For reference: There is a duell in the module where a shaman tries to secretly help one NPC by continously casting Cure Wounds on him while supposedly only helping him “stand up” after he intentionally let‘s himself fall prone. To spot this, a PC has to specifically declare checking for interventions a then suceed a DC 15 perception-check despite being within earshot…

  • MurrayL@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    15 days ago

    People actually pay attention to spell components? I’ve been playing D&D for 20 years and literally every campaign I’ve ever played in just ignored them.

    • MSBBritain@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 days ago

      I tend to rule that any components are “assumed to be in the materials pouch”, unless there is a significant (relative to party wealth) gold price attached, in which case they need to be bought. In practice I found that only really seems to apply to resurrection spells.

      From there, the only thing that matters to me is can you reasonably perform or (roll to hide to perform) the semantic and vocal components, as well as get out the materials of your materials pouch in your current state.

      In practice this means I can ignore components 85% of the time, but can still temporarily de-power my players if needed for some reason.

      • Archpawn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        14 days ago

        They’re talking about verbal and somatic components. That spell doesn’t have material components.

        • jounniy@ttrpg.networkOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          Glad someone else knows it. As a player who frequently had to transcribe spells into roll20, I always just assume other people know the components certain spells take to cast and then end up confused if they don’t.

      • 𝕱𝖎𝖗𝖊𝖜𝖎𝖙𝖈𝖍@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        RAW verbal and somatic components give you away similar to making an attack. That’s why Subtle Spell and similar exist. There’s no “roll to cast secretly” mechanic on purpose, the benefit of being hidden is that you get advantage on your first attack

  • gaiety@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    15 days ago

    its also the lowest rated official module, after its prequel hoard of the dragon queen

    I did run it and it was a fun game all the same, but i made soooo many changes. if i could go back in time I’d teach myself how to make dragon encounters richer

    • jounniy@ttrpg.networkOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      I feel you. I’m currently planning to run it someday and there are just so many things I’ll definetly change.

    • jounniy@ttrpg.networkOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      I love this gem. The only thing they got a but wrong is that Bardic inspiration could actually be whispered, since it only requires the target to be able to hear you.

  • MSBBritain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    I mean, I don’t see an issue with hiding the casting of a spell from people. I do think it should probably be the other way around for players (do a slight of hand to hide the semantic/material components, and beat passive perception), but in principle I don’t see why you shouldn’t be able to hide those?

    • jounniy@ttrpg.networkOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      15 days ago

      Because it would make subtle-spell kind of redundant and why even use components in the first place if they cannot be used to tell you are casting something?