fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agobrain blowing orgasmsmander.xyzimagemessage-square66linkfedilinkarrow-up1762arrow-down19file-text
arrow-up1753arrow-down1imagebrain blowing orgasmsmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square66linkfedilinkfile-text
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16221078/ https://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-close-in-on-why-octopuses-tragically-destroy-themselves-after-mating
minus-squarecm0002@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up115arrow-down2·1 year ago what’s the point, evolutionarily, to self destruct after reproducing? There is no point, evolution is about successful reproduction and everything else is just random chance. If a evolutionary tweak happens that gives your off spring better chances, but your arms fall off after sex then it’ll probably perpetuate.
minus-squareRedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up30·1 year agoUnless your species is a K Strategist where taking care of your offspring/group is essential.
minus-squareGBU_28@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·1 year agoBut that’s just moving the goalpost, so to speak. You’ve just built a different parenting framework that requires you to stick around. You’re still hunting the same goal: self sufficient offspring (Not negging you)
minus-squareRedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agoTrue, I’m just being pedantic and pointing out that “reproduce and that’s it” isn’t the case for some species. Some species carry it on to “reproduce and ensure your offspring reproduces too.”
minus-squarex4740N@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoWouldn’t it make them easier to he hunted by prey or just die from not being careful People with dementia can end up getting themselves fatally injured so I don’t see an octopus can’t So I don’t see how it’s beneficial to help them survive
minus-squarehelpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoIt’s not but, the evolutionary goal is compete. There’s no way for the octopus to pick a mate with out the side effect, so the lack of post-nut clarity continues through the generations.
minus-squareserenissi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down5·1 year ago everything else is just random chance. nope, then you’d see some of same species showing the behaviour, others not.
minus-squareactiv8r@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 year agoSorry I’m really struggling to parse what you are saying here 😄 my fault. Can you explain further?
minus-squareDemdaru@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·1 year agoTo my understanding: nope, then you’d see some of same species showing the behaviour, others not. Nope, then you’d see some animals of the same species showing the new behaviour while other animals, still of the same species, would not. Also my comment: We absoluteky see this, just on small scale tho. :|
There is no point, evolution is about successful reproduction and everything else is just random chance.
If a evolutionary tweak happens that gives your off spring better chances, but your arms fall off after sex then it’ll probably perpetuate.
Unless your species is a K Strategist where taking care of your offspring/group is essential.
But that’s just moving the goalpost, so to speak. You’ve just built a different parenting framework that requires you to stick around. You’re still hunting the same goal: self sufficient offspring
(Not negging you)
True, I’m just being pedantic and pointing out that “reproduce and that’s it” isn’t the case for some species.
Some species carry it on to “reproduce and ensure your offspring reproduces too.”
Just goon forever
Gooners win again
Wouldn’t it make them easier to he hunted by prey or just die from not being careful
People with dementia can end up getting themselves fatally injured so I don’t see an octopus can’t
So I don’t see how it’s beneficial to help them survive
It’s not but, the evolutionary goal is compete.
There’s no way for the octopus to pick a mate with out the side effect, so the lack of post-nut clarity continues through the generations.
nope, then you’d see some of same species showing the behaviour, others not.
Sorry I’m really struggling to parse what you are saying here 😄 my fault.
Can you explain further?
To my understanding:
Nope, then you’d see some animals of the same species showing the new behaviour while other animals, still of the same species, would not.
Also my comment: We absoluteky see this, just on small scale tho. :|