

Nice. Thanks.


Nice. Thanks.


I did a wikipedia search a few days ago and it says you can just insert all sexualities you want. So you could just use heterosexuality, right?


Out of couriosity: I have never played the game, so… is the game actually unplayable if you decide to be intolerant against one or more of these? (As in: Is the tolerance and representation part of the core mechanics or is this just meant as a statement?)


Even though I do not have a problem with treating the things mentioned with respect, something about this text irritates me, but I can’t put my finger on it. Which feels really weird because I don’t like the feeling of something being off even though I can’t spot anything that actually bothers me.
What template was he using before?


This as well. Because while a more diverse set of abilities would be cool, if you make it too diverse, everyone suddenly becomes a jack of all trades, master of many and that feels boring.


Very much this. It even feels very “rogueish” to employ that strategy and it’s far from broken, so I don’t see why you would ban it.


Not in my presence at least. I’m moreso mocking the meme format, as people keep using it whenever someone brings up that their build only works with thing x. I’ve seen it with free feats, smites, 1 level dips, specific feats, magic items, …
Some of those takes were reasonable. Some were not. And while the format was made to criticise overreliance on one thing, I feel like it’s sometimes used too easily. Relying on an abilities is not bad in itself. Some builds only work because of abilities. And while it’s fair to bring up that it’s a bit one dimensional, that doesn’t invalidate the build.
I’m afraid I never played the module. What’s down there?


Pretty much, yes. I also think it’s not necessary for characters not to become better in all abilities even as the game goes on, but I generally like that characters typically continue to have weaknesses as they level up. Th unfortunate part is that those weaknesses are a lot less punishing for some classes then for other.
How did it come to that?


Definetly. Though some role-players might find it annoying that it creates the impression that your character just eventually becomes decent at everything.


I think I don’t get the “plausible deniability” thing.
Great comic by the way. I just read up some things about Durnan and was really happy to see him here.


First Pete Complete now Ahdok. Why is everyone getting married these days?


Okay I didn’t even consider those two. I don’t get how casting it one more time after you fail would help though, it why failing would help in general.


Only if they somehow got access to the spell.


Or that. I think it stills leaves room for Shenanigans though.


Ah I see. But farfetched, but I get it.


Hm. Then I don’t see the connection to this meme. Maybe I’m just stupid though.
You are aware someone else already posted this several days prior? I know you’re uploading a lot of memes, but at least check whether something was already published here.