• qarbone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    It’s only permanent if the target critically fails. Which puts all of the wording into question.

  • Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 months ago

    The final game of my favorite series of all time, Quest for Glory 5, you get a shrink spell. It does exactly what you think: It shrinks your enemies down to 50% their original size… and then when you cast it again, they flee when they get too small to do anything to you… and you can still cast it on them as they flee and shrink them down further and further.

    I… just never used the spell. I mean I did want to maximize all of the skill level of my spells (but there is no discernable effect to the skill of that particular spell). It just felt really needlessly cruel. I imagined the enemies going on a Honey I Shrunk the Kids type adventure, only it is much shorter and extremely brutal…

    • Kichae@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      80
      ·
      8 months ago

      Because most people are not so anal retentive as to give a damn about Hasbros trademarks.

        • 1ostA5tro6yne@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Then you should use it as generically as possible so that the trademark becomes unenforceable. Brand dilution is a thing, it’s why Alphabet doesn’t want you using “google” as a verb, and why your mom was actually based for calling your Playstation “a nintendo”.

    • PineRune@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      The Pathfinder video games are directly from the Pathfinder tabletop game, which is basically a different copyright of D&D. They would need a DM. I’m not sure what else you could be thinking.

      Edit: DM = Dungeon Master (D&D), GM = Game Master (Pathfinder), as this user pointed out below.

            • Susaga@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              24
              ·
              8 months ago

              It is actually a good strategy to dilute the term Dungeon Master into a general phrase, because that means Hasbro can’t enforce their copyright. For instance, Aspirin is a brand name, but it’s such a generic term that anyone in the US can call their product Aspirin without risk.

              • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                We’ll have to agree to disagree! I prefer using the game’s defined term, or Game Master for general usage.

                Edited to add, you TTRPG players sure are a contentious people.

                • ulterno@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Well, when the players enter a dungeon, it becomes the Dungeon Master.
                  Everywhere else, it can be a Game Master. Inside the game of course. If they go outside the game then… well, then that’s just another guy in the outside.

      • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        GM is also used in GURPS, but the 5 guys here who have used it already know that.

        And if they want someone to join them, they can always DM me.

      • pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        Pathfinder is very different mechanically to dnd. It’s like saying settlers of catan is a different copyright of carcassonne.