• @Godort@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1332 months ago

    I’m not worried about this specific apocalypse, if only because there is literally nothing that can be done to prevent it nor stop it if it starts.

    I’m far more worried about more localized, preventable, human-caused apocalypse like climate or nuclear war.

    • @Tower@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      172 months ago

      Exactly. Same energy as worrying about Earth being hit by a gamma ray burst - 🤷‍♂️

      • @ace_garp@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 months ago

        He is exceptional at writing hard sci-fi that unnerves you.

        I’m moderately certain, whichever future timeline we move to, there will be aspects of Egan’s works.

        Modern day Jules Verne, recommended to read at least one book of his.

  • @Feathercrown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    402 months ago

    Luckily, this is the epitome of that Epicurus quote:

    Why should I fear death? If I am, then death is not. If Death is, then I am not. Why should I fear that which can only exist when I do not?

    • @jwt@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 months ago

      Why should I fear death? If I am, then death is not. If Death is, then I am not

      Death will be, so we will cease to be. Sounds like he is was whistling past the graveyard with that quote…

          • @Feathercrown@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            When I was younger one day I was thinking about death and I suddenly truly understood the concept of nothing after death. When you die, the entire universe might as well go with you. Once you spend enough time with that realization, you’ll also realize it’s pointless to fear it. Or at least, I did. Hopefully it’ll work for you too.

  • @ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    322 months ago

    If our particular bubble of the universe has remained unmolested for 13.8 billion years, it is safe to assume it will continue to be for the next 1000 years.

    • @markinov@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      i don’t know quantum mechanics or much about particles. I watched a video on False vacuum decay, and it says if higgs change state it might change the laws of physics

      So can’t it be that the universe had change of states of other particles maybe in past (billions year before life) that changed the laws of physics and so on.

    • @Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 months ago

      Also it’s not like assuming it will collapse in the next decade will make any difference other than having a harder time enjoying the time before then.

    • @iAvicenna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 months ago

      didnt need the wikipedia page. soon as I read a couple pop sci articles on this I was like “welp this shit sounds dangerous it was nice to know you all”

      • @Comment105@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        02 months ago

        I’m about as worried about this as I am about galaxy eating monsters. Not at all, really.

        I’m more bothered by our apparently non-existent ability to detect and divert asteroids. More than that, I’m terrified of our habit of using global cataclysm as a strategic threat. But at the same time I feel like a species that acts like this probably should end themselves like that. Russian civilians consent to nuclear apocalypse.

        So yeah, not very bothered by idea of false vacuum.

  • Xanthrax
    link
    fedilink
    English
    68
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Wikipedia:

    "threat

    If our universe is in a false vacuum state rather than a true vacuum state, then the decay from the less stable false vacuum to the more stable true vacuum (called false vacuum decay) could have dramatic consequences.[5][6] The effects could range from complete cessation of existing fundamental forces, elementary particles and structures comprising them, to subtle change in some cosmological parameters, mostly depending on the potential difference between true and false vacuum. Some false vacuum decay scenarios are compatible with the survival of structures like galaxies, stars,[7][8] and even biological life,[9] while others involve the full destruction of baryonic matter[10] or even immediate gravitational collapse of the universe.[11] In this more extreme case, the likelihood of a “bubble” forming is very low (i.e. false vacuum decay may be impossible).[12] "

    Also, of course there’s a Kurzesagt

  • 👍Maximum Derek👍
    link
    fedilink
    English
    50
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Subatomically dispersed at the speed of light is probably the best way to go. And no one would be left to mourn you.