• Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        OK…
        But would it be a problem if I did?

        Or are there areas to protect invasive species? I don’t think that’s a thing?

        So, still don’t get it.

        • TragicNotCute@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          38
          ·
          1 month ago

          I think the general idea is that you shouldn’t mess with conservation land. The general public isn’t educated enough to know what is invasive and what isn’t, so the rules say don’t disturb stuff. But if someone who was educated was in the park removing invasive species, they are almost certainly “breaking the rules”, but doing a net positive thing.

          So if you see it…you didn’t.

          • Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            ls “conservation land” something special, then?
            English Wikipedia seems not to know it, and dictionary translated it to “Landschaftsschutzgebiet” in my language, which is like the most unprotective “protection” category there is.
            Basically you could even build a huge tourist ressort or industrial complex in one of those if you know what you are doing…

            • TragicNotCute@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              ·
              1 month ago

              I’m from the states and I took this as “national park” (or perhaps state) land. It’s land intended for ecological conservation.

              • Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 month ago

                But in that case, pretending to be a blind prirate makes even less sense!

                From the National Park Service website:

                Report invasive species. Locating invasive species just as they are beginning to invade an area and treating new infestations quickly is a management approach called Early Detection Rapid Response (EDRR). In a national park, let a ranger know when you spot invasive species. They will want to know the location (GPS coordinates if possible), the name of the invasive species, when you saw it, and photos of the species.

                So thoroughly note it and report that stuff!

                • TragicNotCute@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Well yes, those are the rules. But if I see someone ripping out invasives themselves…

                  I didn’t see it.

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 month ago

              It could mean anything from private land with an easement to prohibit building on it to a National Park, depending on context and jurisdiction. It’s just a non-specific term for “land that is conserved in some way.”

              • Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 month ago

                Yeah, I guessed that much myself by now.

                So there is no deeper meaning but the meme is just crappily ill-defined and because of this actually doesn’t make sense.

                • grue@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  I mean, it’s sufficiently descriptive to imply that randos shouldn’t (ordinarily) be messing with the plants on it. As a native English speaker, it makes sense just fine.

              • Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 month ago

                I did, even did some additional research trying to clear up ambiguous terms (what’s a “conversation area”?) and looked up rules in another country (US) that was referenced by a less confused person.

                Meme still doesn’t make sense.
                Should even be the complete opposite.
                If you recognize it, report invasive species!

                If there are hidden context clues I missed, please point them out to me, so that I will learn why I am the moron and not some of the others here that post stuff that just don’t make sense given the facts.

                Is the original post perhaps satire of some kind?

            • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 month ago

              The nomenclature is really messy across countries and even sub-country entities. The Portuguese language Wikipedia even highlights the mess:

              Nomenclature diversity across countries. // Some surveys estimate protected areas in different countries and regions are called by at least a hundred names, and not uncommonly countries have their own categories of protected spaces, roughly similar to the protected space concept defined by the IUCN.

              From that I guess the restrictions associated with those spaces also change, and in some you aren’t supposed to remove local fauna and/or flora, creating situations like in the meme (removing invasive species is against the letter of the rule, but within the spirit).

  • boolean_sledgehammer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 month ago

    I live on a few acres of conservation land. All my homies smash lantern flies when we see them. Get wrecked, you tree destroying fucks.

    • Pyr@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Depends on the rules. Some places it would be illegal to disturb anything in conservation areas like parks but other areas it would be illegal to ignore invasive plants and not remove them.

      • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        but other areas it would be illegal to ignore invasive plants and not remove them.

        I’ve never been in a park or area where you, as an individual, were legally liable for not removing invasive species.

        That being said, I did get in trouble for having thistle in my yard, but there was a specific city ordinance against thistle, and not against invasives as a whole (otherwise most of the fucking neighborhood would be torn up, which TBH would be great.)

        • Pyr@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          Well not as an individual but the owners/caretakers of the land are legally required to remove it and remediate the area.