• NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    113
    ·
    25 days ago

    RIP to the Endangered Species Act

    No chance the US government will forego money for their broligarchs because of environmental laws.

    But if you really want to overwhelm someone’s property with an unkillable native plant, I’d have to put Virginia creeper forward as a candidate.

    • potoooooooo 🥔@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      Get a few people. On one corner: bamboo. On another, kudzu. On a third, blackberries and mint. On a fourth, your creepers. Let the games begin.

      • NottaLottaOcelot@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        25 days ago

        Oh god, keep the bamboo and kudzu in their native environments. The ecosystem has been through enough!

      • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        25 days ago

        Should add sunchokes/Jerusalem artichoke in there somewhere, as they are food. I don’t think kudzu is? Lets replace that one.

        Sunchokes spread like crazy as long as they have full sun, and are super difficult to eradicate, but are thwarted by being planted in sunny clearings in densely wooded areas. They can’t spread into the shade.

        Make the land difficult for development, but useful for the community!

        • gnuthing [they/them]@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          24 days ago

          Kudzu is actually edible. It can also be used to make clothing and baskets. It improves soil by fixing nitrogen (it’s a legume) and prevents erosion. It’s so prevalent in the US because of its usefulness in preventing erosion. It can be used for animal feed. Issue is that it out competes native species, not that it isn’t useful

      • voxthefox@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        25 days ago

        My asshole of a neighbor planted a line of bamboo right on our fence line, so now once a week I have to go to my side yard and dig up roots or they’ll choke out my ac unit within months.

        • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          25 days ago

          If you dig down about 2 foot (or several inches lower than the lowest root you find) and install a rubber barrier that goes from the bottom of the trench to up above the soil, it wont be able to spread to you anymore :)

          You could use brick, stone, or cement, but if any cracks exist or form it’ll eventually find the way through, where that’s significantly less likely with a solid sheet of rubber.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    25 days ago

    And you think these assholes won’t just raze that stuff without a care in the world? Because they will. After that they’ll be sued which will end with a small slap on the hand, combined with “oh you!” and that’s it

    It’ll relatively cost you more to buy that tree and plant it, than it’ll cost them to just ignore all that

    • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      25 days ago

      Except no - starting elderberry shrubs is relatively easy. Not like scattering the berries on the ground, but sticking cuttings a couple inches into damp or wet ground in late fall works very well, with very good odds that they’ll be big enough to bear fruit in a year. It’s also very cheap if you have access to an existing tree.

      Apparently you missed this in the research I’m sure you did before commenting on the cost, and strangely the people upvoting you seem to be making the same mistake. Probably AI’s fault. (ooooh, he’s defending AI - nope, just criticizing misinformation)

      • LotrOrc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        24 days ago

        They are definitely going to either remove the Endangered Species Act entirely or just slowly keep dropping species from the list as and when it becomes convenient honestly

        • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          24 days ago

          They’re literally shooting people in the head in the street. If someone chained themselves to a tree to stop construction they’d just saw the person in half. Hasn’t been a single consequence yet

      • FluorideMind@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        25 days ago

        Still doesn’t make him wrong. They will ignore it and receive little to no consequence. I also don’t understand the hostility, infact it fits the “erm actually” meme so well I suspect trolling.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        24 days ago

        I think the word “relatively” in the previous comment is doing some heavy lifting.

        If you are going to spend a few hours of your limited free time to plant the shrubs, even if the materials and transportation are free to you, compare that with the relative cost of a small environmental fine to a trillion dollar company building a billion dollar data center.

        The people at the top might not even realize anything happened, if anything even does happen.

          • Darkonion@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            24 days ago

            That’s my favourite statement of the day. I’m lucky I’d put my drink down or there’d be a mess everywhere.

  • k0e3@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    24 days ago

    Lmao they don’t even care about humans. You think they’d care about beetles and berries??

    • Prior_Industry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      24 days ago

      Yeah I’m sure the guys on the ground would “accidentally” start the diggers before they were “aware” of the Beatles and berries.

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    25 days ago

    The law means nothing when lobbies of big corps can change it to their like, paying politicans as their spokespersons.

  • Smoogs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    24 days ago

    if today’s strategies are anything to go by : nothing is illegal if youre in charge

  • rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    24 days ago

    Oops a completely accidental accident happened where a van full of pesticide accidentally crashed head on into the tree and exploded it. Accidentally. Oh well, I guess the build is back on at least.

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    25 days ago

    even if that would be an obstacle, it would take mere hours for them to change the law and remove the protection altogether.

    • ranzispa@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      It does not take hours to change a law, but it is very quick to ignore a law and mow down a field. Now, whether the law will prevent them from doing that is a different thing. Someone would have to notice that they’re going to build in a protected area, notify the police and contact them officially to notify the error.

      At this point they may still ignore that, then you’d likely have to start a trial. If you’re lucky and you start the trial before they mow down the field, they’ll likely agree they made a mistake, pay for your lawyer and move to the field besides.

      There’s no need to change a law to fix something as simple as paying a couple lawyers.

  • minorkeys@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    They will simply cut whatever protections exist stopping it. Still do it, just don’t expect it to be a forever solution.

  • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    25 days ago

    This is actually more likely to end with you in legal trouble yourself rather than stopping construction. Artificial planting is fairly easy to detect as it doesn’t follow natural population distribution, and won’t fall under the protection laws. If they can prove who did it, they can be charged with fraud

  • Formfiller@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    24 days ago

    It’s pretty clear laws aren’t real anymore. Nothing will improve until these demons live in constant fear for their lives

    • barnacul@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      24 days ago

      Please regale us with all your tales of arson and sabotage. Surely you have just one or two to share with the group?

      • Bloomcole@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        I don’t live in the banana republic.
        You want arson?
        Today is the second day of protests where I live against budget cuts for education.
        These are only the teachers, the most docile group of the population.
        Europeans know how to fight for their rights.

        So yes, I will continue to ridicule the pathetic non-attempts of your subservient, embarrassingly weak population of sheep.