• @Subtracty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1622 months ago

    This is the danger of celebrity endorsement. It will bring so much more attention to an unworthy ‘cause’, and so many fans will now absorb this information without critical thought. It is truly a situation where a well-intentioned person does not know enough to understand that this supposed expert is talking nonsense and the world at large slips that much further into disinformation.

    • @burgersc12@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -372 months ago

      But I mean nothing Graham Hancock says is that damaging. He suggests that there really was an ancient Atlantis type civilization, which has been suggested by thousands of people including Plato. No one who listens to him talk is actually gonna be swayed against their beliefs one way or the other

      • @SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        592 months ago

        It’s damaging because it adds doubt to any kind of scientific consensus.

        “They” don’t want you to know that vaccines are dangerous.

        “They” are only pushing chemo for big pharma.

        “They” don’t want to admit that this was where ancient civilizations had some global empire.

        It’s the same kind of attitude of “fantastical claim you can believe if you just dismiss all the evidence that you don’t like”

        And that is very damaging because it further erodes understanding of the scientific method.

          • ZephrC
            link
            fedilink
            English
            422 months ago

            Distrusting the government is not the same thing as believing baseless gibberish just because it disagrees with science that has been used to inform government decisions.

      • @Andonyx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        722 months ago

        Plato did not suggest ancient Atlantis existed. He was very clear that he was illustrating a hypothetical “great society” to discuss his views on effective and beneficent government.

        When he discussed it sinking it was a divine punishment from the gods of Olympus because they had strayed from a righteous path. All of it is meant to be a parable.

        • @burgersc12@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -262 months ago

          I mean that’s our interpretation of a translation of something said thousands of years ago. But if they want to they can choose to believe what they want. IMO an ancient island sinking due to gods is no different than saying “high tech civ nuked itself out of existense” but with less context. I’m not saying this really happened, but its not like its impossible, just extraordinarily unlikely to be true.

          • @Andonyx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            I’m not sure if you’re arguing that it being fictional is an interpretation or that its demise from the ire of the Gods is an interpretation.

            If it’s the former, you are incorrect. The single best primary source being his own protege and student Aristotle who also makes it clear the whole thing is didactic invention. (There are debates that some individual events within the story are inspired by actual events in Egypt and Athens, but its existence is never presented as fact. The entire idea that this was some historical account came mostly from a judge writing his own history books in the 19th century.)

            This is also not debatable due to translation. It’s Plato. The best scholars of all time in both language and history have studied this, literally for centuries. There is not any serious or scholarly debate about his intentions with this story. And multiple, equally capable translations of Aristotle corroborate that.

            If you’re talking about the destruction of Atlantis, it’s been too long for me to argue that specifically, but the idea that it was divine punishment is the prevailing view of that story.

            • @burgersc12@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -30
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Even if all the scholars think it wasn’t literal doesn’t mean he didn’t mean it literally, that could just be how we have been interpreting it

              • @Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                192 months ago

                Plato wasn’t writing in some long-dead obscure language that we only have vague translations of, it was Greek. It’s not a matter of interpretation.

                • @burgersc12@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -18
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  You can’t even intrepret my English correctly, how can we assume we know what was going through some dudes head several thousand years ago?? Also I’d like to see where Plato wrote “I made it all up about Atlantis” cause AFAIK we just assumed this is the case

      • @Subtracty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        402 months ago

        The belief in the existence of a super-race (or whatever term Hancock uses) is dubious. While the idea on its own may seem harmless, it opens the door for racist idealogies. Everything has to be taken in context, and crackpot archeologists have been making this argument for ages in order to justify later arguments for eugenics.

        I know it may appear that Hancock questioning the established historians and “big archeology” is above suspicion, but it is done in an unambiguously dishonest way. He refuses to acknowledge sound logical arguments put forth by multiple well-respected sources and hand waves things away as common sense. Essentially, he is frustrating because his arguments muddy the waters of logical discussions and introduce doubt in a community that certainly does not get paid enough for this shit.

              • @WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                142 months ago

                Yes, if those people are technologically so advanced as to be indistinguishable from wizards. In Graham Hancocks mythology, these people brought the secrets of agriculture and advanced maths to indigenous peoples around the world. A lot of his evidence for this comes from ancient religious texts and artifacts. So, if these people are so advanced that they are worshiped by the natives I think it’s fair to say he is describing a super race.

                • @xwolpertinger@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  162 months ago

                  technologically

                  Not only that, according to his lore they also had psionic powers and could make stuff levitate.

