fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 8 months ago"Does Hitler have a right to privacy?" and other big questions in research ethics.mander.xyzimagemessage-square75linkfedilinkarrow-up1291arrow-down18file-text
arrow-up1283arrow-down1image"Does Hitler have a right to privacy?" and other big questions in research ethics.mander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square75linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squarelmmarsano@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·8 months agoWould a Hitler clone be morally culpable of someone else’s actions?
minus-squareozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·8 months agoRemoved by mod
minus-squarelmmarsano@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·8 months agoWouldn’t that make you an immoral monster who “should still be killed as quickly as possible”?
minus-squareozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·8 months agoRemoved by mod
minus-squarelmmarsano@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·8 months agoMaybe if logical consistency is silly. You argued in favor of killing someone unjustifiably. Moral principles mean nothing to you?
minus-squareozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·8 months agoRemoved by mod
minus-squarelmmarsano@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·8 months agoI don’t think you’ve even broken it down to yourself. Killing a person who hasn’t done anything wrong is inherently immoral. It’s basic logic & moral reasoning.
minus-squareozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned from communitylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·8 months agoRemoved by mod
minus-squarelmmarsano@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·8 months agoNah, brah. It’s settled: you don’t explain it because you can’t & simply lack moral principles. The only one being “silly” about it is you.
Would a Hitler clone be morally culpable of someone else’s actions?
Removed by mod
Wouldn’t that make you an immoral monster who “should still be killed as quickly as possible”?
Removed by mod
Maybe if logical consistency is silly. You argued in favor of killing someone unjustifiably. Moral principles mean nothing to you?
Removed by mod
I don’t think you’ve even broken it down to yourself. Killing a person who hasn’t done anything wrong is inherently immoral. It’s basic logic & moral reasoning.
Removed by mod
Nah, brah. It’s settled: you don’t explain it because you can’t & simply lack moral principles. The only one being “silly” about it is you.