• undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Well yeah, that’s how they got the 120 billion. This is the system working completely as intended. “It’s not a bug. It’s a feature.”

  • NickwithaC@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 years ago
    1. Buy shares in health insurer

    2. Get claim denied

    3. Sell shares

    4. Pay medical bills and watch the share price drop for added schadenfreude

  • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    In America, ostensibly the richest nation in the world, we ration healthcare whilst the right wing politicians jeer about Canada’s system as a slippery slope to “death panels” denying care. Whilst UHC and the gang do the same thing, and that’s ‘controlling cost’ or ‘delivering efficiency’.

    Distribution on a timescale is about capacity - if it’s slow for you to receive a service, that’s likely because there isn’t capacity. That capacity may have never existed because a bean counter deemed it more profitable to not hire nurses/buy dialysis machines/build a new hospital wing/etc. and have a backlog of cases.

    Or that capacity exists, but is sequestered and reserved for those who pay even more; personal doctors, private clinics, or specialists who are kept idle on contract for demand surges.