You must log in or # to comment.
I bet the wheel would be better if it was written in Rust.
(Disclaimer: I have never actually written Rust.)
Hello, Rust developer. [My name, etc.] It works fine, and is written in C++. [Rest of challenge is the same.]
Truly diabolical
But it’s not memory safe!!
I know!! How can Jigsaw claim it “works fine”? He’d probably say something like “it’s battle-tested and state of the art.” What does that even mean??
*passes Valgrind*
rust is a terrible material for wheels. Corrosion is not usually a good thing.
I think they mean to write the word “wheel” into surface rust.
Look, I’m not saying the wheel is wrong. It rotates, but what if two people try to turn the wheel at the same time, in opposite directions?
What if—instead of risking misuse of the wheel—we have a
my_wheel::Wheel, which only one person can rotate at any given time? The multiverse could enforce this safety at compile time by making it impossible for there to exist a universe where two people both think they own the right to rotate the wheel. In fact, it could even make it impossible for me to lend out the wheel to more than one person at a time.And, maybe… we could make the wheel even better. Cars rest on top of wheels, sure. But what if I wanted to make a car that rests on top of other cars? If we rotate the super-car’s wheels, we don’t want to make the sub-cars flap around—we want the sub-car wheels to rotate. It would be more future-proof to make a
Wheeltrait, then to makeRubberTyreimplementWheel. Then, if we ever needed to make cars into wheels, we could have them also implementWheel—but delegate the responsibility of rotating to their own wheels.In fact, we should make it into a whole library. Our other projects could need wheels. Mr. Mittens might need them eventually!
If the goal is speed then just use a few turbofish.
Disclaimer: I have never actually written Rust.
neither have most of the people advocating for (or against) rewriting stuff in Rust lol
Developer: Kill me if you must but i’ve turned the wheel into a modular service called systemd-wheel
GNOME developer: “Stop forcing us to use wheels! Why can’t you just import GTK in your project?”
Here’s the real question… What licenses are the wheel and door using?
I bet it uses ffmpeg…
I read that as ffmpreg, and I thought it was some new ao3 trope where two girls impregnate a guy or something.
No no, ffmpeg is completely different! It refers to two women pegging a man.
That is horrible! How ridiculous and just horrible! What’s the url so I know what to stay away from?
I don’t know what the url is, but I remember as a wee child exploring the internet before pictures were quick to load, and the text was all we had, finding a story about a wife discovering her husband sexting with another woman. They proceeded to surprise him, and yes, a strap-on was pulled from a bag. The only phrase from the story that I can recall was him describing it as a telephone pole being shoved up his ass.
…I’ve never been able to find it again. If you find such a thing, don’t ever let it escape you.
I volunteer as tribute! (Anything, anything, is worth having two girls blow you. My god, it’s full of stars.)
i have some news for you as to what pegging is
I say again, I volunteer as tribute! I’ll take a pineapple in the ass if that what it takes to get blown my two women again.
good news, then!
That does not have to be a contradiction
Least brainrotted fediverse user
Does the wheel fall under any cumbersome non free licenses or patents? If I want to modify this wheel to suit my needs, then share that work and information with others, am I free to do so?
If I want to modify this wheel to suit my needs
Steepled fingers
Evil laughing
Another victim!!!
It is MIT licensed, but it’s not implemented in rust.
Clearily it must therefore be rewritten.
The wheel is Open Domain and does not belong to anyone.
There is a whole extra spoke in the wheel. Look, I’m not gonna reinvent it… I just… need to… adjust some values… and there! Look, its fine.
Wait.
Why is it wobbling like that?
Hold on, I just need to get rid of this other spoke…
One of the worst parts about this is that I would never have thought about reinventing it until he told me not to.
Bloody reverse psychology still working on me. >:(
I’m thinking WaaS
I’ll just steal the wheel and reinvent it later
gasp! You wouldn’t download a wheel!
Do you work for Apple?
Better make sure the wheel isn’t under copyright tho!
Reinventing the wheel leads to a profound understanding of why wheels are round.
That’s what documentation is for.
Documentation is written exclusively for people with PhDs.
That involves knowing how to read
Not necessarily.
The wheel has had a number of innovations over the years. The earliest wheels were flat disks of wood that were heavy and slow turning. The Romans invented spokes and metal rims which made them faster, more durable, and gave them more traction. Questions we need answered: What is this wheel in particular designed to do? Is there any way we could make it work more efficiently at its task? Do we value performance over reliability, or vice versa? Etc. Etc.
I think we need to take a bit of a step back and consider what kind of shed we might use to store this wheel…
To answer that, we’ll need to do a deep dive into foundation technology (to determine if it is lacking and needs some improvements) (because we don’t want our wheelshed to sink).
Sounds like proprietary blobs.
deleted by creator
Now we do have computers! Think of the models of wheels that could help us improve wheels!
All those wheels made without any unit tests. What was humanity thinking?
So, your plan is to kill people of starvation and sleep deprivation?
This is a poorly designed horror trap. Here, let me help you!
Hmm… How many significant figures of pi was it made to?
Astronomer: “Eh, I guess pi is close enough to 10. Let’s just use that.”
Gotta make that configurable now
ONE
