AI is super interesting, and can be a valuable tool. But I feel like some managers, especially those who rarely use AI and don’t know the limitations of LLMs still have a strong case of FOMO because competitors are using AI and they don’t want to fall behind.

Crazy, good thing independent batteries are mandatory now.

There has to be a lot of redundancy, yes. Batteries should keep the recorders running. The RAT should also deploy and provide power. At leat that’s what I would guess. Just waiting for some of the aviation experts on YouTube to make an analysis.

Being able to form armies that move as one is already a great improvement that could reduce a lot of managing late game. Same with reinforcements which will find their way to the front alone in Civ VII.

There’s a pretty good game as well on Steam called Nucleares. Very challenging but cool to be able to walk around the plant .

It will be like that in France as well. But once they have the tools, there will be abuse.

That would be great. It would mean that Asobo concentrate on the technical core of the game. 3rd party devs can then build on it. I am a great fan of the HPG H145 for example. There are nice missions already but the devs have to work with the limited tools they have today. The animations don’t look great. A better physics engine and more powerful animations could help make the missions look more life like.

Another vote for Kicad. I have done a small project with it and it worked perfectly.