• Thatuserguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    7 months ago

    Honestly shocked? Everyone I know has seen it and has a good opinion of it. Just assumed it was doing well I guess

    • radix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      7 months ago

      worldwide total of $355M. While these numbers might seem respectable at a glance, multiple reports hinted that the film’s break-even point was in the $500M range

      There’s no way it actually cost $500m to make. If there’s a failure at all here, it’s expensive marketing. But when it comes to profit/loss for individual movies, Hollywood Accounting makes it all meaningless at that level.

      “Did it entertain me for ~2 hours?” is the only question anybody outside a boardroom should be concerned with. All the rest is gossip and schadenfreude.

      • TheImpressiveX@lemm.eeOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        7 months ago

        There’s no way it actually cost $500m to make.

        You’re right, there isn’t. The real, reported budget is $180 million.

        The reason it needs to make $500 million to break even is because the studio doesn’t get the full box office gross - 50% of it goes to the theaters (because they don’t show movies for free).

        So it needs to make double the budget, plus an additional hundred million or so, to cover the marketing costs, putting the real breakeven at around $450 million.

      • simple@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 months ago

        It seems to be within the “normal” realm of blockbuster movies. I don’t remember who said it exactly, but advertising is usually ~2-3x the budget of a movie. The reported budget of thunderbolts is 180 mil. That leaves at least 300m for advertising.

        • MimicJar@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          7 months ago

          The film was heavily marketed as well, so I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s on the higher end.

  • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    7 months ago

    Went, thought it was ok, worth the evening, theater was decently populated

    DISNEY: FAAAAILURE

    the issue isn’t attendance, it’s profit margins.

  • Omega@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 months ago

    Not entirely unexpected. Marvel fans loved it. General audiences are burnt out from wildly varying quality.

    However, this is the type of movie that will start building back confidence if they can put out more quality movies.

    • Raltoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 months ago

      Article is a week old, it has apparently made another $150m or so in that time. And it’s on track to beat the other low performers.

  • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    7 months ago

    I wonder how much are box office numbers being depressed by people just waiting for the Disney+ release? I can’t be the only one that’s regularly skipping the theater to watch it on my comfy couch with my cat.

    I thought it was the goal, in a way. Pump the subscription numbers at the cost of theater and home release sales?

  • Jessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    My son and I just wait for marvel movies to be released on Disney+ these days. Why go to the movies, spend $50 after two Extreme 2D tickets, popcorn and drinks if I can wait for it to be released on a service that is included in the cost of my cellphone plan? Not to mention the ability to watch it comfortably at home, over dinner, with the ability to pause it if either of us needs to use the bathroom. We used to go to the movies often, pre-COVID. Now we just wait a bit for it to show up on torrent sites, or a streaming service we subscribe to.

  • JusticeForPorygon@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 months ago

    I was/am excited to see it but I am also flat fucking broke and can’t go see it unless it happens to be shown in a small town near me where tickets are only like $5

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Hmm… Thought it would do better…

    https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt20969586/?ref_=bo_tt_tab#tabs

    Domestic (49.2%) $181,849,601

    International (50.8%) $188,095,613

    Worldwide $369,945,214

    But I guess that’s what happens when it’s pretty much a sequel to Black Widow and a bunch of Disney+ shows.

    https://www.boxofficemojo.com/title/tt3480822/?ref_=bo_se_r_1

    Domestic (48.4%) $183,651,655

    International (51.6%) $196,100,000

    Worldwide $379,751,655

  • kemsat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m not surprised. I felt like it was a movie no one asked for since it was announced.

    I went, and I enjoyed it, but I didn’t think it was as good as I’ve seen many on the internet say it is. I’ve also enjoyed most of the movies since Endgame, so I’m probably a weird fan.

  • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Interesting, considering it was the only Marvel movie with a point to make besides “friends are cool to have.”

    I mean, that was also the point, but it always will be.

    Also the other point was American democracy is hopelessly corrupt, reform doesnt work, become a vigilante.