• Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    I’m pretty sure its the other way around: this frog would have been the inspiration for the character.

    animals often are. especially unusual ones.

      • Smoogs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 days ago

        a combo. Pretty sure wolverines don’t break their own bones to grow knuckles

        • Binturong@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 days ago

          Well the comic character also doesn’t do that, so that kinda is my point actually. Maybe we can compromise on Wolverfrog.

          • Smoogs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            …i can see someone didnt even bother to look at the diagrams or read any deeper about this frog

            frog has been around well before the character

            • Binturong@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 days ago

              I can see someone entirely missed the point of the exchange, but still possesses the irrational need to appear correct in insubstantial discussion. What else are you noticing?

              • Smoogs@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                4 days ago

                i dont believe in your fantasy that wolverine invented the claw coming out of the knuckles and some random frog just watched marvel and thought woopie ill try that.

                the intellect in these forums is dismal.

                I’ve never been more complimented by a downvote by a group of trolling idiots. certainly makes it easier which bad actors to block.

                • Binturong@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  The character does not break his bones to weaponize them, and the frog had no role in naming itself. Other people did that, just like other people in this thread pointed out the wolverine part of this species name came much later on and was clearly inspired by popular culture. This bit you’re doing of being absurdly, intentionally incorrect and then gaslighting everyone around you to get negative engagement is like a toddler smearing their shit on the tablecloth to get a reaction; It is tiresome. This is where we stop talking.

      • Smoogs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        5 days ago

        frog has been around well before the comic book character.

        the character trait idea could have come from the frog. authors do this all the time

          • Smoogs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            5 days ago

            i think youre replying to the wrong post. as this is exactly what im trying to dispell.

                • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  Lmao.

                  For anyone who actually cares, Wolverine the comic book character was first written in 1974. This frog was first discovered in the early 1900s, but it’s skin-piecing bone claw mechanism wasn’t discovered until 2008. It’s nickname of “wolverine frog” is 100%, definitively, objectively, named after the comic book character, and not the other way around.

        • Mommy Longarms@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Well yeah, the frog has been around. The name Wolverine frog is more recent than that though. More frequently it’s called a hairy frog.

          • Smoogs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            correct. its features of the knuckles were taken for the character. there seems to be some confusion for people to understand a character is newer than the frog and the wolverine name is newer

            not sure what it is you’re disagreeing with here.