Which Linux command or utility is simple, powerful, and surprisingly unknown to many people or used less often?

This could be a command or a piece of software or an application.

For example I’m surprised to find that many people are unaware of Caddy, a very simple web server that can make setting up a reverse proxy incredibly easy.

Another example is fzf. Many people overlook this, a fast command-line fuzzy finder. It’s versatile for searching files, directories, or even shell history with minimal effort.

  • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think a lot of people don’t realise that yt-dlp works for many sites, not just YouTube

    I used it recently for watching a video from tiktok without having to use their god awful web UI and it was amazing

    • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      I heard about helix from you and I’ve used it for a year and a half or so now, it’s by far the best editor I’ve used so far and I can definitely vouch for it

    • Trent@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just commenting to give more love to helix. It’s my favorite “small quick edits” editor.

    • ObsidianZed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve actually been testing with fish recently coming from zsh, though I might wait until 4.0 fully releases before I make a more conclusive decision to move or not.

      With that said, I remember looking through omf themes and stumbled onto Starship that branched off one of the themes and really liked the concept.

      • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It does have clojure lsp support, but you’ll probably have to use a command line for most repls.

      • jennraeross@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Helix is a terminal based text editor. It’s much like vim / neovim, but unlike those editors it’s good to go right out of the box, no configuration or plugins needed to make it work well.

        Topgrade is one I haven’t used, but it looks like its intended purpose is to let you upgrade your apps with one command, even if you use multiple different package managers (I.e. if you were on Ubuntu, you could use it to upgrade your apt packages, at the same time as your snap packages, as well as flatpak, nix, and homebrew if you’ve added those.)

    • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I love jq, but I wouldn’t call it “surprising simple” for anything but pretty-formatting json. It has a fairly steep learning curve for doing anything with all but the simplest operations on the simplest data structures.

      • toastal@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not even pretty or accessible. 2-spaced indentation is incredibly hard to read.

  • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m a big fan of screen because it will let me run long-running processes without having to stay connected via SSH, and will log all the output.

    I do a lot of work on customers’ servers and having a full record of everything that happened is incredibly valuable for CYA purposes.

    • Static_Rocket@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d recommend tmux for that particular use. Screen has a lot of extras that are interesting but don’t really follow the GNU mentality of “do one thing and do it well.”

      • kitnaht@lemmy.worldBanned
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Tmux / Screen is like the emacs/vim of the modern day Linux I think.

        Screen is more than capable, but for those who have moved to Tmux, they will absolutely advocate for it.

      • darklamer@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        When tmux was first released I was already so used to screen that I never really considered switching. What would some convincing arguments be for me to make the effort to switch now?

        • notabot@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          The thing that got me to switch was being able to maintain my pane layout between connections. The various window and pane management niceties (naming, swapping, listing and the like) got me to stay. Now you can keep your screen, but you’d have to pry tmux from my cold, dead, tty.

        • Static_Rocket@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Tmux was purpose built for terminal multiplexing. You can assign session names for organizing and manipulating multiple instances. Send keys to and read output from detached sessions. It’s easy to script.

            • Static_Rocket@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Sorry, it was, just not for exploring all of those instances at once. Should have called out the tiling function. Screen also built in a serial terminal emulator and started playing with a few other things.

        • kablammy@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This was a few years ago so maybe it has improved, but I found that screen would crash and lose my session history and layout too often. That was bad enough, but when it happened it had some bullshit error message about a dungeon roof falling in. I don’t mind some comedy in code or even the interface, but don’t make light of the user losing their stuff. I tried tmux and it is much more stable than screen was.

    • surfrock66@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I know everyone likes tmux but screen is phenomenal. I have a .screenrc I deploy everywhere with a statusbar at the bottom, a set number of pre-defined tabs, and logging to a directory (which is cleaned up after 30 days) so I can go back and figure out what I did. Great tool.

    • villainy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Woah screen is seeing active development again? There was like a decade where it stagnated. So much so that different distros were packaging different custom feature patches (IIRC only Ubuntu had a vertical split patch by default?) Looking at it now, the new screen maintainers had to skip a version to not conflict with forks that had become popular.

      When tmux stabilized I jumped ship immediately and never looked back.

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not as useful, sadly. Nohup disconnects standard input, output, and error. With screen or tmux, you can reattach them later.

  • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Not powerful, but often useful, column -t aligns columns in all lines. EG

    $ echo {a,bb,ccc}{5,10,9999,888} | xargs -n3
    a5 a10 a9999
    a888 bb5 bb10
    bb9999 bb888 ccc5
    ccc10 ccc9999 ccc888
    $ echo {a,bb,ccc}{5,10,9999,888} | xargs -n3 | column -t
    a5      a10      a9999
    a888    bb5      bb10
    bb9999  bb888    ccc5
    ccc10   ccc9999  ccc888
    
  • harsh3466@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    zoxide. It’s a fabulous cd replacement. It builds a database as you navigate your filesystem. Once you’ve navigated to a directory, instead of having to type cd /super/long/directory/path, you can type zoxide path and it’ll take you right to /super/long/directory/path.

    I have it aliased to zd. I love it and install it on every system

    You can do things like using a partial directory name and it’ll jump you to the closest match in the database. So zoxide pa would take you to /super/long/directory/path.

    And you can do partial paths. Say you’ve got two directories named data in your filesystem.

    One at /super/long/directory/path1/data

    And the other at /super/long/directory/path2/data

    You can do zoxide path2 data and you’ll go to /super/long/directory/path2/data

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    1 year ago

    I know tmux is incredibly popular, but a good use case for it that isn’t common is teaching people how to do things in the terminal. You can both be attached to the same tmux session, and both type into the same shell.

    • Pika@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Tmux is so much better than screen, and yes that is the hill I will die on

      Specially when confined with tmuxp , it’s how I handle Game servers that can run headless to start at boot without losing access to giving commands to the server via its server console

  • DigitalDilemma@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    yes

    The most positive command you’ll ever use.

    Run it normally and it just spams ‘y’ from the keyboard. But when one of the commands above is piped to it, then it will respond with ‘y’. Not every command has a true -y to automate acceptance of prompts and that’s what this is for.

    • alvendam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      What’s the syntax here? Do I go

      command && yes

      I’m not sure if I’ve had a use case for it, but it’s interesting.

      • Raptorox@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        That will just wait for command to finish properly and then run yes.

        What you want to run is yes | command, so it spams the command with confirmations.

          • valkyre09@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Who said it was better? It’s just my favourite.

            Like my favourite shirt, it’s no better than the others, but it brings me a little joy :)

            • on a serious note though, thank you for sharing your two examples - I didn’t know they existed.
      • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        true delivers error level 0, false error level 1.

        yes && echo True || echo False will always be True.

        false && echo True || echo False will always be False.

        Common usage is for tools that ask for permissions and similiar. yes | cp -i has the same effect as cp --force (-i: prompt before overwrites).

      • DigitalDilemma@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Sorry, I should have explained that. it’s command | yes yes|command - Eg, yes|apt-get update (Not a great example since apt-get has -y, but sometimes that fails when prompting for new keys to accept)

        Edit: I got it backwards, thanks @lengau@midwest.social for the correction.

      • markstos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        For some cases I use “|| true”.

        The idiom accepts that the preceding command might fail, and that’s OK.

        For example, a script where mkdir creates a directory that might already exist.

    • communism@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Very useful for shell scripts that need to do maths as well. I use it to make percentages when stdout has values between 0.0 and 1.0

      • gens@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I once wrote a bc script that calculated parameters for the Blackman window for a FIR filter. (Had formulas already so not that impressive) Upped the precision until it needed like 30 sec to calculate, completely unnecessarely :).

  • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 year ago

    dd is probably well known, but one of the simplest and most powerful ways to accidentally delete all data on your hard drive. dd if=/dev/random of=/dev/sda

    • I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      ddrescue (or gddrescue) is a great version if you have a sick drive. It’ll try to copy the good areas first then go back to hammer on the sick areas.

      Not perfect as it doesn’t know about the file system so it tries to copy the entire surface, but generally a good tool.

  • UpperBroccoli@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    yq is crazy cool for converting between different text-based data formats such as yaml, json, xml, csv and others, and it has a super nice pretty-printing function as well. I use it all the time!

    Just be aware that your distroy might come with a yq variant too, but possibly one that isn’t as powerful as the one I linked. I know this to be true at least for Ubuntu.