• Infernal_pizza@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      7 months ago

      The only reason Pluto is no longer a planet is because we discovered there were loads more planets and couldn’t be bothered to acknowledge their existence!

      • shneancy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        7 months ago

        i’ve spent 25 years on this blue marble fascinated by space, and only recently discovered there multiple long orbit dwarf planets going around the sun??? that is so cool why is this not widely known!

      • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s been like that for decades to be honest. Ceres used to be called a planet, but you don’t see anyone complaining about it’s demotion

      • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        but so what?

        we used to have a handful of elements, but when we kept discovering more, we didn’t change the rules to have elements, and “strange elements” so schools only have to teach about 16 elements.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          It’s all just made up categorization. It’s like that because astronomers have agreed to categorize them like that. That’s all.

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            7 months ago

            NASA says there are only 5 dwarf planets in the system. But, it’s all pretty arbitrary. The line between planet, dwarf planet and asteroid are all pretty fuzzy.

            An alien civilization looking at the Sol system might say that it’s only got one planet, Jupiter. Everything else is so much smaller that they’re not really significant.

            Another logical cut-off would be that planets had to be bigger than any moons in the system. If we went by that standard, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, Earth, Venus and Mars could all still count as planets, but Mercury would get ditched because it’s smaller than Ganymede and Titan.

            What’s funny is that we’re still using the name “planet” which comes from “asteres planētai”, meaning “wandering star”. For the Greeks what mattered wasn’t the size or the mass, it was how bright they were. That meant that a tiny object near the sun like Mercury (Hermes) got the name planet, because despite being tiny, the fact it’s close to the sun means it reflects a lot of light. And Jupiter (Zeus) and Saturn (Cronus) got named not because they’re so big, but because they’re big and far away from the sun, which means they reflect sunlight in a similar way to the much smaller inner planets. Earth’s moon might have been given the name “planet” if it had been a lot smaller and/or further away.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      The most performative “hurr durr science” bullshit ever. Who fucking cares if Pluto was considered a planet when you were a kid?

      Not you specifically. There are people who really seem to care about this shit.