It also makes the Rhino a fairly competent celestial warrior.

Wait what?

Because a flying Rhino is a pretty absurd rules interaction.

Option one sounds a lot cooler and more impressive, but option two sounds funnier.

I love this gem. The only thing they got a but wrong is that bardic inspiration could actually be whispered, since it only requires the target to be able to hear you.

I feel you. I’m currently planning to run it someday and there are just so many things I’ll definetly change.

Glad someone else knows it. As a player who frequently had to transcribe spells into roll20, I always just assume other people know the components certain spells take to cast and then end up confused if they don’t.

Some do. I know I do. It limits what casters can do at least a little.

Because it would make subtle-spell kind of redundant and why even use components in the first place if they cannot be used to tell you are casting something?

Funnily enough, intellect devourers can actually mimic the target they are inhabiting quite convincingly, thanks to inheriting their memories. I once had an Alhoon in a campaign who made use of that fact. The players never found out, but its really terrifying to think about.

You are aware someone else already posted this several days prior? I know you’re uploading a lot of memes, but at least check whether something was already published here.

Nice. Thanks.

I did a wikipedia search a few days ago and it says you can just insert all sexualities you want. So you could just use heterosexuality, right?

Out of couriosity: I have never played the game, so… is the game actually unplayable if you decide to be intolerant against one or more of these? (As in: Is the tolerance and representation part of the core mechanics or is this just meant as a statement?)

Even though I do not have a problem with treating the things mentioned with respect, something about this text irritates me, but I can’t put my finger on it. Which feels really weird because I don’t like the feeling of something being off even though I can’t spot anything that actually bothers me.

What template was he using before?

This as well. Because while a more diverse set of abilities would be cool, if you make it too diverse, everyone suddenly becomes a jack of all trades, master of many and that feels boring.

Very much this. It even feels very “rogueish” to employ that strategy and it’s far from broken, so I don’t see why you would ban it.

Not in my presence at least. I’m moreso mocking the meme format, as people keep using it whenever someone brings up that their build only works with thing x. I’ve seen it with free feats, smites, 1 level dips, specific feats, magic items, …

Some of those takes were reasonable. Some were not. And while the format was made to criticise overreliance on one thing, I feel like it’s sometimes used too easily. Relying on an abilities is not bad in itself. Some builds only work because of abilities. And while it’s fair to bring up that it’s a bit one dimensional, that doesn’t invalidate the build.

I’m afraid I never played the module. What’s down there?