• Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Both are owned by the same corporations (Vanguard, BlackRock, Fidelity, State Street, Geode…), who’ll win either way. Until the bubble bursts, that is.

    • hobovision@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      Vanguard and Fidelity don’t really own that stuff. They’re managing the wealth of customers. The funds they have are almost entirely or entirely owned by customers.

      Vanguard and Fidelity make money so long as people hold money in their funds. They win pretty much no matter what. The bubble bursting will mean they make less money, but they can’t really lose money because they don’t own the underlying equities.

  • Megaman_EXE@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m surprised one of these companies hasn’t bid against the AI bubble yet. Like have they considered going against the grain when there’s obvious push back could actually increase profits?

    Could you imagine a world where Microsoft went back to a windows 7 Era where shit just worked how it was supposed to and was super solid? I feel like people would appreciate and buy into a product that just works.

    Maybe I’m completely off base here but in my mind having a product that… y’know…actually works and does what it says it does is valuable.

    That is unless there’s just so much money being thrown at them to force AI into their products that they seemingly cannot refuse, which could very well be the case. But it just feels weird

    • salacious_coaster@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 months ago

      I feel like people would appreciate and buy into a product that just works.

      The general public are no longer the market, but rather the product. Most of us have been demoted from customer to cattle. They don’t care what we want. We’re here to generate data for them to sell.

  • Powderhorn@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m typing this on a Surface, so I’m not inherently anti-MS, but they’ve very clearly given up on the consumer side, which is an industrywide trend.

    AI is sort of like having a plug. If you know you want it, it’s easy enough to find.

  • network_switch@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s internet explorer vs Netscape navigator. Even Safari. Gemini gets pushed by Android phones. MS lost the smartphone OS war. Also lost TVs. Also lost home assistant speaker/mics. Microsoft and every other company without a major mobile OS under their unbrella is fighting a battle with a major handicap against Google

  • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Competition is actually a good thing. Nobody wants a single giant corporation to control the majority of a technology. However I am not sure if this is really a good thing, because this means Microsoft will invest more into Ai, buy more graphics cards, fire real engineers and so on. Is competition a bad thing for once?