Disclaimer: this is purposefully obtuse.

Other effects in the game which explicitly state they kill you:

Shadows, succubi, massive damage, death saving throws, beholder death ray (notably not even their disintegration ray kills you), power word kill, vampires, mind flayers, night hags, drow inquisitors.

Clearly, if they intended for disintegration to kill you, they’d have said so. Since specific overrides general, and there is no general rule that disintegrated creatures are dead, I rest my case. QED.

  • Sumocat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I see no flaw in this argument. Instead of dying, the character exists like the guy from “One” by Metallica, desperately waiting for a stiff breeze to end his existence.

  • MimicJar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The spell specifies you turn into gray dust. Unfortunately gray dust has no listed stat block.

    Luckily it is mentioned in “Tales from the Yawning Portal”, “The floor of this room is covered with a layer of fine gray dust and ash, three inches deep.”

    Based on the rest of the description you are restricted to the room in which you turned to dust and the only action you may take is casting " Minor Illusion", with the added restriction of all illusions must be humanoid.

    • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nothing about the Disintegration spell says that your stats change. Compare to spells that do, such as Polymorph, or True Polymorph which even covers changing a creature into an object.

      • MimicJar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not changing your stats, you still have a 14 wisdom.

        You are however definitely turned into gray dust and I’m applying the rules as written about gray dust. The gray dust is restricted to the current room and can only form the shapes of various humanoids.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s probably the path I’d take as a DM if I had a player insisting on rules lawyering like OP. OK, you get to “play” as a pile of dust. Have fun sitting there until random wind currents blow you around.

        • frezik@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          If a guy is doing what you’re doing in this thread at the table, then yeah, I’d support them in leaving you there.

          • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.worksOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Doing what? Trying to play by the rules? It’s a game! Games have rules. If you can’t accept someone living out their pile of dust fantasy, which is clearly supported by the rules, then I think you need to take a long look in the mirror and ask yourself who hurt you.

            • frezik@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              You are 100% free to live out your pile of dust fantasy. I let you be a pile of dust. Isn’t that what you wanted?

    • thelasttoot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Disintegrate also specifies the creature can only be brought back to life with a true resurrection or wish spell. Which most certainly means it is indeed dead, otherwise, why mention bringing it back to life?

  • timgrant@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    You’re not dead when you’re petrified, either, which can lead to some pretty interesting exploits, rules-as-written.

    Petrified creatures count as creatures, not objects, so rules-as-written you can determine if a statue is a petrified creature by trying to target it with a spell that requires a creature for a target.

    With the cantrip Poison Spray, you can check for petrified creatures without using spell slots or risking damaging the creature, since it would be immune to poison while petrified.

    • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you want to go absolutely strict RAW with the creature/object distinction, resurrection spells don’t technically work. They target “a creature that died”, which, by an obnoxiously precise reading of the rules, can’t exist. After they die, they’re an object and not a valid target.

      I don’t understand why they can’t just make “dead” a state a creature can be in.

  • TipRing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, from your characters perspective, death is preferable to being transmuted to dust, especially in a setting with a well established afterlife.

  • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    You can be literally obliterated by a sneeze. And you’re so dusty, folks would need to make a Con check for allergies.

    • Comment105@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s not even in the scene.

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GX-m7UsCp3I

      Here’s what Walter actually says:

      How are you doing?

      …mumbling…

      How are you doing?

      You did the only thing that you could, I hope you understand that.

      Any thoughts on what our next move might be?

      Our next move. Our next move. Given the fact that at the first opportunity, Gus will kill us.

      No, no, we bought ourselves some time, yes, but… The question is how much. He will be looking for another chemist.

      Are you sure you’re…

      What do you mean?

      What page is that?

  • _NoName_@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Probably should go join the Thousand Suns Sons. They might set you up with some nice power armor.

  • Archpawn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why would it matter if it says you die? It’s not like there’s a rule that dead characters can’t take actions. Or that they transform into objects. Or get sent to another plane of existence depending on who they worship and their alignment while leaving an object behind.

      • Tiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nothing in the spell says they don’t. By contrast, Wild Shape

        Your game statistics are replaced by the statistics of the beast, but you retain your alignment, personality, and Intelligence, Wisdom, and Charisma scores.

        Also, a pile of dust doesn’t have a stat block because it’s an object. It’s not even sentient. But if you really really want to play as a lifeless pile of dust, knock yourself out.

        • iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Spells do what they say they do. So “it doesn’t say they don’t” isn’t a defense unless you think I could argue that Haste changes my Dex to 30.

          The spell also doesn’t say you become an object. Compare to True Polymorph!

  • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d like to imagine that this is how non-necromantic sapient undead creatures are created, someone has all their flesh incinerated away but somehow their soul clings to the bones, and bam sapient skeleton.

    In this case it could result in a poltergeist, which uses the dust to interact with things.

  • cryptiod137@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well memed, but it’s no fun to try to argue with someone who will take everything in bad faith, even as a joke.

    • SolOrion@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I disagree, I think it’s funny as long as this is all theory.

      If a player was actually serious about wanting to do this as more than a meme, and was arguing this hard for it I’d be mad as hell. In this context, though? It’s fine. I think it’s amusing how hard people can stretch the rules. It’s similar to the peasant railgun. Hilarious concept. I’m still not okay with someone trying to actually use a peasant railgun.

      • cryptiod137@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        In theory, sure. But not with OP saying “Nah-uh” to everything. There’s just no fun to be had.

        And I really enjoy arguing about game mechanics, just look back at me talking about that insect swarm/animal shapes nonsense people who know nothing about the game came up with.

        I’d say I’d agree but there is no stretching here, you’d have to rule that a creature that is missing every part of its body is alive. You’d also have to rule that a pile of dust has a maximum HP of more than 0, or else you’d also be dead instantly.

        You’d never get a death save, your already dead.