jointhefediverse.net seems to be a commonly linked resource for directing people to join the Fediverse.

Curiously, it does not list Lemmy under the list of Reddit alternatives. Their GitHub README explains why.

Previous relevant discussion: https://lemmy.ml/post/78808

  • @catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    722 months ago

    Lemmy was removed due to:

    • reports of how the developers handle certain types of content (post removed, view an incomplete archive)
    • the behavior of its creator
    • how the sotware itself handles users’ privacy.

    All valid concerns.

    • @Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      322 months ago

      No, they’re not.

      how the developers handle certain types of content

      Doesn’t matter if you stay away from .ml.

      the behavior of its creator

      Kind of valid, but open source and open license negates a lot of that.

      how the sotware itself handles users’ privacy.

      You think anything else on the Fediverse is better? When you post something publicly, it’s public. Doesn’t really matter what the software does. If you don’t have End to End encryption, it’s not private.

      • @petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Doesn’t matter if you stay away from .ml.

        And they are. They have delisted Lemmy as a recommendation.

        Kind of valid, but open source and open license negates a lot of that.

        It’s really bad PR. I don’t recommend Lemmy to people because of this shit.

        You think anything else on the Fediverse is better?

        If their servers delete content you want deleted, yes.

    • Skiluros
      link
      fedilink
      English
      432 months ago

      Point 1 and 2 really need to be addressed.

      It would be so much better if lemmy wasn’t developed by genocide white-washing tankies.

    • comfy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      152 months ago

      The linked post given on the second point is a bit flimsy. It’s basically saying that if you use evidence published by a person with shitty views, you must have them too. To me, that’s absurd as claiming that referencing FBI statistics makes someone a federal agent.

    • ZeroOne
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 months ago

      No they’re not, go back to school & relearn what FediVerse is