I’m going to be building a new computer soon for myself. (Going AMD for the first time, since intel microcode issue.)

I would say I’m an expert or advanced user, as been using pcs for 25 years and set up arch and slackware in the past. I have tried many distros and would like some feedback.

I mainly use my pc for gaming. I want something customizable, KDE ish, and without bloatware. A good wiki is a plus.

I think that i may end up with arch… is it better for gaming since it’s bleeding edge and isn’t steamos built off it?

Side question is distro chooser accurate?

  • data1701d (He/Him)@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 years ago

    Personally, I find Debian pretty good these days. I used to default to Testing, but I’ve gravitated towards stable.

    Honestly, in the age of Flatpak and Steam, almost any distro works.

  • Veraxis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 years ago

    Arch w/ KDE gamer here. I have generally had a good experience with it. I think everything you said is generally accurate. In terms of customization, lack of bloat, and a good wiki, Arch is generally considered to be all of those things. A rolling distro like Arch I believe will also be getting the latest proton updates, which may help with sooner game compatibility/optimization updates on more recent releases.

    I say go for it.

  • zcd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    I game on arch (btw) But honestly I don’t think the distro itself really matters for gaming? Just choose the one you want and give er

  • ouch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    I use Debian stable because I’m tired of constantly twiddling with breaking stuff, I just want a distro that keeps working without issues and tinkering.

    If you still want to learn Linux stuff and debug packages, then go for a bleeding edge distro.

  • thayerw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    Fedora Silverblue (atomic GNOME) and Kinoite (atomic KDE) have been solid for both work and gaming. System maintenance is largely seamless and automatic once configured. I still use Arch daily, but only in the terminal (distrobox and containers).

    Going AMD is so worth it too, I have zero regrets swapping my RTX 2080s for RX 6800 XTs. Secure boot, Wayland, no fuss updates. Couldn’t be happier.

    You mentioned needing customization…not sure what you’re hoping for there, but the atomic distros allow for plenty of userspace tweaks. It’s the system-level stuff, like boot and greeter themes, that require a bit more work to implement. My time is too precious to fuss about that stuff these days.

    • Crazyslinkz@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Thanks for your response. I like to fiddle with things. I’m a bit of a tinkerer and like too customize various parts of my os. Basically more user space stuff. How it looks, buttons, themes, and whatnot. Also able to remove/avoid apps that I don’t use. Simple, but unique.

      May I ask, why fedora for core system, but arch for distrobox?

      • thayerw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        I totally get it as I’m a tinkerer too, but these days I spend most of that energy on webdev, house projects, thrifting/restoring stuff, etc. If only there was more time in a day lol.

        There’s plenty of freedom to tweak local themes with atomic distros, as your home dir itself is entirely mutable and can be changed to your liking.

        As to why Fedora/Arch… I love Arch and have used it daily for almost 20 years. I was an Arch dev once upon a time (Judd/Aaron era), and I designed the logo and web branding in use today. The project means a lot to me.

        The inherent benefits of atomic systems caught my attention a couple years ago, and Fedora’s implementation won me over.

        My hope is that Arch eventually (and officially) adopts a similar approach as these image-based systems become mainstream, at which point I’ll happily be the first in line for testing!

  • Petter1@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    In your situation, I would go for endeavourOS, since it is arch in easy mode (don’t need as much time as arch and works flawlessly on all my machines)

      • Petter1@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        I see 😄well, it makes sense if you think it is worth the time, and you are skilled enough to make the right decisions that endeavour would do for you😇 I for example love AUR but have no time dealing with Arch, that’s why endeavourOS

      • LeFantome@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Just uninstall eos-hooks and then comment out the eos repos in pacman.conf if you want vanilla Arch. Pretty easy journey. You don’t even have to reboot.

  • beerclue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    i use a minimal arch with the zen kernel and hyprland for home, work and play. no kde/gnome. for me it’s just right. except screen sharing in teams or discord, which haunts me… now it works, now it doesn’t.

  • Andromxda 🇺🇦🇵🇸🇹🇼@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Arch is pretty good, but it’s fairly easy to break it, if you don’t know what you’re doing. For gamers I recommend Bazzite. It’s an image-based fork of Fedora Atomic (Universal Blue). You can also try other ublue-based distros such as Aurora or Bluefin. Or Fedora Atomic flavors like Silverblue and Kinoite. In fact, you can easily switch between them without reinstalling your system. All it takes is one command, and ostree will do the magic.

    • Crazyslinkz@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah, there’s some issues with it, but I’m really tired of windows and don’t really want to install 11 or pay for it.

      Thanks for your response.

    • PushButton@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      As a Linux only user, I totally agree with your message.

      People who downvote you aren’t of good faith, are delusional or just dumb.

      Linux is better in every single category except ease of use for non-technical users and gaming.

      Let’s stop with this bandwagon of MS bad, Linux good; Linux is good enough for us to not lie and speak the truth…

      • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I’m not downvoting, but the fact that kernel malware games don’t work is a feature to me. It would be a full time job to keep from installing anything that demands obscene access for no legitimate reason on Windows. “It doesn’t work” is way easier.

        Pretty much everything else on Steam works without effort.