                  Wonder if they were friends with the lost civilization on Mars (yes, he also believes this)…

                • @burgersc12@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -92 months ago

                  Sure techno wizards sound cool AF. Still don’t see how this is a super race when its just people who travel to other places after their civilization gets flushed. If we collapse and I move to south america am I a “super race” or did I just move a bit lol

  • @pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    23
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    shame. i hope he was duped and didn’t know what he was in for.

    that being said, can’t wait for the miniminuteman video.

  • @Martineski@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    So I just watched a 4 part video series which I think is 2-3 hours long total? Didn’t pay attention to lenght because it sucked me in and I was listening to it while doing some work. The level of misinformation, bending narrative and lies is just insane. I bet netflix just wanted to have their own “ancient aliens” style “documentary” because money obviously but the fact they present those lies and dare I say propaganda on their service as truth in form of a documentary is disturbing. I have no clue how did they even manage to get keanu on this shit because I’d assume he has people around him that would inform him about things given the reputation he has. I’m on a phone so I will send the comment first and edit in the debunking I watched soon after.

    E: A little over 3 hours total: https://youtu.be/-iCIZQX9i1A

    • @DokPsy@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 months ago

      Didn’t even have to click to know Milo has created another Googledy Bunker. It’s a great series and I recommend the rest of his work.

      By his, I mean miniminuteman

  • @Sgt_choke_n_stroke@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    262 months ago

    I’m OK with this dickhead claiming the things he’s claim but he doesn’t have EVIDENCE just speculation.

    That’s what’s frustrating

    • @DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      252 months ago

      “Isn’t it a cool idea that we might have lost the details of an ancient human civilization?”

      “Yes, absolutely, and we keep finding new evidence that behavioral modernity started earlier than thought, so it’d be awesome to find proof that-”

      “THE PROOF CAME TO ME IN A DREAM (OF GETTING A NETFLIX SPECIAL)”

    • @nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      232 months ago

      Everytime he’s asked for any kind of reasoning or evidence he goes straight to victimhood and how “mainstream archeology” doesn’t want you to know the real truth.

  • @wick@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    272 months ago

    Holy shit, they greenlit a 2nd season of that trash!? And he’s still crying like a bitch about being censored.

  • ekZepp
    link
    fedilink
    English
    18
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Why Keanu… why… 🤧

    Whatever. As long as he keeps doing good action movies I don’t give a damn of his beliefs. I still like Tom Cruise’s movies and he’s a scientology’s nuts.

    • Phoenixz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      162 months ago

      Tom Cruise is a great example of love the actor, hate the man.

      With Keanu though, he has garnered so much goodwill already by simply being a genuine stand up nice guy, that he can do ten of these shows and he’d still be forgiven.

      Having said that, this show is typical US brain rot, and one of the reasons why Americans are so scientifically illiterate

    • @SSJMarx@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      912 months ago

      Graham Hancock is a fraud who pushes a baseless conspiracy theory about an ancient civilization that spanned the globe that was destroyed before the last Ice Age. He’s successfully siphoned money away from serious archeological work with his specious bullshit, and right now he’s doing a series called Ancient Apocalypse where he pushes this hypothesis on Netflix. Looks like it’s going into Season 2 and Keanu Reeves appears in it.

      • @rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        92 months ago

        I thought, growing in Russia, that such things are not possible in the West. (They were and to some extent still are quite popular here, though, with Fomenko and thousand other freaks.)

        Do I look stupid?

      • @lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 months ago

        I think I might have watched 1 or 2 episodes of this? I thought it was weird how he was talking about how known history is totally wrong and the vast majority of people don’t know the truth. If it’s the same thing anyways. DNF though lol

  • Leraje
    link
    fedilink
    English
    792 months ago

    Dear Earth, apart from the many terrible things we have done historically, we, the British, are most recently sorry for David Icke, Andrew Wakefield and now Graham Hancock. We have tried to balance this out but one David Attenborough only goes so far.

  • @StrongHorseWeakNeigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Graham Hancock has a history within Ancient Apocalypse of very selectively editing people’s appearances on his show in order to make them appear more supportive of his crackpot theories than they actually are. Look up MiniMinuteMan on youtube for a complete breakdown and dissection of every episode of Ancient Apocalypse season 1. So, there is hope that Keanu is not actually that supportive of Hancock’s theories.

  • KillingTimeItself
    link
    fedilink
    English
    24
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    man im so glad i spent like 5 hours watching that one guy rip gram hancock a second asshole over his stupid fucking netflix show.

    This meme would make no sense otherwise. Fuck conspiracy theories.