MataVatnik@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 years agoAnon questions our energy sectorslrpnk.netimagemessage-square346linkfedilinkarrow-up1991arrow-down1126
arrow-up1865arrow-down1imageAnon questions our energy sectorslrpnk.netMataVatnik@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square346linkfedilink
minus-squaredev_null@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15arrow-down1·2 years agoYeah, the environmental issues that are orders of magnitude less problematic than literally pumping the toxic chemicals into the atmosphere like with fossil fuels, vs comparatively miniscule amount of solid waste to store inert.
minus-squareT156@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 years agoCoal smoke is more radioactive than the outside of a fission reactor anyhow.
minus-squaremoitoi@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·2 years agoThe comparison is dumb. The subject was the comparaison, and not what type of energy is better for the environment. You’re interpreting.
Yeah, the environmental issues that are orders of magnitude less problematic than literally pumping the toxic chemicals into the atmosphere like with fossil fuels, vs comparatively miniscule amount of solid waste to store inert.
Coal smoke is more radioactive than the outside of a fission reactor anyhow.
The comparison is dumb. The subject was the comparaison, and not what type of energy is better for the environment.
You’re interpreting.