This seems like it should be in the LinkedInLunatics community.
Bonus points if you take all those words you wrote, sort them alphabetically, and publish them as ~3k word works. Challenge the STEM community to reconstruct your original papers.
Fun fact: Hooke’s law (f= kx for springs) was originally published as an anagram - all the letters in alphabetical order. Latin, of course.
Lol someone is equating writing the next twilight saga to research, which requires (checks notes) … research
This is like the myth of the 10x AI developer. Even if I could code 10x faster, coding is only maybe 25% of what I do at best.
I know of a manager who unironically believes this for internal corporate technical reports (ours are academic style and more rigorous and formal than they need be…). It’s not quite to this extent, but I’ve overheard conversations where the manager apparently can’t fathom why their subordinates are incapable of double digits over a year.
Was even Paul Erdös that productive?
I remeber something about monkeys and typewriters 🤔
Easy there Mr. Hubbard!




