SNW than another spin-off or series.

  • buckykat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    I don’t understand this idea that fewer episodes is better. Basically my only complaint about SNW season 2 is how rushed it felt.

    • Richard@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      How did it feel rushed? We had a new adventure every week that was largely unrelated to the previous one, and character development was distributed all throughout the season. The only thing I felt was rushed were some of the episodes like the one with the tower (Among the Lotus Eaters) where the resolution to the conflict came very surprisingly and abruptly, but longer seasons wouldn’t have changed that.

      • buckykat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        The big one is Chapel and Spock. She goes straight from pursuing him to leaving him without much of any actual relationship in between. Pelia doesn’t get to do much as the chief engineer, and Ortegas barely gets any screen time at all.

  • Vordus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    Honestly, I think SNW is in a pretty decent position for a larger episode order. Heck, having more episodes to create more space between TOS character guest appearances would probably do the series good.

  • Tired8281@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    I don’t see the problem. They obviously would hire more people to do double the episode load.